Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Add new comment
54 comments
I think I will wear blinkers and fire a gun in random directions. Not my fault if I hit someone. Right?
We know the inherent issues with blind spots. We know the lack of public awareness of the safety issues of cycling in traffic, how cycle lanes guide the unwary trusting cyclist down the left hand side of vehicles at traffic lights. Remember these are not cyclists who look up safety issues etc. They assume that the road structure, if it has cycle lanes on it, is there to keep them safe. And why shouldn't they assume this?
Not a worthwhile exercise arguing who is at fault, but it is worthwhile arguing how to prevent it from happening again. And again. And again.
Being reported elsewhere that the cyclist was an experienced commuter, an active member of London Dynamo Cycle Club and raced at Hillingdon on Saturday:
http://www.hackneyhive.co.uk/index/2015/02/dalston-man-named-cyclist-kil...
Practically the complete opposite of a noob that would be oblivious about going up the inside of a HGV.
Frankly, if it could happen to him, it could happen to anyone.
Tragic. Just yesterday at the top of Borough High Street, I deliberately stayed back on my cycle in the northbound left hand lane to see whether the tipper truck to my right would come over into the left hand lane, as I expected he would, to head over London Bridge. Sure enough he pulls over without even bothering to indicate. I am pretty sure if I had carried on in my lane he would not have seen me. About three months back I witnessed hoards of cyclists surrounding a stationary tipper truck trying to edge forward in the traffic in the middle lane on the north side of London Bridge. He realized he couldn’t see properly and sounded his horn to warn cyclists to keep clear, which seemed like the right thing to do. Many cyclists do not seem to realize the danger from these vehicles with their limited visibility. It’s not only left turns that kill. Getting dragged under the wheels when next to the truck also causes deaths. In the short term I think the government does not do nearly enough to educate cyclists to keep out of danger situations for example not sitting in the gutter in stationary traffic. Also to react to danger situations if you find yourself in one through no fault of your own. These trucks and their human drivers have to be regarded at all times as unpredictable killers and treated accordingly. As for changing truck driver behaviour how to do that? Maybe mandatory cameras in the cab pointing at the road and the truck driver should be mandatory would help. In the longer term these vehicles should be re-designed like many refuse lorries have, with the cab much lower. That would reduce pedestrian deaths too. Once again what a tragic waste of a life.
All lorries, as far as I'm aware, have an audible siren that activates when reversing. Having them fitted to activate with the left indicator as well would also alert anyone caught up the inside of a turning vehicle that they are in harms way. Granted, this could me annoying most of the time, but if it helps prevent these sad stories cropping every week then surely it's worth it. That's assuming the vehicle bothers indicating of course, which seems to be "optional" around where I live.
Tipper trucks also seem to be the major culprit, so surely something should be done urgently to address this situation. I'm saddened that nothing seems to be happening in this regard. Boris Johnson, get the finger oot ffs!!!
How fucking tragic.
RIP
There is an issue with Tipper Trucks. I've never driven one so I don't know what that is. As a former professional driver I always default to driver error. If your vehicle has blind spots you should know what they are and take them into account.
For my part the Tipper Truck phenomena has been such a constant feature that I do everything I can not to go anywhere near them. I'm certainly not going up the inside of one.
I've driven a tipper truck (not on-road as I don't have an HGV licence) and I'm highly aware of the poor visibility from the cab. It is all too easy to make a mistake. Sadly, this can result in death and serious injury.
We still don't know exactly what did happen in this incident.
How can it ever be called a mistake to drive a vehicle into a space which isn't viewable, on purpose?
If you can't see, you don't move it, simple.
Any other interpretation of the law of liability or the HC means we've accepted that road fatalities are inevitable and will happen. No big deal... just expect it, get out of the way, because might makes right.
No, you've misinterpreted what I said. You've also suggested the tipper truck driver did this on purpose, which we don't know and which the police seem to think was not the case, otherwise the driver would have been arrested on the spot. Yes, tipper trucks do present a hazard and there are safety issues involved in their use but that doesn't mean you can throw out accusations at people without knowing all the facts, unless you really want to risk a libel case.
Not just directed at you, but anyone looking at it in the view that it's hard to see out of the cab, so... it's ok to move without seeing.
Yes, if the driver moves his vehicle into a space where he can't see it to be clear, it's intentional. Else, the driver isn't in control, which is dangerous driving by default rather than the careless driving the intentional move is.
Yes, he purposefully drove the vehicle without knowing the space his vehicle was to occupy was clear of other roadusers.
Why is this so hard for so many to understand?
Rule 126: Drive at a speed where you can stop within distance that can be seen to be clear (translation: If you can't see, stop the f-ing vehicle)
Rule 159:
Before moving off you should:
- use all mirrors to check the road is clear
- look round to check the blind spots (the areas you are unable to see in the mirrors)
- signal if necessary before moving out
- look round for a final check.
