Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Video: “Nutjob” cyclist attacks another rider for overtaking him on London’s CS3 (warning: contains extreme language)

Perpetrator receives suspended sentence following shocking incident on flagship cycle route in July 2020

A cyclist described as a “nutjob” has received a suspended prison sentence after threatening another rider and attacking him with D-locks as well as stamping on his bike on London’s CS3, the capital’s flagship cycle route that runs along the north side of the Thames.

Michael Reyes, the victim, took footage of the shocking incident on a helmet-mounted camera, and has posted a video to YouTube now the court case has been concluded, with the footage flagged to road.cc by Mike van Erp, whose videos posted under the name Cycling Mikey have secured the conviction of hundreds of motorists for a range of driving offences.

In the description to the video, Mr Reyes says that the unnamed perpetrator was convicted at City of London Magistrates’ Court with using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour causing fear of or provoking violence, an offence under section 4 of the Public Order Act 1986, and with criminal damage to property valued under £5,000, contrary to the Criminal Damage Act 1971.

The incident on 17 July 2020 started shortly before the Blackfriars underpass on CS3 as both cyclists headed westward, with the perpetrator apparently dropping back before catching up with the victim again at a red light just before the ramp up to the junction at the northern end of Blackfriars Bridge.

Mr Reyes said: “Last July I had started playing around with different places to mount a camera to record my bike rides. On one fateful day I chose to test it mounted to my helmet. Little did I know how much that would save me just a few hours later.

“On this day the weather was fantastic so I left work about an hour early so I could get a nice long ride in before I commuted home. Unfortunately I only made it about a half mile from my office when I was verbally abused and attacked by another cyclist.

“At first I thought the rant was amusing because I had the camera on my head pointing right at him so I assumed he was just trying to be entertaining but when he pointed out my accent and how it's a problem I realised it maybe wasn't very funny so I tried to just get away.

“He catches back up with me at the next red light and attempts to attack me with two different D-locks. I manage to defend myself and he runs off. I step away from the scene to apologise to those around me when he comes back to my bike and stomps on it, bending the fork, frame, wheel, and disc brake. Luckily as he flees he is stopped by a member of the City of London Police.”

In his text commentary to the video, Mr Reyes said that the police officer “took our statements, witness statements, and called for additional officers.

“No arrests were made on the day,” he continued. “I specifically said I didn’t think it was necessary.

“Only after reviewing the footage when I got home did I realise he could have really hurt me.

“By October 2020 the investigating officer asked him to come in for an interview. He didn’t.

“A warrant was put out for his arrest and by mid-January 2021 he was finally arrested.”

He was charged with the offences in February, and pleaded not guilty to them at an initial hearing in late March, which the trial taking place in August.

Mr Reyes said that once the case went to trial, the defence “rested completely on the belief that his locks supposedly fell out of his pockets as he pulled alongside me and I allegedly grabbed them to hit him. The damage to my bike was supposedly caused by it falling to the ground.

“I know defence lawyers need to represent their client as best as possible but their claims were asinine when viewing the video evidence put forward,” he said.

The offences of which the defendant was convicted carry maximum penalties, on summary conviction (ie at magistrates’ court), of six months’ imprisonment or a fine in the case of threatening behaviour and three months’ imprisonment for property damage.

Mr Reyes added: “Luckily the City of London Magistrates’ Court agreed with me and he was found guilty and eventually sentenced to 26 weeks’ imprisonment, suspended for 24 months, 20 days Rehabilitation Activity Requirement, and ordered to compensate me for my bike.”

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

81 comments

Avatar
eburtthebike | 3 years ago
3 likes

Astonishing!  I can only assume that this guy was off his meds and not in control of his actions, but no such claim appears to have been made in court, in which case the headline of "nut job" is entirely justified.

Just like all the road rage drivers, this road rage cyclist should be banned, or at least have his bike crushed in front of him.

Avatar
IanMK replied to eburtthebike | 3 years ago
0 likes

I think the clue is in the sentence including a RAR. He must have issues that would benefit from rehabilitation.

Avatar
Blackthorne | 3 years ago
2 likes

On a side note the nut job does seem passionate about his bicycle. Look at all the dedicated investment in bar mounted illumination and the post apocalyptic urban warrior costume. One can't help but wonder how all those lights were acquired....

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to Blackthorne | 3 years ago
3 likes

Blackthorne wrote:

On a side note the nut job does seem passionate about his bicycle. Look at all the dedicated investment in bar mounted illumination and the post apocalyptic urban warrior costume. One can't help but wonder how all those lights were acquired....

