Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Ekoi promising "no more tan marks" with new Solair jersey

The Solair jersey blocks out harmful rays and lets the good ones in, so Ekoi say, in order to leave you free of unsightly tan lines...

There are a number of pet peeves that bug the road.cc team when out for a long ride in the summer sun: GPS dying, punctures, having to stop to buy more cake... and then of course there's our number one dilemma that eats away at our very souls... of course, we're talking about tan lines. 

Five cool products coming soon to road.cc
Review: Chapeau! Etape jersey

Luckily for us, and you, Ekoi have come up with a mighty fine solution to this problem with their new Solair jersey, that has a 'trans-bronzing' effect in order to block out the sun's harmful UV-B rays, but let in the UV-A rays that allow the skin to tan. Ekoi say it works like a medium-level sunscreen, protecting the skin to some degree with their patented fabric technology dubbed SunSelect Textiles. 

It's of little use to those of us who simply burn at the slightest hint of sunshine (Ekoi say that "people prone to sunburn need to apply an additional sun screen before putting on the shirt in order to be completely protected") but for those who have trouble convincing non-cycling folk that epic tan lines are a badge of honour, the Solair could be just the ticket. 
 

ekoi solair 2.png

Ekoi show us the perils of not wearing their Solair jersey

 

The Solair has a full zip on the front and three back pockets, and is available in red, blue or green colours. It's only available through Ekoi's website direct, with the price set at €99/roughly £83. There's also a €50 discount if you buy two. 

We can't wait to test the Solair out on the bike, and perhaps the sunbed, so check out our reviews section in the coming months for a road.cc verdict...

 

 

Jack has been writing about cycling and multisport for over a decade, arriving at road.cc via 220 Triathlon Magazine in 2017. He worked across all areas of the website including tech, news and video, and also contributed to eBikeTips before being named Editor of road.cc in 2021 (much to his surprise). Jack has been hooked on cycling since his student days, and currently has a Trek 1.2 for winter riding, a beloved Bickerton folding bike for getting around town and an extra beloved custom Ridley Helium SLX for fantasising about going fast in his stable. Jack has never won a bike race, but does have a master's degree in print journalism and two Guinness World Records for pogo sticking (it's a long story). 

Add new comment

22 comments

Avatar
Mungecrundle | 7 years ago
1 like

http://www.skincancer.org/prevention/uva-and-uvb

http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/st...

 

Please make yourself aware of the risks of skin cancer.

 

I look forward to the 1 star rating of this product in due course.

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... | 7 years ago
0 likes

It's a bit exasperating that there's such a narrow line between 'skin damage' and 'vitamin D deficiency'. Almost as if evolution has screwed up there.

Why haven't we evolved to cope, in both respects, with the level of sunlight we actually get (assuming one lives at the same latitude as one's ancestors) without all this nonsense about smearing greasy goop all over yourself?

Actually I once spent most of a summer cycling outside all day and every day, and at the end of it not only did I have 'tan lines' but my Vitamin D level was still way below 'insufficient'

PS - seems like a stupid product.

Avatar
jjjono81 | 7 years ago
0 likes

From the same company that produces the "one size fits all" bibshorts.
Not convinced by either, no doubt both will be available heavily reduced on Sportpursuit some time soon...

Avatar
Al__S | 7 years ago
0 likes

Dangerous nonsense- I hope road.cc won't be reviewing this, I think it would be frankly negligent to do so (exposing the tester to harm)

Avatar
Chris Hayes | 7 years ago
0 likes

Nonsense idea.  how are we to distinguish fellow cyclists from the sunbed brigade?  Deep and well-defined tan lines are like rings in oaks trees....they denote kms travelled.

Avatar
captain_slog | 7 years ago
7 likes

So they manufactured a load of these before realising they'd forgotten to spec the UV protection. All seemed lost until the marketing department came up with a cunning plan, my lord.

Avatar
brooksby | 7 years ago
2 likes

(1) *Any* suntan is skin damage; and (2) how many people will actually see any tan lines you might have developed as a consequence of shorts and short-sleeved jersey?

Avatar
Toast replied to brooksby | 7 years ago
1 like
brooksby wrote:

(2) how many people will actually see any tan lines you might have developed as a consequence of shorts and short-sleeved jersey?

The important ones, however many of those you may cultivate :p

The chap in the Photoshop "example" doesn't appear to have strap lines... hmm. I guess if they do a skinsuit (tenuous pun?) you'll only have the chamois to think about :p

Avatar
srchar | 7 years ago
0 likes

Rule 7, surely?

Avatar
Mungecrundle | 7 years ago
4 likes

The very fact of tanning is the body's reaction to damage caused by UV rays.

Without doing some google searching of reputable dermatology and oncology resources, this smells like psuedo science crap of the first order which may lead to actual harm.

Avatar
Leviathan | 7 years ago
2 likes

So they are also selling tan thru bibshorts?

Avatar
ConcordeCX replied to Leviathan | 7 years ago
1 like

Leviathan wrote:

So they are also selling tan thru bibshorts?

ride commando, big boy

Avatar
Leviathan replied to ConcordeCX | 7 years ago
1 like

ConcordeCX wrote:

Leviathan wrote:

So they are also selling tan thru bibshorts?

ride commando, big boy

Always. I don't think you know what Going Commando means.

Avatar
ConcordeCX replied to Leviathan | 7 years ago
1 like

Leviathan wrote:

ConcordeCX wrote:

Leviathan wrote:

So they are also selling tan thru bibshorts?

ride commando, big boy

Always. I don't think you know what Going Commando means.

i do, but I got it wrong!

