A crowdfunding campaign has been launched on Kickstarter for Tether, a handlebar-mounted cycling safety device that projects a “safe zone” around the bike, as well as identifying 'safe' and 'unsafe' roads by recording and plotting close passes.
> Why does road.cc run Near Miss of the Day videos?
Attached to your handlebars, Tether uses lasers to project 'the Bubble', a safe zone around your bike to encourage drivers to give you enough space as they overtake.
This concept is not new; Lezyne’s Laser Drive Rear 250, for example, beams two parallel lines on the ground to give drivers an idea of how wide you are on the road. However, when I reviewed this light, mounted at a height of 78.5cm, the gap between the lines is only about 1 metre in total – so that's 0.5 metres on either side. I had some concerns that some road users will interpret the lines as constituting a reasonable passing distance – Cycling UK cites 1.5m as the absolute minimum passing distance, so Lezyne's lane offering falls far short of that.
Tether’s option, on the other hand, comes with embedded sensors on the right, left and front, that continuously monitor and detect other road users and overtaking vehicles, and then publishing this in real time to a companion app.
“The sensors trigger a change in the projection when a car overtakes too closely and records the overtake distance,” explains the Peckham-based startup.
Passes within 1.5m trigger the sensors, and then when connected to the app via Bluetooth, the sensors pick up absolute distances up to 2.5m, to identify all overtakes whether they are too close or safe.
“Locations of overtakes are recorded along with the overtake distance to identify safe and unsafe zones in your city to help plan safer routing," says Tether.
Tether also says it hopes this data can also create a more informed strategy for the roll out of cycling infrastructure, something we've seen Strava do already with Metro that it claims is "the largest collection of human-powered transport information in the world."
Collecting data by users to provide improved and safer routing suggestions is also not new; Beeline’s recently updated Velo 2 navigation device allows riders to indicate if they are having a positive or negative experience on that particular section of road, by pressing the plus button as a ‘like’, or the minus button if it’s not so suitable.
The main difference between the two is that Tether bases its suggestions from physical data collected by sensors, whereas the Velo 2 is done purely on user feedback.
As the Velo 2 device is a GPS computer unit itself, it takes things further than the Tether by then also allowing you to select the ‘quiet route’ to your destination, guiding you on the roads other users determined as the safest.
Tether has been designed to attach to any handlebar, measuring 127mm x 74mm x 46mm. Prototypes use a rechargeable lithium battery and last up to 6 hours for continuous use, taking around an hour to fully charge.
£6,144 towards the £20,000 goal has been pledged so far, with 19 days to go, and the end date for the campaign is 27 November 2021. A beta edition of Tether is currently available for pre-ordering on Kickstarter, and pricing begins at £130 for the super earlybird discount.
All the usual Kickstarter rules and regulations apply which can be found here.
Add new comment
22 comments
All these technological advances become irrelevant when 2 important factors are taken into account:
It may be possible to find a BMW (other nutter drivers are available) driver who will pay attention to those 1.5 m lines illuminated on the road, but it won't be easy. The great majority will continue to come as close as they feel like when there's an oncoming vehicle to avoid, as they won't even consider slowing down or waiting to overtake.
The main objective of the police (with due respect to Inspector Kevin Smith and the Sheffield NW NPT), at least in Lancashire, is to think up reasons to not do anything. Any measuring device mounted on a bike will be described by them as uncalibrated, and will be completely disregarded.
Re BMW drivers. I'm sure this is just coincidence.
https://www.gloucestershirelive.co.uk/news/gloucester-news/black-bmw-fai...
Evening everyone, been reading this all with interest, (OB here creator of tether,)
Thanks for all the thoughtful comments, feedback and insights, its definitely given us a lot to think about. I would love to respond to all of these individually as well but just wanted to say a few things, as so many of you have taken the time to comment its the least we can do.
We've been working on tether for a year and a half, during that time we've had to manage the conflict between getting a visible projection, making it work universally on bikes, something that the cyclist on the street can install out of the box while measuring and mapping the distance of overtaking cars
this is v1.0 of the product which we will continue to refine with additional add ons (rear facing projection, add different colours different patterns, even a hear to say thankyou) add it to your scooter and eventually fully integrated into the bike.
The data to show overtaking cars and the location that they happen is what we've focussed on to make our product unique, there are so many amazing companies with great cycling products, Garmin, Blaze, Beeline, Lumos to name a few... we wanted to create something that helps cyclists understand where it is and isnt safe to cycle, to help people in charge of installing cycling lanes to know where to put them and how effective they are and to encourage better dialogue between cyclists and all road users.
