Kent Police has been ordered to review its investigation into the 2011 death of a cyclist after an internal report revealed a series of inadequacies, but concluded that the investigation had been carried out correctly overall.
Following a complaint from the family of Richard Jordan, the Independent Police Complaints Commission has told the Kent force it must review their concerns.
Richard Jordan died after coming off his bike and fracturing his skull on November 24, 2011 near his home in Old Wives Lees, Kent. He was taken to hospital but died later the same day.
Kent police were not notified until 30 hours after the crash and decided before visiting the scene or interviewing any witnesses that no other vehicle had been involved.
That assessment was wrong, the force admits. Four days later, police took a statement from a driver who had made an emergency call from the scene of Mr Jordan's crash. In that call a couple could be heard arguing about whether their car had hit him.
According to the Daily Mail http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2583277/Widows-fury-police-said-..., other errors detailed in the report include:
Forensic evidence was lost when a bag containing Mr Jordan's clothes was left open.
Officers seized Mr Jordan's bicycle but not the car whose occupants dialled 999, which had a dent on the front.
The officer who made this decision was not a fully qualified forensic collision investigator at the time.
The car was declared a write-off six months after the bike crash, and police only found out because Mr Jordan's family checked its status online.
An inquest found that his death was an accident, but Mr Jordan's widow Sue, 66 and his children Neil, 46, Emma, 43, and Paul, 40, have persistently criticised the police enquiry.
Sue Jordan said: "We feel angry and helpless and I will not stop until we get some form of justice.
"Every day I relive that day and I just can't get it out of my head. Because we have no answers and we can't piece together what happened. I can't let it go. It's taken over my life."
Her son Neil said: "The police just haven't listened to us. In my mind all the facts point to him being hit. They completely failed to do some basic policing and it makes you wonder what else could have not been picked up."
Kent Police's internal report concluded that the investigation had generally been carried out properly. A Kent police spokesman told the Mail: "The review's conclusion was that the investigation was carried out correctly. However, Kent Police notes that there are administrative areas which can be learned from and added to procedures in our best practice guide."
Now the Independent Police Complaints Commission has ordered Kent police to review their investigation, according to ITV News. The IPCC says the police must explain why they did not seize the car from which the 999 call was made, why they examined a vehicle just once, by torchlight, and whether the unqualified investigating officer was properly supervised.
The Cyclists' Defence Fund has been assisting the Jordan family. After being contacted by the family, CDF wrote to all police and ambulance services urging them to ensure future cycling collisions were reported immediately to the police. Kent's ambulance service has modified its procedures.
Rhia Weston of the CDF told road.cc: "Kent police's investigation of Richard Jordan's death was bungled from the start because they weren't called out to attend the crash scene by the ambulance service and only attended 30 hours later.
"Kent police made several other blunders and the Jordan family have been fighting tenaciously for the truth to come out about how Richard died and how Kent police messed up their investigation. I'm really glad that the IPCC has upheld the family's complaint and hope that those responsible for bungling the investigation are held to account."
"All collisions that end in injury or death should be investigated to a high standard and CTC is calling for this as part of our Road Justice campaign, but this can only be achieved if officers are fully trained in collision investigation and if roads policing is properly resourced."
Add new comment
12 comments
before criticising the police people should remember that they have more important things to do at accident scenes than helping the victims and investigating the cause; taking photos of themselves to post on twitter for example
http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/11438811.Police_officer_apologises...
We do try our best but sometimes mistakes are made and in instances like this it is obvious that a correct job was not done and those responsible should be held to account.
No doubt there will be the usual responce but to criticise every officer of every force is wrong.
From CTC Road Justice document. Kent police seem to use it as a training manual:-
Careful and thorough investigation by the police is the critical first step towards a fair response from the justice system to road crashes. High quality evidence, clearly presented, is vital if robust decisions are to be made on the handling of suspected driving offences, both by prosecutors and the courts. Common problems with investigations include:
• Failure to attend the crash scene;
• Assuming that an injured cyclist is likely to be at fault, based on prejudiced views of cyclists’ behaviour;
• Failure to take statements or witness contact details at the crash scene;
• Not following up victim (s), suspect (s) and witnesses for statements for several weeks, or neglecting them altogether;
• Failure to test the driver’s eyesight or for possible mobile phone use;
• Failure to gather CCTV footage;
• Failure to keep victims informed of case progress and of key decisions relating to their case, including court dates.
To be fair, we should not tarnish all forces with the same brush. We've had many road closures (70mph dual carriageways included) for hours on end driving motorists potty and mad with [road] rage while the local Bill investigate fatal accidents or serious injury to what looks like a very high standard.
If you want to lay blame somewhere direct it to the government as they are wholly and totally responsible for cutting Police budgets to a point where forces are on the verge of breaking apart because they dont have the resources, skill and expertise that existed over 5 years ago. They've just kept chipping and chipping away and there is not much left.
Come the next two years some crime won't even be investigated. You'll report it and a civilian employee at the other end will go through a ticky-box check list and then say, "Sorry maam/sir we'll record a crime but won't investigate it. have a nice day". We are in for a rough ride until the fucking government starts investing more heavily in the Police again.
It doesn't bode well, no matter what measures are put in place by Police forces, if the resources, skills and expertise isn't there or isn't available someone is going to get a bum deal. This guy was massively wronged and although I have no proof I'd go along with the family perception that the cyclist was knocked down. That makes it a death by careless/dangerous. But we'll never know I guess. What a bunch of Kents they are.
@ Critchio
Is sounds like you want endless spending increases, something I object to. I thoroughly disagree with the attitude that the police being incompetent is merely due to lack of funds and that we would have a great police force by simply pumping more and more cash in all of the time.
Being against crime does not mean having to support a massive police force. Prevention comes 1st, dealing with the failure to prevent crime comes 2nd.
If crime has trended down for 10-15 years to half of what it was then why shouldn't we cut police and police budgets to match?
Has crime massively come down ? You trust statistics ? Have people suddenly become better citizens ? Seems unlikely.
Even if they had - you'd still need people to handle incidents like this.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-27067615
Did I say we should get rid of all police!!
You don't trust statistics? That doesn't leave you with much. The crime statistics are measured in at least a couple of different ways, one of those ways doesn't involve the police, instead they survey thousands of people every year.
Were they also lying for several decades when they said crime was rising?
Hmm, with a 5th of crime not being recorded, that's quite a stretch:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27226110
Police Scotland are currently investigating a collision involving a bike and have caused a 71 mile detour in the process as they've closed the road, so they do try sometimes.
You would think it was just South Yorks who are incompetent but it seems all UK forces are. Coppers are more like social workers these days, the only things they seem to police are money makers and murders.
Just very shoddy work indeed, did half a job very badly and drew full pay.
Why can't anything ever be done about this sort of thing?