- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Laura Trott (copyright John Stevenson)Laura Trott changes her mind on helmets
Olympic cycling star Laura Trott has changed her mind on whether wearing cycle helmets should be a legal requirement. While she still thinks helmets prevent major injuries, the 21-year-old now thinks helmet use should be a matter of "personal discretion".
Speaking at the Olympic Velodrome at Lee Valley Velopark last week, Trott reiterated that her sister’s crash had convinced her of the benefits of helmets.
"I cycle a lot around roads and I would always wear a helmet," she told Rob Virtue of wharf.co.uk. "I've been out with my sister when she crashed and it just showed me how a helmet prevents major injuries.”
Emma Trott, who is two years older than her sister, was one of five British riders hit by a car in Belgium in 2010
But in a change from her previous comments Laura Trott added: "But it's also something that should be at your personal discretion. If you want to wear it, wear it, if you don't, then don't."
Last year, the Wiggle-Honda rider attracted vociferous criticism when she implied that cyclists sometimes have only themselves to blame should they get hit by a vehicle. “It’s not always the car’s fault,” she said.
At the time, Trott was speaking in her role as one of Mayor of London Boris Johnson’s cycling ambassadors.
“It should be a legal requirement to wear a helmet,” she said. “So many lives have been saved by them and it saved my sister’s life.”
However, Boris Johnson’s own cycling commissioner Andrew Gilligan believes helmets have no proven benefits and refuses to wear one.
The benefits of helmet use is one of the most hotly contested topics in cycling. British Cycling policy advisor Chris Boardman recently called for the debate to be put to bed as it had become a distraction from the bigger issues of making cycling safer by building segregated infrastructure and improving vehicle design.
In an interview with road.cc, Boardman said that helmet use was “not even in the top 10 of things you need to do to keep cycling safe or more widely, save the most lives.”
Studies based on A&E admissions often conclude that helmets are effective at preventing head injury. But this effect vanishes when data from larger groups of cyclists are examined.
In 2005, researcher PJ Hewson analysed police STATS19 data on traffic collisions and concluded: “There is no evidence that cycle helmets reduce the overall cyclist injury burden at the population level in the UK when data on road casualties is examined.”
In a 2006 paper for the British Medical Journal, researcher Dorre Robinson, also working with whole-population data for injury rates concluded that there was no clear evidence of the effectiveness of making helmets compulsory.
John has been writing about bikes and cycling for over 30 years since discovering that people were mug enough to pay him for it rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work.
He was heavily involved in the mountain bike boom of the late 1980s as a racer, team manager and race promoter, and that led to writing for Mountain Biking UK magazine shortly after its inception. He got the gig by phoning up the editor and telling him the magazine was rubbish and he could do better. Rather than telling him to get lost, MBUK editor Tym Manley called John’s bluff and the rest is history.
Since then he has worked on MTB Pro magazine and was editor of Maximum Mountain Bike and Australian Mountain Bike magazines, before switching to the web in 2000 to work for CyclingNews.com. Along with road.cc founder Tony Farrelly, John was on the launch team for BikeRadar.com and subsequently became editor in chief of Future Publishing’s group of cycling magazines and websites, including Cycling Plus, MBUK, What Mountain Bike and Procycling.
John has also written for Cyclist magazine, edited the BikeMagic website and was founding editor of TotalWomensCycling.com before handing over to someone far more representative of the site's main audience.
He joined road.cc in 2013. He lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.
Latest Comments
- Rendel Harris 1 hour 2 min ago
As what you have said is demonstrably untrue, given that the event is organised and has been for the last four years by a professional events...
- chrisonabike 1 hour 31 min ago
Accessibility issue. Of course by necessity / co- evolution the Dutch generally provide a fairly "one size fits standard bikes" parking solution -...
- Kapelmuur 1 hour 41 min ago
Thanks for the heads up. I wore it the first time the temperature fell below 10C, with a merino base layer. A short ride of about 90 minutes, I...
- Steve K 2 hours 45 min ago
I'm there now too, if anyone wants a follow/wants to follow me. @cyclingtheseaso
- Shepton 3 hours 21 min ago
I totally agree. I used to commute through Long Ashton and only started getting agro from motorists when the pavement was made to be a shared path....
