- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Updated Near Miss of the Day 671 – and “it’s not good news” from the police
A road.cc reader whose video we featured recently in our Near Miss of the Day series has been in touch to tell us of the outcome with police – and in his own words, “it’s not good news.”
Andy, who reported the very close pass on him by a lorry driver towing a trailer to Kent Police told us: “It would seem that I may need to move just over the border to neighbouring Surrey if I want to stay safe because Kent Police seem to view a dangerous close pass from a vehicle towing a trailer with incorrect number plates as not worthy of investigation due to their being no offence being committed.
“This is despite me providing the evidence from both a front and rear camera for at least three minutes before the incident to prove there were mitigating circumstances from a prior incident (something which I find hard to agree with and which suggests a prior incident could in some way negate a second regardless of the outcome).”
In their response, Andy was told: “After reviewing your call to us, there are no offences for Kent Police to record at this time; however if you access the Kent Police website, you can report such incidents there,” before informing him that if he wished “to report any further updates to this incident,” he could do so via email or on the non-emergency number 101.
Here’s our original article.
Today’s video in our Near Miss of the Day series shows a motorist in Kent being given a close pass last month by the driver of a flatbed lorry, who also happens to be towing a trailer with a mini digger on it.
Towing a trailer is something we often see contributing to close passes, with the driver typically pulling in before the rear of the trailer has passed the cyclist being overtaking.
In this case too, the situation is exacerbated by parked vehicles on the road and as the title of the video alludes to, is it really too much to expect the driver just to wait a couple of seconds until it is safe to overtake?
This one was submitted by road.cc reader Andy, who told us that he reported the incident to Kent Police six weeks ago.
“However, I've not had a response beyond confirmation of the report and it's their policy to not respond to reports after 6 weeks if they've been unable to take any action, so I guess that's the case with this one and it's OK to publish it now,” he said.
> Near Miss of the Day turns 100 - Why do we do the feature and what have we learnt from it?
Over the years road.cc has reported on literally hundreds of close passes and near misses involving badly driven vehicles from every corner of the country – so many, in fact, that we’ve decided to turn the phenomenon into a regular feature on the site. One day hopefully we will run out of close passes and near misses to report on, but until that happy day arrives, Near Miss of the Day will keep rolling on.
If you’ve caught on camera a close encounter of the uncomfortable kind with another road user that you’d like to share with the wider cycling community please send it to us at info [at] road.cc or send us a message via the road.cc Facebook page.
If the video is on YouTube, please send us a link, if not we can add any footage you supply to our YouTube channel as an unlisted video (so it won't show up on searches).
Please also let us know whether you contacted the police and if so what their reaction was, as well as the reaction of the vehicle operator if it was a bus, lorry or van with company markings etc.
> What to do if you capture a near miss or close pass (or worse) on camera while cycling
Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Latest Comments
- Miller 1 hour 34 min ago
Pogi and a few of the others are on the divisive new Colnago aero bike in those Insta photos.
- chrisonabike 2 hours 6 min ago
I prefer "dressing for the destination" - so if I want woke headgear I'll just put my thinking cap on, thanks.
- Mr Blackbird 2 hours 22 min ago
And good chat! I'm going on Zwift now. Have a good weekend.
- David9694 3 hours 11 min ago
Driver fuming after ploughing into carpark barrier 'painted black'...
- Keesvant 3 hours 16 min ago
Been using this light for 2 years now.....
- Pub bike 4 sec ago
A similar issue occurs every weekday on Priory Lane that links the Roehampton Gate entrance of Richmond Park with the Upper Richmond Road: part of...
- Dunnoeither 13 hours 43 min ago
Thankfully no one here lives in a country with a history of colonialism, slavery or a corrupt financial industry (the list goes on)so we can point...
- Mr Blackbird 16 hours 26 min ago
I agree. The officials probably earn a pittance or just get paid expenses. They do what they do for love of the sport. Without them the sport would...
- Hirsute 17 hours 43 min ago
Oxford from Emily Kerr "Anyone know anything about the THIRD major smash up on Iffley Rd in my ward in a year? "
Add new comment
52 comments
From the UK Gov website:
"Your trailer must display the same number plate as the vehicle you’re towing it with. If you’re towing more than one trailer, the number plate must be fixed to the trailer at the back."
Here's a portion from the statement/report to Kent Police:
"Note that the vehicle was towing a trailer which was displaying a different registration mark to the towing vehicle."
Despite this, allegedly "no offence" was committed?
There seems to be a little confusion over the comment I made regarding previous incidents (it's my video, BTW). typically when reporting an incident Kent Police ask that there is sufficient footage before and after any incident, presumably to show that there are no mitigating circumstances. In this instance there were none and indeed enough footage was submitted. My comment was simply questioning would it be OK to endanger somebody's life *if* there were?
They also ask that the footage isn't made public while investigating (presumably to avoid potential jurors seeing it and defence lawyers using this as some kind of defence against prosecution). Given that Kent Police say that if no response is received after 6 weeks then no further action is being taken explains why Hooper & Son's were unaware of the footage until posted. On this occasion I wrote to Kent Police for an update and were told that no offence had been committed (towing a trailer with a number plate different to the towing vehicle is not an offence?)
