Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Top Gear producer: Cycle safety piece wasn't anti-cyclist, aimed to promote mutual respect on the road

Andy Wilman defends BBC show following complaint over Jeremy Clarkson and James May's cycle safety film efforts...

The executive producer of the BBC motoring programme Top Gear has defended a segment regarding cycle safety aired earlier this month in which presenters Jeremy Clarkson and James May, claiming it was not biased against cyclists and that it’s main message was that “motorists and cyclists should show respect.”

Andy Wilman was responding to a complaint made to the BBC about the programme, which aired on Sunday 2 March, by road.cc reader Adam Rees who forwarded us a copy of the reply.

As the comments to our article on the programme showed, it divided cyclists, some saying it trivialised the issues, while others insisted that since Top Gear is a light entertainment programme characterised by an irreverent approach to its subject, it shouldn't be taken seriously.

The issue of cycle safety is a serious one – more than 100 cyclists are killed on Britain’s roads each year, and thousands more seriously injured – but referring to the overall tone of the segment, Mr Wilman said: “The Top Gear film on cycling was always going to be done in a Top Gear tone, and I believe justifiably so.”

The show followed Jeremy Clarkson and James May as the attempted to make a cycle safety public information film to present to a panel including British Cycling policy advisor Chris Boardman at Westminster Council.

Their efforts weren’t well received, with the first film presented giving advice to cyclists to work harder so they could buy a car – a well-worn joke of Clarkson’s – and another telling them act their age and buy a car.

Mr Wilman said that those first two films were “specifically made to be absurd, and the joke here is centred on the hopeless misinterpretation by Jeremy and James of the brief given to them by Westminster Council.”

The programme also showed Clarkson and May riding through London’s West End, the former opining that since he was riding a bike, he could ignore red lights, which was the subject of another film the pair produced which told cyclists: “Red and Green. Learn the bloody difference.”

According to Mr Wilman, that reflected “a common perception of cyclists,” but he insisted that otherwise, May and Clarkson were “not critical of cyclists.”

“At what point does the film say cyclists should not be treated with respect on the road?,” said Mr Wilman. “It doesn’t – when Jeremy and James go out on their fact finding cycle around London, they make it clear that they believe buses to be the main danger point.”

But in London, it is in fact lorries that present the greatest threat to the safety of cyclists. Making up 2 per cent of the city’s traffic, they are involved in more than half of cyclist fatalities.

The show, which included images of mangled bikes and one sequence that showed a basket of fruit and vegetables being dropped from a height, supposed to represent a dead cyclist, followed by a bicycle.

Debbie Dorling, whose husband Brian was killed by a lorry at Bow Roundabout in October 2011 told road.cc after the programme aired that she had tuned in as a fan of the show, but had found that sequence particularly “distressing.”

She also said that she believed the programme had “totally missed the point of cycle safety.”

In his reply to Mr Rees, however, Mr Wilman insisted that the point of the programme was to reinforce the need for mutual respect between road users, whether on two wheels or four.

“The end film does state that both cyclists and drivers should respect each other on the road, and surely that is the important point Top Gear can get across,” he said.  “Does it matter if we make childish jokes about cyclists’ clothes or body odour as long as we advocate that both parties respect each other’s road space?”

He concluded: “I would also say that although Top Gear brings its own distinct voice to the cycling/motoring issue, we are at least bringing more awareness to the debate, and if the main message from a such a car based programme is that motorists and cyclists should show respect, then that’s ultimately to the good.”

The programme is still available to watch on BBC iPlayer until tomorrow, Sunday 23 March.

Is the executive producer's rejection of criticism of the show justified? Did Top Gear really bring more awareness to the road safety debate and highlight that there should be respect between cyclists and drivers? Let us know in the comments.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

40 comments

Avatar
Anthony2303 | 10 years ago
0 likes

Working in the caravan industry I a used to Clarkson being like this. Most of what he doe is well planned to create controversy and so get more viewing figures. After all he owns part of the program so why would he want anything else?

As pointed out though, a lot of people out there do like to emulate him and this could only be a bad thing for cyclists.

If nothing else, he has got us talking about both him and the show, free publicity?

Avatar
Paul_C | 10 years ago
0 likes

to put it politely, he's a Complete Utter Numpty Twonk...

