Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

24 hrs in A&E

Why is that programmes like these always contain cycling injuries and not that many car ones when they would be far greater in numbers.

should we see them showing more of us as a positive (as of course they tend to be London hospitals) or a negative ?

If you're new please join in and if you have questions pop them below and the forum regulars will answer as best we can.

Add new comment

3 comments

Avatar
crikey | 9 years ago
0 likes

It's because if you manage to injure yourself in a car, with crumple zones and seat belts and airbags, the likelihood is that you have been involved in a high speed, high energy, high deceleration incident and wouldn't be spending that much time in A&E; you would be heading for theatre or ITU quite quickly.

You have to try pretty hard to come to grief in a car crash these days; hence the attitude of many drivers; we've made driving safe and have shifted the injury/death onto pedestrians and cyclists...

Avatar
ianrobo | 9 years ago
0 likes

It has becoming a running in joke with the Mrs, she likes these kind of A&E porn shows and it is like, yet another cyclist, I will be OK !

If the same proportion was shown with car accidents ...

Avatar
Stumps | 9 years ago
0 likes

Its difficult to call really. More publicty would generally mean a good thing but it can be turned on its head and be put along the lines of they shouldn't use the roads.

I see enough death and destruction at work so i generally dont watch those sort of programmes.

Latest Comments