Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Consultation opens on TfL’s “A10 bypass” Cycle Superhighway

Route will mainly run on quiet back roads alongside major highway - and on pavement alonsgide it

Consultation opens on TfL’s “A10 bypass” Cycle Superhighway

Transport for London (TfL) has opened a consultation on a Cycle Superhighway (CS) billed as an “A10 bypass” for people on bikes, with claims that cyclists will save more than a quarter of the journey time for travelling along its entire length compared to riding on the main road.

Running from Tottenham to the City of London via Hackney and Dalston, the route mainly follows quiet backstreets parallel to the A10.

Where it does run alongside the main road, the cycle path is off-carriageway and – something that has grabbed a lot of attention – has trees running down the middle of it, presumably to encourage a two-way flow of riders.

CS1 off-road cycle path on Tottenham High Road

Mayor of London Boris Johnson said: “Our research shows that well over 100,000 journeys in this area could be made by bike instead.

“This Cycle Superhighway will provide cyclists with a direct, protected route along quiet streets, making it even easier for people to hop on a bike rather than getting in their cars.

“This is exactly what the cycling revolution is all about – making it simpler and safer for ordinary people to choose to get on the saddle and enjoy London by bike.”

On the day that TfL’s board approved the plans, as well as those for the East-West and North-South Cycle Superhighways crossing the city centre, Green Party Assembly Member Jenny Jones expressed reservations at such a route heading along back roads, and said provision should be made for cyclists on major roads too.

She said: “The Hackney scheme is a great Quietway, but it is not a superhighway. Giving cyclists the choice of a good route along residential roads is welcome, but the Mayor also needs to fix the main roads and junctions which he controls on the parallel route.

“Many cyclists will enjoy a quieter, less polluted route, but many others want the directness and speed of the main roads. With the deaths of two cyclists on Hackney main roads, so far this year, we have to make both choices safer.”

However, in today’s announcement of the consultation, London’s cycling commissioner, Andrew Gilligan, insisted: “As we made clear in the Mayor’s Vision for Cycling, superhighways need not be on main roads where better, more direct alternatives exist.

“Some of the most successful stretches of the current network, such as Cable Street and Narrow Street on CS3, are on side streets.

“This route will be quicker to deliver, more pleasant to use and more convenient for cyclists than anything we could do on the main road – including full segregation.”

In the consultation, TfL claims that journey times would be significantly reduced and also points out what it sees as other benefits of the plans, saying:

The new route would provide safer and faster cycling journeys than using the parallel A10. Our research shows cyclists could ride from Tottenham to the City in around 30 minutes, compared with over 40 minutes for a similar journey along the A10. Cyclists on CS1 would pass through just eight traffic signals, compared with 54 traffic signals for the equivalent journey along the A10. We are confident CS1 would allow faster and more reliable cycling journey times.

The changes proposed would also provide significant benefits for pedestrians, with more and safer crossings, traffic calming, and urban realm improvements.

We welcome suggestions for alternative route alignments through Haringey. We continue to investigate alignment options including the extension of the two-way cycle track further south along Tottenham High Road.

Among the chief features of the proposals as they stand are:

Major enhancements to the busy ‘Apex Junction’ (Great Eastern Street and Old Street) to allow cyclists to cross more safely

Road closures to reduce traffic on some streets (eg Pitfield Street) where it is not quiet enough

New segregated tracks on short stretches where the route has to use a busy road

New segregated tracks to link the scheme to the Old Street roundabout

Safer crossings for pedestrians

Improved public spaces along the route, including 1000 square metres of new footway and 60 new trees.

CS1 Apex Junction where Old St meets Great Eastern St

Full details of individual sections of the route, which also links to the communities TfL says stand to benefit most from it, can be found on TfL’s consultation hub, with replies invited by 29 March 2015.

TfL says that subject to the results of the consultation, work could start on CS1 during the summer with the route open early in 2016.

Leon Daniels, TfL’s managing director of surface transport, said: “Cycling in London has more than doubled in the last decade.

“However, many existing and potential cyclists are not aware of direct cycle routes along quieter streets, such as the route that CS1 would follow.

“These plans will provide a clear and safe cycling route into central London, as well as see the major transformation of the ‘Apex Junction’.

“We look forward to hearing from Londoners about these designs and, subject to the comments receive, will look to deliver these improvements as quickly as we can to help more people take to two wheels.”

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

15 comments

Avatar
BrendaP | 9 years ago
0 likes

A two way cycle lane on the residential side of the street? What if cyclists want to stop at a shop on the other side of the street - where it looks like all the shops are? If I decide I want to cycle on the left of the road (as I most likely would to give me options to turn off or stop on my side of the road) they have made the lanes so narrow because they are now only for cars, I would not have room to pass or be passed.

