Residents living near a school have claimed they are 'prisoners in their own home' after a new traffic safety scheme was put in place.
Households in Durham Close, Cheltenham, said that since the School Streets scheme, that is currently being trialled at Warden Hill Primary School, has been introduced they feel like they are unable to leave their homes when they like, despite being provided with permits by the council to come and go as they please.
They also claim that parents and children are 'being unnecessarily encouraged to spread out across the road to walk to the school in the cul-de-sac'.
Gloucestershire County Council is currently trialling an 18-month initiative with three schools in the county which aims to improve road safety and air quality, reduce traffic congestion, encourage active travel and healthy lifestyles.
One resident, Deborah Hughes, 56, spoke to Gloucestershire Live and expressed her anger at the scheme.
She said: "I've been here 24, 25 years, but some residents have been here 54 years and they're being told how they can live.
"In the name of the School Streets Scheme we're being told that for two hours every day we are not allowed to receive visitors, family, friends, tradesman or deliveries.
"This is after a year of restrictions because of Covid, and now further restrictions are being forced upon us, why are we being bullied?"
"They [Gloucestershire County Council / Gloucestershire Highways] arrived and put up signs and started painting lines and residents weren't told at all, there was no consultation.
"We always try and avoid kick out time, but deliveries are being blocked and businesses are being run here, you can't make people hold their life for two hours a day every day - it's like we're prisoners in our own homes."
Another family said that the scheme was restricting the care required for the household, they said: "In the 42 years we have lived here, there have been many occasions when we have had to call on district nurses to help with my husband's care.
"With the changes in the way nurses are now organised it would be a different nurse nearly every time.
"They would be unable to guarantee that they could come outside the restricted hours and would begrudge the time wasted in explaining who and why they are visiting, let alone the breach of privacy this raises."
Another said: "I have no way to arrange a date or time for the delivery of my medication, they are sent out using 48hour delivery, and usually arrive in the morning often between 8am and 9 am, what am I supposed to do if some jobsworth turns my medical delivery away if it arrives during the restricted hours?"
Gloucestershire County Council has said it is trialling an 18-month initiative with three schools in the county, starting from November 2, 2020.
The Gloucestershire County Council website states that they will "work with schools to collect data on how pupils and staff travel to school", it also says that they will monitor traffic and air quality.
Mrs Hughes added: "We want a one way system on the path, but the school is making them mill all over the school and there are children are all over the road with their scooters.
"The children don't remember what time that is so it's happening all the time.
"My husband is a shift worker and he says it's an accident waiting to happen. They can come and go when they want but we can't.
"It's not the School Streets Scheme we have a problem with.
"It's how it's being implemented. School streets is never intended to affect the residents this way or block them from moving freely.
"Traffic needs to flow to and from the residents should be unaffected. They've put signs up that effectively stop people coming up the road."
A spokesman for Gloucestershire County Council said: “Durham Close, by Warden Hill Primary School, is closed to most traffic during school drop-off and pick-up times and is open to people on foot, bike or scooter.
"The school street scheme trial aims to improve road safety and air quality, reduce traffic congestion, encourage active travel and healthy lifestyles; as well as creating more space outside the school so people can keep to social distancing guidelines to help prevent the spread of Covid-19.
"All residents have been issued with permits allowing them and visitors including delivery vehicles, tradespeople and carers access to Durham Close during the road closure times. As this is a trial scheme we are always interested in feedback from residents, the school and pupils."
Warden Hill Primary School declined to comment.
Add new comment
43 comments
But if the road was not monitored and school drop offs were allowed right up to the gate, the same drivers still wouldn't be able to deliver, the same nurses still wouldn't be able to get to the houses for these rigid appointments and all the others
moansconcerns would be there but it would be because of the traffic grid locking the road and trying to turn around in small spaces.I used to live very close to a large junior and infant school on a well used road. Parents used to park down both sides so a wide road was turned into single track for about 200 yards either side of the main entrance. They used to park on the "school, no parking" zigzags until the council started to send parking wardens down it at those times. And the parking on all the junction areas made crossing or driving out of side roads dangerous for both cars and pedestrians as well until double yellows were added in those areas.
In my experience that will just be a change from 'couldn't deliver; not home' to 'couldn't deliver; no access'. No less deliveries will actually happen.
I expect that there are 2 reasons for the permits:
1. Trying to get more people to walk/cycle to school
2. Issues from parents dumping cars everywhere when dropping kids off...
I bet the residents complain bitterly about 'i'll just be 5 minutes' SUV's on/across their driveway (Only illegal if you provably block someone from accessing the road.) It is almost impossible to prevent because it requires overstretched police to witness and no court is going to 'waste' its time for a one off for a few £100 fine (if that), instead suggesting the officer should just tell them to move (making way for the next 'JB5M SUV...) Make the road permit holder only during drop off/pickup time and a single officer can issue a dozen fixed penalties to parents... (in fact it may even be possible to outsource to parking wardens or school staff... One officer + 2-3 school staff can issue a lot of penalties very quickly...). All of a sudden you can pick a random day or two each month and hit half the parents abusing parking in one go...
There are a couple I'm aware of through friends kids up here in Scotland. They've closed off streets "in front" of the school....so what's happened, the streets "behind" the school have become mobbed every day. The school having a front and rear gate.
I get what they are trying to do, but IMO are onto a losing cause, removing vehicles from one road for a couple of hours a day doesn't remove that much Co2. I don't know how it works in England, but when I went to primary school in Scotland, with the exception of a few who lived outside of my town, you were zoned into your local school and it was always within walking distance. Things changed in secondary because they had larger catchment areas, so you had school transport, cycling and walking. I don't remember many getting a lift in a personal car though.
I often think it's the parents either being lazy. I like seeing these cycling/walking "buses" that some schools have employed, so a few leaders will start at the furthest away child and pick up children all the way to school, those who don't live on the route join at certain points. Therefore keeping everyone together, relatively safe and not having lots of vehicles sitting at the school gates.
...and thereby encouraging the children to get into the habit of travelling by foot / bike / etc. - which could mean a lifetime of reduced car use.
They aren't asking for one way vehicle traffic (can't one way, it is a dead end cul-de-sac)...
They want one way foot traffic on the pavement! (basically complaining about it being hard to drive because too many children on the road, next to a school that has been there for decades... (probably built at the same time as the houses...)
At what point does someone need a permit? No good if you have to turn up with one.
The request for one way seems reasonable.
How do you one way a closed avenue with no other exit?
I think what she is stating is each path should be one way as the other moan seems to be that the primary school children and parents are then walking up the road and not the pavement due to less road traffic and everyone walking. This then means her husband will knock children down at some point or something like that.
I didn't suggest it wasn't a path.
One way pavements in towns have been used over the last year.
Pathetic.
They are trying to keep children safe, and provide safe ways for them not to be driven to school.
I'm guessing if a free for all would be allowed the residents would find anything difficult because of all of the cars driving in and out dropping off and picking up the little ones.
I agree. I find the way the residents exaggerate an occasional minor inconvenience pathetic,
Pages