A driver caught on camera by Mike van Erp – better known on social media as CyclingMikey – texting and swiping through Tinder photos has escaped a driving ban after convincing magistrates that he would suffer ‘exceptional hardship’ if his driving licence were taken away. What’s more, while the driver was awaiting prosecution for that offence, van Erp caught him using his phone at the wheel again.
Van Erp, who appeared on the road.cc Podcast in January, filmed property developer Riaz Rattansi, aged 50, using his phone at the wheel of his Audi in a slow-moving queue of traffic in Hyde Park as he swiped through profiles on the dating app in June last year, as well as sending a text message.
> “Tired of road crime”: CyclingMikey on episode 16 of the road.cc Podcast
The cyclist told the motorist: “You’ve just been caught out very badly – using your phone, looking through Tinder, swiping left on all the women,” and got an apology from the driver.
From the footage, he seemed aware that he had been caught breaking the law – although when charged with using a mobile phone while driving, he initially denied having committed the offence.
Appearing at Lavender Hill Magistrates’ Court in south west London last week, Rattansi was fined £284 and had his driving licence endorsed with six penalty points after pleading guilty.
Since he already had six points on his licence due to two previous convictions for speeding, Rattansi magistrates considered banning him from driving, but accepted his argument that he would suffer exceptional hardship if he lost his licence.
Speaking after the hearing in the above video, van Erp referenced Rattansi’s exceptional hardship defence and said “Rightly or wrongly … that’s not for me to decide.
“Clearly, when you’ve committed driving offences, you should experience some hardship, and the plan is that other people, innocent parties around you, don’t take the hardship from your offences.”
He continued: “I’m not going to give any details of his exceptional hardship, you know, that’s his personal details, but I will say I really felt quite sympathetic towards the driver.
“It turns out we’re a similar age, some of our life circumstances are similar – so I have quite a bit of sympathy for him, even though I don’t agree with his phone-driving behaviour.”
Van Erp added: “Why did I go stand in the gallery to observe the trial? Well, mostly out of respect to him … filming people committing offences has very real effects on their lives, and if I can’t face up to those effects and stand eye to eye and still think it’s the right thing, then I shouldn’t be doing this. It is painful, but I’m still convinced I’m doing the right thing.”
Towards the end of van Erp’s video, footage shot last November, while Rattansi was awaiting trial as a result of the earlier video, shows him using his mobile phone at the wheel again, this time on Bayswater Road close to Kensington Gardens.
In the description to the video, van Erp says: “I caught this guy twice. I'm not sure whether swiping through Tinder would count as interactive communication under the old mobile phone laws, but that sent message on iMessages was an absolute slam-dunk of an evidence catch.
“The second time I caught him he was holding the phone, and under today's laws that would likely be enough evidence for a prosecution, but it wasn't sufficient evidence in November 2021.”
In December, Cycling UK highlighted how one in five drivers who faced a ban under the so-called ‘totting-up’ procedure were allowed to keep their driving licence after pleading exceptional hardship and how in some cases, the motorist had gone on to be convicted of killing another road user, including cyclist Lee Martin and motorcyclist Louis McGovern, and urged that the loophole be closed through the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill currently before Parliament.
> Parliament urged to close ‘exceptional hardship’ loophole that lets motorists who go on to kill keep licences
Duncan Dollimore, Cycling UK’s head of campaigns, said at the time: “We’ve got courts treating inconvenience as exceptional hardship and a legal loophole that costs lives is making a mockery of the supposedly automatic totting up ban.
“We’ve no assessment of risks when magistrates make these decisions to allow someone to carry on driving, but they are accepting bland assertions that losing a licence will cause them difficulties.
“It’s families such as Louis McGovern’s and Lee Martin’s who really suffer exceptional hardship when the courts put the retention of someone’s licence to drive above road safety, allowing irresponsible people to carry on driving until they cause further harm or death on the roads,” he added.
Cycling UK has put in place an online action enabling people to write to their MPs to “encourage them to take action to help fix our failing traffic laws.”
Add new comment
35 comments
If it would cause someone exceptional hardship to lose the privilege of driving, you'd think they would take more care to ensure it didn't happen. Every time I hear someone like this use "exceptional hardship" as a defence, all I see is a person who thinks they're exceptional and above suffering hardship.
I'm a little on the fence on this one. He committed 2 offenses in quick sucession whilst the first was still being dealt with, and Mikey indicated a lot of sympathy for his circumstances.
I'm all for evidenced exceptional hardship as a 1 last strike. It being limited to care giving type excuses - pallative care or long term disabilities only.
The next offense. Instaban. Especially for someone who travels around London.
I'm a little on the fence on this one
I'm not. He deserved a ban- dating app use while driving is a heinous offence
You're just bitter coz ppl keep left swiping you. 😉
I go on holiday for a week and this site goes all "Tinder" and "Extreme Hardship" - cyclingmikey is now pornmikey I assume?
No, he's batman
CyclingMikey "Who made him Batman?"
If the points system for dangerous drivers isn't working, and it clearly isn't, then it needs to be changed. Instead of losing your licence at 12 points, how about having your car impounded for a week? Break the law again within a year, and it gets impounded for a month, do it again within a year from that and it's six months.
And no tear-stained pleas for hardship. You do the crime, you do the time.
That is a sensible idea. I'd like a consultation on throwing 12 pointers to the lions.
1 week for each point on your licence, plus you pay the impound fee for that time too.
The comments on FB about this story are pretty bad. Lots of non cyclists saying it wasn't a dangerous close pass, even one guy who claims to be a cyclist.
You have to draw a line in the sand...
What as shame the driver's number plate (or license plate just to annoy a certain someone 😉) wasn't KN18AOB and not KN18AOD. I think you get my meaning 😀
At least the driver wasn't have a "W" with the other hand whilst looking at the pictures. Proving that not all Audi drivers are ...kers.
I thought that the idea is that by adding points to a license, that the driver then needs to be driving carefully so that they don't suffer hardship, but the hardship defense is making a mockery of it.
"This is your final warning", followed by "this is really your final warning" followed by "have another final warning".
From 2017 - there are over 10,000 people with 12 or more points on their driving license who have escaped a ban. Including someone with 51(!) points.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-40862975
Tory government innit - hardship everywhere
"Okay, just one more final warning..."
Followed by, "Look - we're being serious here... We really mean it this time."
(I have children - that line just doesn't ever work...).
They really should make parents and teachers devise legislation - 'one final chance' really does never work.
As long as they don't go down the route of "I don't know which one of you did it, so I'm punishing all of you". (c.f. Bedford town centre)
LICENCE.
The driver should have seen Mikey in his WING MIRROR
Well that is entirely consistent. Once it has been established to the satisfaction of a judge that losing your licence would cause exceptional hardship, I would expect that sets a precedent. Logically, it will still cause the same hardship the next time, and the time after that. So the points become meaningless, you are bullet proof.
The fine should be much higher, means tested, so for this guy 8-10k GBP as a fine would be more of a burn for him. Thats a whole year of high class restaurants and escorts for a guy like this.
You might not have accounted for inflation since 1960.
But there's another possibility - that his definition of "high class" hasn't changed since then.
The hardship excuse only works once; can't be used for further offences.
The hardship excuse only works once; can't be used for further offences
At least one of us doesn't believe this
Not in this country - we are not australia
*citation required*
That would be a good idea, but unfortunately is not what we're stuck with in the UK.
Pages