At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
I think there is more chance of an Internet Portal and Plocez Scotland doing something to help cyclists, before presumed liability comes in.
While the overall point may be fair, applying the '50% of adults have a license' is almost certainly rather misleading - it's highly unlikely that...
Actually you basically prove that the new bike is a lot faster. You more or less have the same times with both bikes but you riding like a weather...
Even in our 'cycling perfect' country (The Netherlands) overtakes like those are totally common. I wouldn't bat an eye, honestly....
No they haven't, otherwise there wouldn't still be a debate over it.
I'm sorry I close passed you but my vehicle is too wide
Sorry, fixed the double entry! ...
BMW Mini, not a proper one.
See recently reported comments by elected labour party represenetives in Burnley to see how that works.
I often come into Bristol along the dual carriageway there as it's quicker than trying to find my way on the bike paths, but then I'm used to...