- Rendel Harris 3 hours 45 min ago
She was still there in Greenwich when I cycled past her on Wednesday!
- Rendel Harris 3 hours 55 min ago
It's obviously a very personal thing but if I was in the market at your budget I would take a serious look at the Ribble AllRoad SL Pro, currently...
- Hirsute 5 hours 46 min ago
No driver involved https://www.gazette-news.co.uk/news/24728452.car-crash-station-way-colch...
Add new comment
88 comments
Laura Trott is a nice lady and a great cyclist.
I'm not sure why her views on helmet wearing are any more informed than the average persons.
Helmets are useful in cycle racing. They may mitigate some low energy impacts between 50 and 100 joules of Kinetic energy. So if you are racing and therefore falling off amongst a load of pedals it may be of some use in stopping a head wound being more serious.
If you get hit by a car even a small one like a Smart Car and even at low speed say 10 mph. Then the impact energy is up round 7000 joules. Helmet completely useless.
That's just 10mph hit by a smart car.
As I have said before a helmet is not designed for nor has any chance of protecting you against vehicle impacts. You'll get just as much protection from a lucky rabbits foot in your saddle bag.
Nice lady though is Laura.
I wear a helmet, 95% percent of the time. Because sometimes I fall off, being a bit clumsy. And at times I've managed to whack my noggin into a branch or similar, so the helmet keeps my scalp attached.
For commuting, I also have the helmet cam on it.
I most certainly don't wear it because it'll help me when I get hit by a car at speed, a bus... or whatever else which would inflict massive traumatic crush injuries.
Helmets do not help (appreciably) in the majority of road traffic collisions that result in major injury. I've not seen any record of any accident where I believe the helmet (or lack of) made any difference with fatal accidents, as those tend to be people being run over.
But... in other news, good for Miss trott... having the ability to adapt a view for a more positive public perception.
Now, on to the important argument... how do we stop cyclists getting run down on our roads?
'Now, on to the important argument... how do we stop cyclists getting run down on our roads?'
Easy! or not so easy!
Increased public funding for cycle infrastructure for about a decade! Current funding is pitiful considering the Government has pledged £500 million for all of Britain over the next 3 years. In reality, this figure should equate to around £10 per head, so £10 x 60 million people in Britain = £600 million per annum for the next ten years should see us on the right track (excuse the pun).
Funding needs to be combined with a long term vision or strategy say approximately a 20 - 25 year policy. Politicians go for big ticket ideas, something they can hang their hat on, so therefore cycling needs to be packaged up to look like a big project.
That is the general consensus among experts. I am writing my dissertation on this subject so have spoke to a number of people on this issue.
Why can she not have an opinion ? you lot slate her and now under pressure she has backed down, I find it all sad to be honest.
You lot want personal choice, great have it, in fact you have it, its not a legal requirement, but for christ sake stop having a go at somebody because their personal choice is to say you should be wearing one.
You have your opinion, she has (or had) hers, to call her an idiot because she doesn't agree with your views is appalling.
Finally a sound comment.
Opinions are like a'holes everyone has one.
I suspect Miss Trott may have been interviewed by that fine body the press on the subject again.
So gave a response which has now been re quoted by the press on a cycling website with the usual vociferous responses.
Or maybe her sponsors would like her to promote the use of helmets as Wiggle do sell them I think, who knows or really honestly cares.
Oh of course the visitors to road.cc do so they can grind their axes.
I personally just enjoy riding thankfully.
Laura Trott is entitled to hold whatever views she likes and we can choose to either agree or not.
She is also entitled to change those views. In fact doing shows that she is able to consider things and not simply stick rigidly to what she previously thought.
I can't see any justification for calling her an "idiot" on this basis.
Wouldn't it be so much nicer if people behaved like grown-ups?
I agree totally with Laura Trott, it should be through personal discretion. I feel that one should choose to wear a helmet, as I do without exception. However, as for making it a legal requirement to wear a helmet I am not so sure about. We are trying in this country to promote cycling as a alternative mode of transport, the introduction of compulsory head gear for cyclists has proved to decrease cycling numbers in countries where helmets have been made compulsory. I believe that everyone should wear a helmet through choice and common sense, however, forcing cyclist to wear helmets will in my opinion only decrease cyclist numbers in a time when we are trying to encourage an increase in cycling.
