At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
their classic designs are arguably their USP, which is fair enough, but you need to offer more than just a basic design with a rapha logo on the...
Road safety is everyone's business...
Why would any ethical person want to support the CCP dictatorship that doesn't respect fair trade, the international rule of law, intellectual...
The trouble is the majority of the nation reads the Sun, the Daily Mail and then the Times and the Telegraph, the Express, the FT and then the...
Interestingly, I joined Cycling UK some time ago and have been enjoying their bi monthly magazine....
Roche's 1987 was even more special because of what went before it.
Speedometers in cars do not stop car drivers from driving over the speed limit.
If my boys found out I had a computer with a wind sensor they would find a non bike related use for it!
I'm not brave enough to go through at more than jogging pace......
There's issues around PSA tests and it's likely not beneficial population-wise to have screening....