Avatar
SimpleSimon | 10 years ago
0 likes

I think the concern is that there actually are people who think JC is like JC! They believe him and therefore think they should belittle cyclists and not take them seriously either.

Right thinking people everywhere know that JC likes being a bit silly, and sometimes it makes amusing TV, but not everyone is able to apply the filter to what he says and realise that he is not really serious.

You just have to look at some of the videos on this site to see how many motorists treat many cyclists with no respect to appreciate that there are those who actually do what JC says!

Avatar
Fatbagman | 10 years ago
0 likes

This chap is obviously so far up clarksons arse he can see mays boots. While you don't expect this show to produce factual information to trivialise people getting killed is in poor taste. As they didn't mention trucks how can they say got any safety points across?

Avatar
BarefootBrian | 10 years ago
0 likes

Anybody who takes Top Gear seriously has completely missed the point. Clarkson has demonstrated that whatever subject he covers his main aim is to mock that group of people (as well as being a cyclist I am also a caravanner!). It is just a shame that he thinks it is okay to make programs that will obviously upset people - there again, maybe he is so insensitive that he is unaware of the possible impact of his drivel.

Avatar
sidesaddle replied to BarefootBrian | 10 years ago
0 likes
BarefootBrian wrote:

Anybody who takes Top Gear seriously has completely missed the point. Clarkson has demonstrated that whatever subject he covers his main aim is to mock that group of people (as well as being a cyclist I am also a caravanner!). [i]It is just a shame that he thinks it is okay to make programs that will obviously upset people[/i] - there again, maybe he is so insensitive that he is unaware of the possible impact of his drivel.

It is precisely because this is the only programme that dares to deliberately upset people that makes it so loved and so popular throughout the world (excluding USA). Any group with a specific interest will tend to get very up itself and defensive to outside intrusion. Cyclists, caravanners, bird-watchers, Morris Marina owners, women, whatever are fair game to a group of very clever performers who know exactly how stay just the right side of the line while making it very clear where their loyalties lie. Wonder how Hammond felt about this segment, and why he wasn't on it in the first place.

Avatar
SteppenHerring replied to sidesaddle | 10 years ago
0 likes
sidesaddle wrote:
BarefootBrian wrote:

Anybody who takes Top Gear seriously has completely missed the point. Clarkson has demonstrated that whatever subject he covers his main aim is to mock that group of people (as well as being a cyclist I am also a caravanner!). [i]It is just a shame that he thinks it is okay to make programs that will obviously upset people[/i] - there again, maybe he is so insensitive that he is unaware of the possible impact of his drivel.

It is precisely because this is the only programme that dares to deliberately upset people that makes it so loved and so popular throughout the world (excluding USA). Any group with a specific interest will tend to get very up itself and defensive to outside intrusion. Cyclists, caravanners, bird-watchers, Morris Marina owners, women, whatever are fair game to a group of very clever performers who know exactly how stay just the right side of the line while making it very clear where their loyalties lie. Wonder how Hammond felt about this segment, and why he wasn't on it in the first place.

See also UKIP. And imagine a Venn diagram of TG fans and UKIP sympathisers.

I would take issue though with "Any group with a specific interest". I think me not being killed or injured, my son not being killed or injured and my friends not being killed or injured hardly counts as a "specific interest".

Avatar
gazza_d | 10 years ago
0 likes

It was anti-cyclist in a very passive aggressive way.

Managed to convey all the stereotypes such as being poor, jumping lights and being overly self-righteous, without even making an effort to explode those myths, which just reinforces some peoples mindsets.

Avatar
Mart | 10 years ago
0 likes

So, anti cyclist states he's not anti cyclist, its just misunderstood jokes. Perhaps he finds the thousands people seriously injured and killed on our roads a funny subject, I just can't see the funny side.

Avatar
jmaccelari | 10 years ago
0 likes

IMHO, the insert was not 'anti'-cyclist. It did bring out some of the problems cyclists face, so I was quite surprised. Not what I expected from Clarkson et al.
However, being a TopGear production, trying to ascribe any form of educational value to it is like trying to wring some moral philosophy out of a Dennis the Menace cartoon.

Pages

Latest Comments