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/011/786/homer-simpson-d...

 

Avatar
BehindTheBikesheds | 7 years ago
3 likes

They haven't thought this through because unless you're putting protection on all over your body, front, back or do they think that skin changes colour when exposed to sun for a different reason to what science does?

So if you're solo that's next to impossible and getting a pal to rub sun cream in all over your back for you is very likely to be met with a "get stuffed", even if they are starting out with you as you really want it applied 15-20 minutes before you go out and re-apply it after a couple of hours because the sweat will effect the protection so getting said riding partner to re-apply all over your sweaty body so that you don't get tan lines is again going to be met with more negatives/looks of 'what the fuck'. That's on top of the obvious stupidness of the idea.

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to BehindTheBikesheds | 7 years ago
0 likes
BehindTheBikesheds wrote:

They haven't thought this through because unless you're putting protection on all over your body, front, back or do they think that skin changes colour when exposed to sun for a different reason to what science does?

So if you're solo that's next to impossible and getting a pal to rub sun cream in all over your back for you is very likely to be met with a "get stuffed", even if they are starting out with you as you really want it applied 15-20 minutes before you go out and re-apply it after a couple of hours because the sweat will effect the protection so getting said riding partner to re-apply all over your sweaty body so that you don't get tan lines is again going to be met with more negatives/looks of 'what the fuck'. That's on top of the obvious stupidness of the idea.

What? I don't think I've ever seen anyone stop to re apply sun cream midride in the UK. So as the jerseu will clearly not let all UVA rays through i dont see why it woukd be needed under the jersey.

Avatar
BehindTheBikesheds replied to wycombewheeler | 7 years ago
1 like

wycombewheeler wrote:
BehindTheBikesheds wrote:

They haven't thought this through because unless you're putting protection on all over your body, front, back or do they think that skin changes colour when exposed to sun for a different reason to what science does?

So if you're solo that's next to impossible and getting a pal to rub sun cream in all over your back for you is very likely to be met with a "get stuffed", even if they are starting out with you as you really want it applied 15-20 minutes before you go out and re-apply it after a couple of hours because the sweat will effect the protection so getting said riding partner to re-apply all over your sweaty body so that you don't get tan lines is again going to be met with more negatives/looks of 'what the fuck'. That's on top of the obvious stupidness of the idea.

What? I don't think I've ever seen anyone stop to re apply sun cream midride in the UK. So as the jerseu will clearly not let all UVA rays through i dont see why it woukd be needed under the jersey.

So you think a jersey that lets the skin go brown underneath it as per the pic above then you shouldn't need to add suncream underneath? what do you think is happening as to why the skin goes darker when exposed to sunlight, why do you think that the darkened skin shown in the pic underneath the jersey needs less protection than the skin exposed?

My point about re-application is that doing so when cycling so that even when wearing the jersey would be nonsense, jesus, please bother to understand plain English!

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to BehindTheBikesheds | 7 years ago
0 likes
BehindTheBikesheds wrote:

wycombewheeler wrote:
BehindTheBikesheds wrote:

They haven't thought this through because unless you're putting protection on all over your body, front, back or do they think that skin changes colour when exposed to sun for a different reason to what science does?

So if you're solo that's next to impossible and getting a pal to rub sun cream in all over your back for you is very likely to be met with a "get stuffed", even if they are starting out with you as you really want it applied 15-20 minutes before you go out and re-apply it after a couple of hours because the sweat will effect the protection so getting said riding partner to re-apply all over your sweaty body so that you don't get tan lines is again going to be met with more negatives/looks of 'what the fuck'. That's on top of the obvious stupidness of the idea.

What? I don't think I've ever seen anyone stop to re apply sun cream midride in the UK. So as the jerseu will clearly not let all UVA rays through i dont see why it woukd be needed under the jersey.

So you think a jersey that lets the skin go brown underneath it as per the pic above then you shouldn't need to add suncream underneath? what do you think is happening as to why the skin goes darker when exposed to sunlight, why do you think that the darkened skin shown in the pic underneath the jersey needs less protection than the skin exposed?

My point about re-application is that doing so when cycling so that even when wearing the jersey would be nonsense, jesus, please bother to understand plain English!

I don't see why more would be needed under the jersey than on arms and legs pre ride only should be fine in the UK. All day ride in hotter climates would be different I guess.

I wasn't arguing about the need for sun cream under the jersey only the suggestion of asking riding buddies to 're apply mid ride.

However I would point out that sun cream is not a total block it just increases the amount of time it takes for tanning/burning/damage to occur. Do you think the jersey is effectively SPF4 SPF16 SPF24 or more or less?

Jersey tan lanes are one thing and arguably almost a badge of honour for a cyclist but with this jersey I can loom forward to a heart rate monitor strap tan line which is probably quite hard to explain.

Avatar
HalfWheeler | 7 years ago
6 likes

Since when did tan lines become bad?

Avatar
MandaiMetric | 7 years ago
3 likes

Here's what skincancer.org says about these "good" UVA rays;

UVA contributes to and may even initiate the development of skin cancers.

Avatar
ConcordeCX replied to MandaiMetric | 7 years ago
3 likes

MandaiMetric wrote:

Here's what skincancer.org says about these "good" UVA rays;

UVA contributes to and may even initiate the development of skin cancers.

yea, but it's better than tan lines.

Avatar
BarryBianchi | 7 years ago
5 likes

I don't believe they didn't photoshop that.

Latest Comments