Move off only when it is safe to do so.
What's so difficult about this?
Ah, Hackney - the "share the road - it's safer" borough. Thanks again...
Homerton High Street is less than nine metres wide where Akis was killed, and narrows to seven metres in places.
If teaboy has a proposal for how to provide high quality protected space on this rather narrow street, and at this minor junction in particular, he should put it forward.
Deleted
For some reason the Evening Standard reported earlier that the driver had been arrested, before removing the revised story. Apologies for relaying what appears to have been a false report.
What a ridiculously presumptuous thing to say.
Anymore ridiculous than talking about Madrid lorry drivers? Me' thinks not.
If you think that an illustration of driver awareness in a heavily congested city as an example of how people live together and how this particular truck driver should have been aware of cyclists is more ridiculous than assuming you know which roads I do or don't know and the resulting right to comment, then that's up to you.
You don't know that road. Cyclists regular come up on vehicles from the left and so drop into a massive blind spot. The driver will likely have been focusing on the car in front and the traffic in front of that. Undertaking is never recommended but this is how the road set-up dictates things. Strictly speaking the cyclist should take the lane and sit behind the truck - never undertake a tipper.
It's not surprising that a tipper truck was involved as they have huge off-side blind spots. The driver will not have known that the cyclist was there and may have done nothing wrong.
The filtering of cyclists happens well before any junction or traffic light.
Please heed your own advice & keep your victim blaming opinions to yourself.
Well I have seen a lot of cyclists do this and it is dangerous to do so here. I'm explaining that it is about the road structure forcing cyclists into a behaviour they have learned. And explaining that the lorry driver may have been obeying the rules of the road too. People are pretty quick to jump on lorry driver (as evidenced above). You haven't told them to be quiet so I won't be anytime soon.
Which may or may not have any relevance to this incident. You weren't there, you don't know, speculation doesn't help anyone.
You weren't there, you don't know, speculation doesn't help anyone.
It is understandable that people will empathise with the dead cyclist & blame the driver of the vehicle that killed them but of the 20 odd comments prior to your comment blaming the victim & imaging what the driver was thinking about, 1 person mentioned the driver & said that their attitude would be a contributing factor.
The driver has a responsibility to be aware of the fact that a cyclist may be there. If he was not aware then he has done something wrong.
I would agree with you if the lorry is turning and moving into space. But if it just moving forward then you cannot hope for it to be aware 100% of the time of what happens behind or beside it.
That tells us that these things are inherently unsafe and shouldn't be on the road
Careful about the logic. People talk about cyclists in the same way....
Only daft people. We probably shouldn't be listening to daft people.
Driver attitude will have a massive part to play in this.
I lived and drove, cycled and motorcycled in Madrid and not once had issue with drivers. That is except for one bus driver who was looking for trouble and deliberately drove at me while cycling.
As a driver you have to expect the motorbikes and scooters filter through to the front a traffic lights. Even if none filter through, you expect it and therefore look for it. There is a far heightened awareness of other road users. The only accidents I saw were where the scooterist had gambled and lost.
There are lots of cyclists in that there London village and the driver's default should be that there is a cyclist coming from behind.
We must learn to share the roads.
I know this road and from the picture exactly where this is. It's quite a narrow stretch and there is some road furniture which puts the cyclists in direct conflict with the traffic.
Usually the traffic is slow just before Chatsworth Road, often cyclists coming up from the junction get the hop on the traffic because of queues. The tendency is for them to under cut the traffic. As the approach the traffic island the inside route is normally barred because the cars/buses/trucks take away the space. I would not recommend doing this, and that cyclists overtake the slow moving traffic here.
I have seen many less wary about doing so.
The road infrastructure will have a massive part to play in this.
RIP,
I regularly have a number of tipper trucks pass me on the way to work, and i have never had an issue the drivers give me plenty of room. However this is in a rural setting plenty of time good sight lines etc. now take one of these trucks and place it into a urban setting, far more to see, far more going on, driver distracted by sat nav trying to find delivery address, cars and cyclists cutting in and out, then through in to the mix the trucks own issues with blind spots and you really do have a disaster waiting to happen.
In the right place these trucks are perfectly safe, an urban setting isn't the right place without major work.
I seem to remember that a large quantity of materials for the olympics were brought in on barges to keep trucks off the road. This won't work for everything but it is things like this that should be addressed on all developments.
I'm afraid that was greenwash. Barges were hardly used at all. It was a scam to barrage the tidal river Lea so that there'd be no low-tide mud by the riverside housing they wanted to sell. You used to see the tides at Hackney marsh - not any more.
http://www.gamesmonitor.org.uk/node/771
http://www.gamesmonitor.org.uk/node/401
Might have been greenwash, but it does point out that if they could be arsed there are things that could be done, infact it does actually make an important point, if they could be arsed to spend the money they could get trucks off the road. How much is a life worth?
Pages