Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Cycle-friendly improvements to Bristol railway bridge forecast to annoy drivers

£308,000 changes to railway bridge pinch-point ahead of council's summer cycle strategy announcement - local paper prophecies doom...

Plans for a new £380,000 cycling-friendly traffic system in Bristol have been released for public consultation, but the Bristol Post suggests the move will not be popular with drivers.

Meanwhile, a council spokeswoman has said that the council's wide-ranging cycling strategy for the next decade "will be ready for public consultation in the summer."

The new system, on St Luke’s Road, would see shuttle signals installed to save space and reduce traffic under a railway bridge making the road single-file and the traffic sequentially one directional.

The installation of the lights would separate the road traffic from cyclists and walkers through the creation of a raised route alongside the road.

The lights would also be connected to nearby traffic lights on York Street to help the traffic flow efficiently.

The Bristol newspaper speculated that drivers would be dismayed by the introduction of the shuttle lights, but also quoted the city’s mayor, George Ferguson, who said the project will be the “first step towards making this part of Bristol a more accessible, safer and pleasant place to walk and cycle".

These plans come alongside the release of council data which shows a 40 per cent drop from 2012 in cyclists killed or seriously injured on Bristol streets.

The public consultation leaflet - which was distributed around the city - also included plans for new cycle ramps on and off the nearby, pedestrian Banana Bridge over the Avon.

The ramps will connect cyclists from the south side of the river to the segregated cycle lanes on Clarence Road which are currently under development.

The proposed road traffic changes will stretch from Temple Meads train station, 700 metres along the bank of River Avon to Redcliffe.

The consultation leaflets which were released by the council highlight Bristol’s intimidating road environment, blaming the narrowness of the city’s traffic lanes and footpaths for that alongside a list of the infrastructure changes planned to the St Luke’s Road railway bridge and surrounding area.

These cycle-friendly improvements to the city’s roads - if the public consultation is successful - will come ahead the announcement of the city’s Cycling Strategy, which is expected to include a large network of cross-city cycle lanes.

Bristol Council were due to begin public consultation on plans for a Dutch-style network of cycle routes in the city earlier this year after the Bristol Cycling Campaign (BCC) proposed the idea within their Bristol Cycling Manifesto in October.

The manifesto called for an investment of £109 million over 12 years to quadruple the level of bike use in the city.

Council spokeswoman Julia Walton told the Bristol Post that the council is working on a wide-ranging cycling strategy for the city to set common goals for the next ten years in order to attract funding for infrastructure and community projects.

She said: “[The strategy] will set out the ways that the council with partners can help cycling become a normal, as opposed to specialised, way of getting around the city”.

“We anticipate it will be ready for public consultation in the summer."

The council's announcement of improvements to the city's road infrastructure for cyclists has coincided with the release of council data showing that serious injuries and deaths to cyclists have continued to fall in the city.

New council figures show there were 19 cyclists killed or seriously injured in road traffic collisions in 2013 including one fatality and 18 seriously injured.

This represents a 40 per cent drop from 2012 which in turn was 35 per cent lower than in 2011.

Add new comment

15 comments

Avatar
jazzdude | 10 years ago
0 likes

I sympathise with motorists. There should be a completely separate bridge built for a dedicated cycleway.

Avatar
faz. | 10 years ago
0 likes

That looks tragic.

Avatar
alexwheeler0 | 10 years ago
0 likes

I live here and more than anything, this seems like a waste of money.
Yes under the bridge is tight, same with the current walk way, but most people just slow down and take care.
The traffic in the morning is shocking and constricting it any more is pointless.
IMO, the council is adding bike facilities for the sake of it rather than to the benefit of cyclists.

Avatar
seven | 10 years ago
0 likes

You've got to give the local rags a break, a lot of them have their print editions dying a death and need to whip up a froth online to try and make a bit of cash. By far the easiest way to do this is to invoke the universal "motorists as persecuted group" mentality and get the numbskulls out in force venting their spleens. Each locality has its own other hot-button topics (e.g. here in Edinburgh it's the trams) and there are other universal favourites like parking, or more than tuppence being spent on cycle-specific infrastructure... but they are all related to the great bogeyman of the poor, defenceless, hard-pressed motorist having his/her liberties curtailed yet again.

NB: This isn't a comment on the proposal in question; I don't know enough about it (although that seems little impediment to being allowed to pass judgement on things these days).

Avatar
Neil753 | 10 years ago
0 likes

One of the most barking schemes I've ever seen, and likely to result in plenty of pedestrian/biker conflict, additional pollution, and a thousand punishment passes every day. Plus the loss of a staggering amount of public cash into the pockets of whichever contractor's turn it is to submit a bid just slightly lower than their mates.

Seriously, all you need is three bollards, two "no vehicular traffic" signs, and the job is done. This is one location where prohibition of traffic is extremely viable, and could so easily be used as an example of how selective road closures might well be the key to getting people on their bikes.

Avatar
Nixster | 10 years ago
0 likes

Pedal Like Froome shurely?  3

Avatar
SteppenHerring | 10 years ago
0 likes

Where's the headline "Car friendly improvements forecast to terrify cyclists"? Saying that, mixing peds and cyclists is never a good idea. If the bridge is a bit narrow then take primary and PLF until you're through.

Avatar
chokofingrz replied to SteppenHerring | 10 years ago
0 likes
SteppenHerring wrote:

If the bridge is a bit narrow then take primary and PLF until you're through.

Press Legs Firmly?
Pray Like F*ck?
Practise Le French?

Avatar
SteppenHerring replied to chokofingrz | 10 years ago
0 likes
chokofingrz wrote:
SteppenHerring wrote:

If the bridge is a bit narrow then take primary and PLF until you're through.

Press Legs Firmly?
Pray Like F*ck?
Practise Le French?

Press Legs Firmly will do as my new polite translation.

Avatar
Accessibility f... replied to SteppenHerring | 10 years ago
0 likes
SteppenHerring wrote:

Where's the headline "Car friendly improvements forecast to terrify cyclists"? Saying that, mixing peds and cyclists is never a good idea. If the bridge is a bit narrow then take primary and PLF until you're through.

Would you send single-digit-aged children through there?

Avatar
fluffy_mike replied to SteppenHerring | 10 years ago
0 likes

"if the bridge is narrow just take primary and PLF until you're through"

yup, that's why 99% of people in the UK won't cycle on our roads

Avatar
PzychotropicMac | 10 years ago
0 likes

I work 500m away from here.. this is a staggeringly poor idea. Mr Ferguson truly is an unmatched idiot.

Avatar
freespirit1 | 10 years ago
0 likes

Just goes to prove some people will never be happy!!

Avatar
mrmo | 10 years ago
0 likes

do we really want to be mixing walkers and cyclists?

Avatar
JonSP | 10 years ago
0 likes

We are never going to make progress if we don't accept that some changes will annoy drivers – or should I say some drivers?

Latest Comments