- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Cross country mountain bikes
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
forum
Tandem
This morning I was passed by a tandem whose riders were wearing full British Cycling/Sky kit, so I assume they were on a training ride from the Manchester Velodrome.
The rider on the front was a big unit while the the one behind was considerably smaller. This got me thinking about aerodynamics, presumably BC/Sky test these things, but wouln't it be more efficient to have the smaller rider at the front?
If you're new please join in and if you have questions pop them below and the forum regulars will answer as best we can.
Latest Forum Topics
Latest Comments
- Simon E 5 min 41 sec ago
£1.8bn sales for components division. Yeah, they're dead in the water. Or did I misunderstand due to your piss-poor grammar?
- mdavidford 8 min 25 sec ago
That only holds if the 4% always pass within 1.5m, though. Given that at least some people will pass wider only some of the time, you've overstated...
- Bmblbzzz 29 min 58 sec ago
"A brutalist interpretation of a road" So true. Grey markings on grey paving slabs surrounded by other grey paving slabs...
- Simon E 13 min 38 sec ago
Driver in a Citroen travelling at 70mph crashes into the front of a house in Canterbury Road, Faversham at 5.30am on Sunday....
- arichman 1 hour 2 min ago
Somewhat confusingly, Velocio includes both a fit and a size chart, and says to use the fit chart (which uses height and weight) as the guide for...
- wtjs 2 hours 23 min ago
I can't find anbody else with this problem, so I'm putting it here. I went to visit a friend near Chester, using the excellent Merseyrail cycle...
- Rendel Harris 2 hours 27 min ago
"you give 100% to your sport and your country" – hoping in exchange to gain a considerable amount of fame and accompanying fortune, it's not really...
- Rendel Harris 4 hours 36 min ago
As I said below, being from the same neck of the woods I know that the primary demographic of the core support of WDAG is folks living in the roads...
Add new comment
2 comments
Not sure about the aerodynamics, but having the heavier person at the front gives better handling. Having said that, there are a few examples of tandem pairs with a heavier stoker, so it can be done the other way round. Some years ago, someone had the brilliant idea that the way to improve tandem aerodynamics was to have the front rider facing backwards (the rear rider steering). Apparently it worked, but as the rear rider had almost zero forward visibility the position was banned.
What is the small rider was blind/visually impaired? How are they going to be able to steer the tandem? What you describe is Craig MacLean and Neil Fachie