Until there is solid evidence and a scientific consensus that compulsory helmet use overall has more health benefits than the status quo, there should be no law enforcing it.
And why, is it considered 'idiotic' choosing to not wear a helmet? I know a lot of intelligent people who choose not to wear a helmet. Probably for the same reason they choose not to wear a full body armour suit. Or choose not to stay inside for fear of pianos falling on them.
There's a limit to precautionary measures: the very act of living on Earth carries a risk. There are far, FAR better ways to improve your safety on the road, than wearing a helmet (the best being approved cycle training).
Personal choice wins for sure. I choose to wear one.
For the myriad 'mate was wearing a helmet, had a crash, still got injured' stories I've yet to see a single 'mate was wearing a helmet, had a crash, still got injured, wished they hadn't been wearing a helmet' one.
Wasn't there a link that showed in some cases helmets caused other fatal injuries, something to do with increased friction and causing necks to twist etc?
This reads like some very bad science, so hopefully somebody a tad more clued up than me will dig out the relevant information.
Given that every other sprint finish seems to involve a multiple pile up, I've yet to see any racer get a broken neck from wearing his helmet....
I have never been involved in a bunch sprint pile up on my way to the shops or to work.
I once had a lazy, slow fall warming up for an MTB event, and was completely surprised to smack my head.
I was wearing a helmet and ended up with a concussion. I am as adamant as those that say a helmet saved their life, that the only reason I banged my head on that occasion was because I'd significantly increased its volume by putting a great big helmet on it.
Now, I may be completely wrong in this opinion, the reality is that no one knows for sure, but I still have it... I just wanted to share with you, as given the choice, however rightly or wrongly, given the same circumstances, I'd have opted to try the crash sans helmet.
Well, you asked for it, the parents of these children will be wishing they didn't wear helmets:
Child deaths due to cycle helmets
What a load of bollocks, strangulations due to wearing them off the bike mostly, you know, the kind of thing that can happen with a scarf, only a scarf doesn't come with a warning sticker, label and handbook, bike hat does.
speaking from personal experience, my opinion is helmets should be compulsory, however everyone should have their own opinion. if it wasn't for a helmet my brother would probably not have survived his crash, the whole of the back of the helmet was destroyed but he only came away with a concussion. whilst not everyone wears one i strongly urge you to do so
May I ask why your brother crashed? a "racing" incident or hit by a car?
We were both coming down a hill, think we hit about 60-70 kph, and just before the bottom there was a small speed bump, we both hit it and he just flipped. the speed bump in question was virtually invisible because of shadows and the light. i should point out that my brothers been riding longer than me and is very experienced so how he flipped is beyond me
We were both coming down a hill, think we hit about 60-70 kph, and just before the bottom there was a small speed bump, we both hit it and he just flipped. the speed bump in question was virtually invisible because of shadows and the light. i should point out that my brothers been riding longer than me and is very experienced so how he flipped is beyond me
Thanks, what you are describing is for better want of a term a racing accident. A million miles from some riding into town to do the shopping on a "fiet". Is what is appropriate to one valid for the other? I would say no. Best parallel, do you expect drivers to wear flameproof overalls to drive to work?
Well that puts the impact about 16 to 20 times the maximum the helmet is designed for. And do you think you would still have done 60-70kph if you had not been wearing a helmet?
What mandatory helmets did for New Zealand:
New Zealand Helmet Graph.jpg
this girl's an idiot imo
Why might I ask?
Everyone is entitled to an opinion. it may be wrong, but that doesn't mean you can't have it.
Sooner people stop focusing on helmets and start asking why cyclists are getting hit by cars the better! Might be me, I might be odd, but i'd rather not find out how effective or ineffective a helmet is if I get hit by a car.
I'd come up with a witty repost to your unsubstantiated, unpleasant statement that emphasised the critical need to focus on evidence-based population-level science whilst maintaining a sense of personal responsibility and appreciation for confounding factors influencing takeup (or lack thereof) of utility cycling for the common good, but can't be arsed.
Helmet didn't prevent my friend from sustaining major injuries. Depressed fracture of cheek bone and traumatic brain injury.
Light the blue touchpaper and retire...
Pages