John has been writing about bikes and cycling for over 30 years since discovering that people were mug enough to pay him for it rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work.
He was heavily involved in the mountain bike boom of the late 1980s as a racer, team manager and race promoter, and that led to writing for Mountain Biking UK magazine shortly after its inception. He got the gig by phoning up the editor and telling him the magazine was rubbish and he could do better. Rather than telling him to get lost, MBUK editor Tym Manley called John’s bluff and the rest is history.
Since then he has worked on MTB Pro magazine and was editor of Maximum Mountain Bike and Australian Mountain Bike magazines, before switching to the web in 2000 to work for CyclingNews.com. Along with road.cc founder Tony Farrelly, John was on the launch team for BikeRadar.com and subsequently became editor in chief of Future Publishing’s group of cycling magazines and websites, including Cycling Plus, MBUK, What Mountain Bike and Procycling.
John has also written for Cyclist magazine, edited the BikeMagic website and was founding editor of TotalWomensCycling.com before handing over to someone far more representative of the site's main audience.
He joined road.cc in 2013. He lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.
Add new comment
6 comments
Pie in the sky.
People have been banging on about opening the line for at least 20 years so don't worry,taxpayers money is safe.
Anything that involves infrastructure work being done in Bedfordshire doesn't happen. Unless it involves building houses where the local dignitaries get back handers from developers......did I say that out loud?
The closest thing to this that exists at the moment is Richard's Cam-Ox route, which is pretty direct at 84 miles:
http://www.squarewheels.org.uk/bike/routeCamOx/
But it's on road - so while it's fine for me, most people probably wouldn't consider it.
It would add lots to the overall cost, I'm afraid. Most of the trackbed between Bicester and Bletchley is intact, and Oxford to Bicester is already in use (apart from the temporary closure at present for upgrade works). Putting a cycle track alongside a double-track electrified railway would require reconstructing all the cuttings and embankments, let alone the safety fencing that would no doubt be required.
The Cambridge to Bedford section is a more plausible idea, if the direct route for that is ever rebuilt. But then part of that (from Bedford to Sandy) already has a cycle path on the old trackbed anyway!
I tend to agree with Cambridge Cycling Campaign on this. Great if it can be done for minimal cost, but otherwise, let's spend the money on traffic-free routes where people really want to go. Feed-in routes from orbital towns/villages to cities will get the most bang per buck, not long-distance superhighways through fairly remote countryside.
Huh. You can prove anything with facts.
Why would you not do this? It would add peanuts to the overall cost. Make it wide enough and the two Universities could have a boat-race on bikes.
Ha Ha you're right a train between Bedford and Cambs is 2h20 minimum and that *doesnt* include travel to and from stations, and is ~£50 for a single. What a joke.