Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

New Lezyne GPS nav

Want GPS primarily for navigation rather than data or as a training aid, but would like that information too.

Leaning towards the new Lezyne Super GPS however have some reservations; navigation is breadcrumb only and requires pairing with a phone. In my case as the owner of a shitty old iphone I'd need to buy a new one with all the hassle that entails (though I'll probably be forced to get a new one soon anyway). No reviews yet either, has anybody tried one?

Not so enamoured with a Garmin as read a lot saying that navigation is still a bit sketchy with turn by turn often not working correctly, at least with the 520 and 820. Not so hot on the 1000 for size and price. Not sure I can be arsed buying an older model second hand and then selling it if I don't like it (I'm a lazy cunt). Am I reading over picky reviews? As Garmins are ubiquitous they can't be that bad but as nav is my most important consideration I'm hesitant. The Lezyne just seems better value for money. 

If you're new please join in and if you have questions pop them below and the forum regulars will answer as best we can.

Add new comment

4 comments

Avatar
Colin Peyresourde | 8 years ago
0 likes

Agree with Macrophotofly's first and second post.

Using a phone is far from ideal (either as primary or secondary GPS) as you will wear down the battery. A good Cycling specific GPS, if properly charged, will last you a good 10hrs or more.

That said, if you are only doing shorter rides (1hr 30mins max) then a phone is probably all you need.

When I did my riding on my own a GPS unit was invaluable. The breadcrumb trail is useful, but it's only as good as mapping software used to plot a route. I've been out on rides on which my 810 has taken me through muddy bridleways - which obviously a 510 wouldn't be able to help you circumnavigate to pick up your plotted route (although, faced with the options, I chose to ride the bridleway in most cases).

Avatar
longassballs | 8 years ago
0 likes

Wow, thanks for the rather comprehensive reply! On first sight I did think it could only be a cut & paste affair, upon reading that it isn't so it's very much appreciated, macrophotofly.

Everything you wrote was very illuminating and you've changed my mind. Seems like the 1000, and to a lesser extent the 820, is the only real option.  I also wonder if the 520 will do, being that you can upload .gpx files to it too even if it wasn't necessarily designed for navigation. Many thanks again for taking the time to reply.

Avatar
macrophotofly replied to longassballs | 8 years ago
0 likes

longassballs wrote:

Wow, thanks for the rather comprehensive reply!

No Problem. It was a specifc answer to your issue but I am often asked something similar (verbally) by cyclists turning up in Tokyo for the first time - so some of the constituent parts were advice I regularly pass on.

I also think the response from SuperPython is interesting. I have long thought an old iPhone 4 or 4S would make a perfect-sized bike computer. A waterproof case for it (getting increasingly hard to find) fixes the first problem. The other three problems I have found harder to fix.

  1. Battery life. If you are constantly map reading then the screen needs to stay on. As I mentioned the garmins tend to last 7-8 hours. I've never managed to get the iPhone4 to last longer than 4hrs (may be Super Pythin can comment on battery life for the S2?) with the screen always on. If your rides are all less than 4 hours then it might not matter
  2. OS upgrades. The iPhone 4 was speedy when it first came out but the latest iOS versions seem to have slowed it down. Sure some tech person out there can advise what to do. Rolling back to iOS 6 or something might be possible but then I am not sure the latest version of the Strava or RWGPS Apps will run on it.
  3. Altimeter.  e.g. Strava app as your ride-recording-on-a-phone is useless at getting the height you have climbed right. It uses every deviation on the base map and as a result hopelessly over-calculates it. Here in the Japanese mountains we see riders, using phone apps to record their rides, showing total meters climbed being between x2 and x2.5 of what has actually been climbed. The Garmins calculate height using pressure change and whilst that has some inaccuracies (especially if a weather system moves over while in the middle of your ride) it is still a heck of a lot more accurate than the phone
Avatar
macrophotofly | 8 years ago
2 likes

I live in Japan and whilst I may be able to speak the language now, reading it is (and speaking it was, when I first arrived) another thing. So like many of my non-Japanese cycling breathren, here, a navigating GPS is nearly essential - especially when you are heading up some 1000m+ remote rindo (closed road) toge (pass) and want to get back to Tokyo for tea. Hence based on my experience and those around me in the local club -

  • Presuming you have basic map reading skills, don't bother with turn-by-turn. It was designed for people who wanted to get somewhere in a car, at 30mph+ and think a map is something the passenger sitting next to them understands.
  • Breadcrumb is okay but nothing beats looking at an overhead map with a nice coloured line showing you the way to go. If you miss a turn it's easy to look on the map and figure out if you can get back on your route at a later point, without having to retrace every step. More importantly you can often find the reality of the road doesn't exactly match what was planned on a website - if your road disolves into a rock-strewn muddy path then it is easy to look at a map on the screen and work a way round.
  • The Garmin 800, 810, 820 and 1000 all work well for following routes. The screen size on the 1000 is a real bonus if you are following a map, although I survived perfectly well on an 800 for 4 years. Real world issues with Garmins are mostly the occasional lost ride - what we refer to as a GarminFart (more prevalent on an 800 than the  810 which in turn is more than the 1000 - can't comment on the newer 820. Personally I have not lost a ride on my 1000 after a year so far and only lost 2 on my 800 after four); battery life (you can't charge an 800 on the go without a special cable or it loses the ride; 810 and 1000 usually last around 7-8 hours max on map reading but can be charged up); and the odd interface glitch.
  • We plan or share routes before we go out on sites like RWGPS and uploading them to a Garmin is simplicty in itself. Likewise getting maps for the Garmin for new areas/countries is simple these days - you can download free and legit from the internet (openstreetmap)
  • Leave your phone for emergency calls, messaging the loved one that you will be home a tad later than you mentioned, and the odd photo. Get the Garmin to do work of guiding you around and tracking your ride.
  • Bear in mind device size is not a problem if you keep it relatively parallel to the ground - point the Garmin (or any phone/GPS device) upwards like some kind of heads-up display and its adding to the air resistance.

Latest Comments