In answer to some specific questions:
We're crowdfunding on Kickstarter because we're a small independent company trying to fix a big problem. Step 1 is to get this out to as many people as possible, so that we can begin gathering the data for where its safe and unsafe to cycle. Its the best way to travel after all.
Ride safe, ride happy and please contact or ping us a message or comment here if you need to know anything else.
OB & the tether team
The data mapping and reporting features sound similar to what see.sense claim to do with their lights, albeit for road surface conditions rather than for close passes.
Isn't this what Inspector Kevin was asking for in NMOTD 651.
I appreciate that this is a prototype and hasn't been fully developed, but where is the side firing gun for cars that come within a metre?
Besides, what is the point of having a light shining to the side when the driver will not be able to see it? Unless it shines 10m ahead and is extremely bright, it ain't gonna make no difference.
I thought the purpose of the projected light pattern was only to provide a reference grid against which to measure the distance of close passes. Not as a guide to motorists. Why else would it be a grid of dots rather than a single bright line at 1.5m?
If it is supposed to show motorists how far out to pass then I'd agree, it won't.
"the Peckham-based startup"
This time next year, Rodders, we'll be millionaires.
I thank you and will get my own coat.
Nice idea, but I don't trust electronic KickStarter products from unknown companies - there's just too many things to go wrong with the whole project.
Even better would be incorporating this kind of tech into bike cameras. I could imagine the end-game would be to fit a couple of cameras and they submit their own footage automatically to willing police departments.
fit a couple of cameras and they submit their own footage automatically to willing police departments
An automated system entirely compatible with the automated police system for filing online incident reports in the bin
The promotional picture shows poorly lit dots on the ground and does not cover the recommended 1.5m for safe overtakes. I wonder how bright they are in the daytime as well.
Think I'll save my money for now.
So it doesn't do anything useful, like make a camera recording of the offending incident ... it just enables you to plot where the incident happened?
Based on the article above, I would have thought that the device has more use for those that design our shared areas, rather than a useful tool for individual users.
What I would really like to see is a device like this, a Garmin Varia (or similar), a GPS and a 360-degree camera all syncing up so that you can produce videos of closs passes showing:
All overlaid neatly and clearly on a video of the incident.
Garmin are frustratingly close to that with the
so that this as an additional Ant+ distance sensor with an improved Connect App would bring it all together. How about it Garmin?
Actually I think the varia already does everything you need. It estimates passing distance and speed, just buries it in a connect field that's not well known about. So put it with a Virb360 and some better software and you are sorted.
https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2020/05/varia-radar-maps-connect-app.html
Given how its virtually indistinct on the sample photo of it in action on a normal road, I appreciate when moving its probably but better but still it's not exactly shouting for attention is it?
Also bluetooth is going to make it battery hungry both for the device & your companion app, ie phone.
I like the idea of a close pass sensor, partly to see how bad it is sometimes,but I dont think this is it.
From the promotional picture, I'm not sure that those dots are a. anywhere near visible enough, and b. actally spread out into anything like a wide enough area to actually suggest anything to a driver wanting to overtake.
If car companies added a sensor into the car that flashed up an alert on the dash when they pass too close it would probably make a bigger difference than anything a cyclist can actually do themselves.
What we need is to fit TCAS (traffic collision avoidance system) like they have on airplanes https://youtu.be/eK-ek-wKumk
In fairness to them, they do recognise that the current version isn't wide/visible enough, and list that as one of the things they're looking to improve in the final version.
I do find it difficult to see how they're going to get it to always project across the appropriate area, regardless of the design of bike and which part of it its attached to, though.
We need an international standard for beacons that can be easily detected by vehicle driver assistance or driverless vehicles for avoidance.
Since Euro standard mandated dipped beam permanently on we have lost some distinction from the general visual clutter and so safety.
Sadly existing Bluetooth does not have 100m range as required for moderate speeds to be effective.
One day, when all vehicles are connected that problem will be solved like it is in Aviation by ADB..
Is it clever enough to work out there are 2 lanes, or filtering left or on the right?
What about oncoming traffic?
Seems to be pushing towards victim blaming if it comes up with unsafe zones in your city - "you shouldn't be cycling here it is unsafe".
It would probably be better for battery life/disk capacity to just record the cars that pass safely.