Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

TECH NEWS

Bike industry sets up saddle committee to work with UCI

Could this be the first step towards new saddle regulations for competition use?

Bicycle industry saddle experts have come together at the request of the UCI, cycle sport’s world governing body, to provide scientific information about saddle development from a performance and medical perspective.

Whether this will result in a redrawing of the rules on saddles or is a step towards a UCI saddle approval programme, it’s too early to say for sure. However, the World Federation of Sporting Goods Industry (WFSGI) – the body which set up the Bicycle Saddle Committee at the UCI’s request – believes it will eventually lead to a renewal of regulations relating to saddles for competition use.

The Bicycle Saddle Committee comprises seven companies that are involved in the manufacturing of saddles.

The Chairman of the committee is Dave Schindler, Technical Commander (yes, Commander) of ISM Saddles, while the Vice-Chairman is Piet van der Velde from Selle Italia, who has been involved with launching and re-launching various successful brands in the market.

“The WFSGI is therefore well armed to start its work in collaboration with the UCI in order to renew the regulations for bicycle saddles,” says the WFSGI.

The UCI has recently looked to be more in favour of allowing technological innovation. Its Equipment Commission, set up to review the regulations currently in place, includes representation from pro teams as well as the WFSGI. Don’t hold your breath for imminent changes to the rules, though. These things invariably take a lot of time.

The UCI began clamping down on tilted saddles back in 2011-12. The maximum amount of slope the UCI will allow is 3° from horizontal.

The other key regulation relating to saddles states: “The peak [by which they mean the tip of the nose] of the saddle shall be a minimum of 5 cm to the rear of a vertical plane passing through the bottom bracket spindle… The peak of the saddle can be moved forward until the vertical line passing through the bottom bracket spindle where that is necessary for morphological reasons.”

Graeme Obree famously sawed the nose off one saddle in an attempt to comply with UCI regulations back in the 1990s.

When the UCI introduced its approval protocol for frames and forks at the start of 2011, it said that the process would eventually be extended to include wheels, handlebars, saddles and clothing. Saddles do not yet require approval although they must, of course, comply with UCI technical regulations including one that states they must measure 24-30cm in length.

Mat has been in cycling media since 1996, on titles including BikeRadar, Total Bike, Total Mountain Bike, What Mountain Bike and Mountain Biking UK, and he has been editor of 220 Triathlon and Cycling Plus. Mat has been road.cc technical editor for over a decade, testing bikes, fettling the latest kit, and trying out the most up-to-the-minute clothing. He has won his category in Ironman UK 70.3 and finished on the podium in both marathons he has run. Mat is a Cambridge graduate who did a post-grad in magazine journalism, and he is a winner of the Cycling Media Award for Specialist Online Writer. Now over 50, he's riding road and gravel bikes most days for fun and fitness rather than training for competitions.

Add new comment

8 comments

Avatar
nortonpdj | 10 years ago
0 likes

Quote from the article:
"The UCI has recently looked to be more in favour of allowing technological innovation."
Looked to be more in favour my ar5e....they haven't actually done anything, have they?

Avatar
bashthebox | 10 years ago
0 likes

The big brands love this sort of shit. As has been mentioned, smaller companies can't compete with the constant merry-go-round of innovation and promotion, whereas the big companies are built around using UCI events as shop windows.
Happily, cyclists themselves are a little more switched on and will seek out ever more obscure frames and parts to make their steed unique.

Avatar
noether | 10 years ago
0 likes

Justification therapy? No committee, no cash. And industry is flocking to mitigate disaster. The consumer pays anyhow.

Avatar
therevokid | 10 years ago
0 likes

lick road clean, 36 hours a day downt pit ... 15 mile walk home ... i were
right about that saddle though  1

Avatar
Zermattjohn | 10 years ago
0 likes

The Bicycle Saddle Committee....sounds like something the Monty Python lads would have come up with.

Avatar
Beatnik69 replied to Zermattjohn | 10 years ago
0 likes
Zermattjohn wrote:

The Bicycle Saddle Committee....sounds like something the Monty Python lads would have come up with.

Cyclists today don't know how easy they 'ave it with their modern fancy-dan saddles. Saddles! When I were a lad we had to sit on a rusty spike.  4

Avatar
CygnusX1 replied to Beatnik69 | 10 years ago
0 likes

Rusty spike? Bloody luxury! When ah were a lad...

Avatar
notfastenough | 10 years ago
0 likes

I get that all kit should be up to the rigours of the sport, but are these approval commitees really necessary? The cost of type approval is just prohibitve to the small companies. Why does the saddle need to be 24-30cm in length? Who cares if it's a bit more set forward, thus breaching the 5cm rule?

(Not rhetorical questions - answers appreciated!)

Latest Comments