Interesting question re UK because where I live a trailer is registered separately and gets it's own different number plate. So, back to your question, would it be illegal if I towed my trailer to the UK. I think caravanners must know the answer to this.
Agricultural trailers generally do have their own registration plate, as it's otherwise a massive hassle to swap plates every time you stick them on the back of a different tractor. But everything else, AFAIK, must match the towing vehicle.
Genuine question, but why is that any different from LGVs?
In my company's vehicle yard tractor units carry a 3rd number plate that simply slots into the holder of whatever trailer they're towing - it's minimal hassle, no tools. Takes about the length of time to walk to eth end of the trailer when hooked up. When released same to retrieve.
Trailers can have their own number plate so that they can be used internationally, but in the UK, they still must display the same number as the towing vehicle. The exceptions either relate to military trailers which all have a number plate in the same format as military vehicles of which the DVLA holds records as being a military classification or where the towing vehicle is an agricultural machine, a plate fixed on the trailer may, instead of displaying the registration mark of the towing vehicle, display the mark of any other agricultural machine kept by the keeper of the towing vehicle.
Thanks for clearing up the confusion. Sorry for adding to it.
As for the number plate. Wrong plate = offence, Wrong colour plate = offence. But then for some reason the Police with their auto tracking cameras and own dash cams don't seem to want to do anything about all the other illegal number plates out there for some reason.
I've said it before and I'll say it again.
This is the type of NMOTD where road.cc really needs to contact the police for a comment in my opinion.
Finding hard to imagine what "mitigating circumstances from a prior incident" might be - surely the only thing that could be regarded as relevant by the police would be a previous altercation between the rider and the driver, in which case the only influence it could have would be to raise the bar from bad driving to deliberate aggression. Anything else is surely irrelevant to this particular incident?
It's a rather worrying statement (to put in mildly). Are the police in effect saying, "you might have upset the driver before, in which case it is fine for him to endanger your life with his vehicle"?
Well, the obvious response to "making a rude gesture" or using a naughty word is "run them over until they are dead flat"
Or, indeed, that if retribution is OK, you can lie in wait and sort them out at your convenience and in the manner you choose. Which is of course, also unacceptable and Not Cricket (if deliciously tempting).
For completeness I'd like to see the earlier incident, just to see why the Rozzers dont think this one is worth of follow up.
The rider clearly had to take evasive action which makes the lack of follow up even less acceptable.
So there was a prior incident (details of which would have been nice). But Kent Police decided that forcing someone to brake heavily to avoid being side swiped is not worthy of action on its own, then used said prior incident as justification for the drivers actions rather then evidence of premeditation.
If you can, you need to take this up the chain of complaints and maybe even publicise it using local newspapers etc.send the video via twitter to their branded Twitter accounts etc, especially the road police one.
Are the police effectively saying this was retribution, so that's OK? Is that how it is supposed to work, tit for tat until might prevails or the vulnerable get hurt?
I didn't read it like that - I read it hat the 3 minutes video proved there was no mitigating circumstances from a possible prior incident
It does read oddly - I'm wondering if a word's gone missing, and it should read "despite me providing the evidence from both a front and rear camera for at least three minutes before the incident to prove there were no mitigating circumstances"?
Ahh, yes, that would be it - I think I'd subconsciously placed the "no" into teh sentence
thats how I read it, I think the word "no" has been lost before mitigating cirumstances, either from original quote from "Andy" or in copying by Simon MacMichael.
Leave him! He's already dead!
The article needs an edit to make things clearer. There's a bit of a mish-mash of the rider's comments and the journo's (and some NMotD cut-and-paste).
“After reviewing your call to us, there are no offences for Kent Police to record at this time;"
Then when? If Kent police can't see the clear, definitive, blatant law-breaking there, then they are in the wrong job. No doubt they'll be full of sorrow when the next cyclist is killed on their patch. Perhaps they should uphold the law instead of ignoring it, then they won't need to feel sorry so often.
What I couldn't see was what triggered the driver to move back in so early?
I do see some drivers who are horrified by the thought of having a wheel over the line and are desperate to get back to safety even though there is half a mile of visibility. In this case, as no oncoming traffic could get through, why was he so intent on moving across?
the blue oncoming car stopped right at the end of the clip?
I think the blue oncoming car was the reason not to attempt to overtake the cyclist in the first place.
As for IanMSpencer's comment, you're right, the van was cutting up the cyclist something shocking before we even knew there was a trailer attached, so absolutely no excuses (not even the spurious 'forgot about the trailer'). Still, someone 'had to be inconvenienced' I suppose.
What blue car ?
'The miserable grey overcast sky was in my eyes, your honour.'
Can't you see it? - the blue and gold one...
Hooper & Son have commented on YouTube saying it is the first they've heard of it.
However, their reply is a bit "oh noes, might get negative reviews about our workmanship and driving is nothing to do with that."
I find it hard to accept no action from the police in this case. It was an extremely close pass that forced the rider to brake and move into the kerb to avoid a collision. This is the type of NMOTD where road.cc really needs to contact the police for a comment in my opinion.
Pages