At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
…
Tom Dumoulin's half marathan time may be quick, but surely Chris Froome would be quicker??
Boss to designer, "Take a toot on the crack pipe and give it some more ugly injections"....
Yeah, we could do with some comprehensive compatibility tables. I've got 8-, 9-, 10- and 11-speed Shimano set-ups in the fleet. Only just ditched 7...
Yes - I wasn't suggesting that your > 1 in 5 was wrong, just that it undersells how many of those subscribers they need to convert.
Such an interesting situation. Great that the Lime project is encouraging people to use bicycles for their transport and that the company...
I suspect it's probably less about Respect, and more about Reform...
Even if they're festooned with hi vis markings?
Hmm, it's overly bright car headlights that bother me most TBH.
I totally agree, cycle lanes are useless and no cyclist is using them