And 2 D-locks! A thug's Viennetta. One is never enough.....

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Captain Badger | 3 years ago
4 likes

Captain Badger wrote:

And 2 D-locks! A thug's Viennetta. One is never enough.....

Aldi sells some tiny Viennetta-on-a-stick - the mint flavour is especially great and because they're small you can have two if you like.

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to hawkinspeter | 3 years ago
5 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

......

Aldi sells some tiny Viennetta-on-a-stick - the mint flavour is especially great and because they're small you can have two if you like.

Avatar
Donaldp | 3 years ago
3 likes

What's all the stuff on his shoulders?

It looks like the sort of 'tacticool' nonsense you see the gravy seals wear.

Avatar
lukei1 replied to Donaldp | 3 years ago
1 like

Donaldp wrote:

gravy seals

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to lukei1 | 3 years ago
6 likes

lukei1 wrote:

Donaldp wrote:

gravy seals

Semper Pie dudes....

Avatar
Secret_squirrel | 3 years ago
15 likes

Hopefully the perp has learnt his lesson and next time will use a car to attack the cyclist and get off with caution.

 

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to Secret_squirrel | 3 years ago
9 likes

Secret_squirrel wrote:

Hopefully the perp has learnt his lesson and next time will use a car to attack the cyclist and get off with caution.

Oh come now, you're just being silly...how would it ever get to a caution? Police would probably label it NFA and send Mr Reyes a warning about his provocative behaviour.

Avatar
Ride On replied to Rendel Harris | 3 years ago
2 likes

The difference between this outcome and the wiltshire assault will e largely down to 2 things 1. His unwillingness to admit the offence, and 2. His previous good/bad character.

Avatar
andystow replied to Ride On | 3 years ago
7 likes

Ride On wrote:

The difference between this outcome and the wiltshire assault will e largely down to 2 things 1. His unwillingness to admit the offence, and 2. His previous good/bad character.

Also, "Luckily as he flees he is stopped by a member of the City of London Police.” I assume the police officer witnessed it. Much more believable than a mere camera.

Avatar
mpr1991 replied to andystow | 3 years ago
7 likes

Hi, Mr. Reyes here. The officer was behind a wall on the other side of Puddle Dock Rd. In his statement he said he didn't have direct line of sight to the incident but said he heard a commotion so he emerged to see the defendant running away when he ordered him to stop so he could see what was going on. 

When the additional officers arrived they initially said "sorry bud, but unless we can get some CCTV it's really just your word against his" which is when I showed them that I had a camera on my helmet. Their eyes lit up and they then seemed more willing to help. Probably because they knew that if the video recording aligned with mine and the independent witness statements then it would be a pretty open and shut case, which it was.

So you're right, probably not just because of the camera. But nothing would have happened in the end without it.

Avatar
wtjs replied to mpr1991 | 3 years ago
3 likes

officers arrived they initially said "sorry bud...

Hope they didn't! We're still smarting over 1776. Thanks for giving us the information and follow-up 'from the horse's mouth'- that sounds American.

Avatar
mpr1991 replied to wtjs | 3 years ago
3 likes

Haha oops. You can take the man out of America but never the American out of the man. Ironically I don't think I ever say bud in normal conversation.

Avatar
andystow replied to mpr1991 | 3 years ago
0 likes

mpr1991 wrote:

Haha oops. You can take the man out of America but never the American out of the man. Ironically I don't think I ever say bud in normal conversation.

Gotcha.

Avatar
EddyBerckx | 3 years ago
2 likes

Total nut job!!! You do get them from time to time. Well done to the police and justice system for once...though I wonder what would have happened if it was a car driver giving the abuse and doing the attack (not really, I know)

The victim handled it pretty well tbh, not sure what else he could have done

 

Avatar
dodgy | 3 years ago
10 likes

"and ordered to compensate me for my bike." Which inevitably, you won't ever get. Not from this type of character.

 

Avatar
vthejk replied to dodgy | 3 years ago
0 likes

For reference, an ex-partner has still not been compensated for an iPhone (stolen from behind a shop till, then binned before the bobbies caught him). The phone was stolen and the rotter ordered to pay compensation in 2016...

Avatar
andystow replied to dodgy | 3 years ago
0 likes

I believe you can get a court to do it. They can literally have property seized and sold to pay the claim.

https://www.gov.uk/make-court-claim-for-money/enforce-a-judgment

Fees to the court are on the order of 10-15% of the judgment. I suspect he would have to give anything collected to his insurer, however, as they've already paid his claim.

Pages

Latest Comments