And they have three motor traffic lanes going each way!

Am I the only person who does not like two way cycle lanes on one side of a busy two-fronted road?

Avatar
fukawitribe replied to BrendaP | 9 years ago
0 likes

This comment retracted as some of the attitudes makes me not want to bother debating it....

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to BrendaP | 9 years ago
0 likes
BrendaP wrote:

A two way cycle lane on the residential side of the street? What if cyclists want to stop at a shop on the other side of the street - where it looks like all the shops are? If I decide I want to cycle on the left of the road (as I most likely would to give me options to turn off or stop on my side of the road) they have made the lanes so narrow because they are now only for cars, I would not have room to pass or be passed.

And they have three motor traffic lanes going each way!

Am I the only person who does not like two way cycle lanes on one side of a busy two-fronted road?

Plenty of room to be passed, in the other two lanes.

Avatar
atgni replied to BrendaP | 9 years ago
0 likes
BrendaP wrote:

A two way cycle lane on the residential side of the street? What if cyclists want to stop at a shop on the other side of the street - where it looks like all the shops are?

I suspect you could cross the road if you wanted to stop at a shop. As do pedestrians or bus passengers. It's better than the cars; the car drivers can't stop at the shops.

For me, priority at side roads is a bigger issue. I'd probably end up on the road anyway as I wouldn't want to keep stopping to wait to cross every single side road.

Avatar
severs1966 | 9 years ago
0 likes

At least the designers now understand that the bikes should routinely go "round the back" of the bus stops.

Putting trees in the middle of a cycle path is just idiotic, but is presumably the flight of fancy of some designer who imagines they will stop people driving cars down the path, like bollards, having read one of the many publications that suggests that over-use of bollards is a bad thing.

Is it really so hard for designers to look at a few photos of Utrecht or Gronigen or Den Haag?

Avatar
fukawitribe | 9 years ago
0 likes

I hope the folk with knowledge of the area who are commenting on here will also take part in the consultation.

Avatar
FatTyres | 9 years ago
0 likes

Has anyone found or can anyone point me in the direction of a complete map of the proposed route?

The only maps I can immediately see on the consultation website are broken up into segments and not orientated either consistently or to north. It would be helpful to be able to see the entire thing.

Avatar
pmanc replied to FatTyres | 9 years ago
0 likes
FatTyres wrote:

Has anyone found or can anyone point me in the direction of a complete map of the proposed route?

If it's of use I was after the same thing as you so I drew the route on a google map (along with the north-south and east-west superhighways). You can see the results here.

Disclaimers:
1) No guarantees I've got all this right - by all means let me know if I messed up.
2) It's just a line along a route and gives no indication of which side of the road or any of the detail.

I do think it's a shame those responsible (TfL in this case) never present routes in a handy accessible zoom-able format like this so we can see the context. Even better would be more detailed overlays like this. But I can't be bothered to do that for the whole route. Maybe some nice cycling news source (road.cc) could provide easily navigable maps like this?

Avatar
Dan-Himself | 9 years ago
0 likes

That bus stop in the first picture is ridiculously busy in the evening, I can imagine people crowding all over that cycle lane.
You can always use the Hertford Union canal which almost runs parallel to the a10 anyway, and is much prettier/quieter.

Avatar
Al__S | 9 years ago
0 likes

On the Tottenham High Road plan, why have they kept the bus lane so wide? Surely that could be narrowed to provide a bit more space for the cycleway or to put the trees in a separate strip (engineered to minimise root problems)? Is the wide bus lane just so that Vincent Stops & co can continue to ride with the buses?

Avatar
Metaphor | 9 years ago
0 likes

Certainly looks good!

Avatar
ConcordeCX | 9 years ago
0 likes

I like the way the artist's impression is so realistic.

It would be terrible if they'd tried to picture that road as heaving with motor traffic, or with thousands of rush-hour pedestrians rushing around in all directions, all over the cycle-paths, blocking the cyclists so they end up going even slower than the people on foot, because that never happens, does it?

Avatar
fukawitribe replied to ConcordeCX | 9 years ago
0 likes
ConcordeCX wrote:

I like the way the artist's impression is so realistic.

Oh for the love of Whoever - not this again....

Avatar
badbobb | 9 years ago
0 likes

i love cycling on the road with all the pot holes..... even better in the car .... i really do

Avatar
Al__S | 9 years ago
0 likes

I love riding on cycleways where tree roots are pushing up the tarmac every few metres. Absolutely love it.

No, wait, not love. The other one..

Latest Comments