At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Add new comment
2 comments
What's on the bottom of the Hump?
The sides, top and back look well endowed with 3M. But, is the bottom..?
Ever noticed that when a rider is tucked or using drops (to following road users) the most visible bit of their rucksack is the bit that never has any reflectiveness? Every back-pack I've had has a hard wearing - anti skuff - bottom, but no 3M or dayglow...
yeah, i definitely hear what you're saying. because the hump is a cover and isn't designed to deal with the everyday scuffing and suchforth, the scotchlite does extend a lot farther down than it does normally. not right to the bottom, mind, but further. i think its core market is more sat up types doing their commute on their hybrids, but it will make you more visible on the drops too. maybe they should do a more roadie-specific one with all the scotchlite on the base...