Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Car breakdown company to drivers: don't assume if one cyclist does something stupid that they all do

GEM Motoring assist urges drivers to give riders room and not rebuke cyclists whose riding offends them

A car breakdown and insurance company has warned its customers against "rebuking" a cyclist "whose riding behaviour offends you" and not to assume that if one cyclist does something dangerous that they all do it.

Car breakdown and insurance company, GEM Motoring Assist, has joined the likes of the AA in offering sensible advice to its motoring customers in the light of an 8% rise in serious injuries to cyclists, which, it says, can be higher in summer as more people get out on their bikes.

In an article on its website, the company's chief executive tells drivers "to accept we're all on the roads to get somewhere safely", and points out "failing to look properly" is one of the main causes of crashes. The article also points out cyclists are entitled to the full lane of the road, not just the "extreme left part", and advises drivers to give cyclists as much room when overtaking as they would a car.

GEM chief executive, David Williams MBE, says: “We believe there are two really important actions drivers can take immediately to reduce the risk to themselves and to cyclists. First, to accept that we’re all on the road with the intention of trying to arrive somewhere safely. Second, to be more observant on journeys, because ‘failing to look properly’ is the most common contributory factor recorded by police in a collision involving a bicycle and another vehicle."

GEM's five tips for drivers are:

• Remember above all that everyone on the road is trying to get somewhere safely. Do everything you can to play your part and you’ll be contributing to a safer road environment.

• Good observation is key, especially at junctions. This, combined with patience, helps ensure safer journeys for drivers and riders. As drivers, we should try to defuse tension, not increase it.

• Don’t stress when a cyclist performs a risky or illegal manoeuvre, and certainly don’t make any attempt to rebuke someone whose riding behaviour offends you. And don’t assume that if one cyclist does something dangerous, then all cyclists do it.

• Cyclists are entitled to the full lane of a road, not just the extreme left part. They need to manoeuvre round hazards such as potholes or drains, so be sure to anticipate this and give the space they need to stay safe.

• Give cyclists plenty of space when you pass – ideally as much space as you would give when overtaking another car. Avoid squeezing past or starting an overtaking manoeuvre when you can’t see far enough ahead to know you can complete it safely.

Although driver education in isolation has limited effect on behaviour in the real world, it's worth recognising the companies that serve drivers which are increasingly on-side with people on bikes, while condemning 'punishment', and negative generalisation which can be played out in risky, aggressive behaviour.

The AA's Edmund King has been on the front line of promoting cyclist-motorist harmony from the motorists' side, even expounding the benefits of the bicycle over the car in cities, and has gone so far as to call cyclist-hating drivers "idiots".

Green Flag advises drivers to give plenty of room when passing cyclists, ideally crossing to the other side of the road. It says "hold back, be patient and wait until it is clear to pass with a wide berth."

The relevant section of the RAC's website offers as much, if not more, advice for cyclists as it does for drivers, however, and includes the government's Think! campaign advice, including giving a cyclist at least half a car's width when passing. It also says "cyclists should ensure they are visible to motorists and other road users at all times by wearing bright-coloured clothing," along with advice to wear cycle helmets.

Laura Laker is a freelance journalist with more than a decade’s experience covering cycling, walking and wheeling (and other means of transport). Beginning her career with road.cc, Laura has also written for national and specialist titles of all stripes. One part of the popular Streets Ahead podcast, she sometimes appears as a talking head on TV and radio, and in real life at conferences and festivals. She is also the author of Potholes and Pavements: a Bumpy Ride on Britain’s National Cycle Network.

Add new comment

12 comments

Avatar
burtthebike | 9 years ago
0 likes

While the comments from the car hire company won't change things overnight, it is a welcome sign that things are changing. Could you have imagined this happening ten years ago?

We're getting there, but this situation makes the proverbial oil tanker changing direction look instant. Like the change in smoking habits, changing the attitude of the majority about cyclists will take a generation, and even then, the Clarkson tendency will live on in a few.

Avatar
Username | 9 years ago
0 likes

It's not Dutch-designed infrastructure but it's a small and welcome step.

Driver ignorance is astounding: Road Tax, two abreast, RLJ, 'overtaking' on the inside, yada, yada.

It looks like the DVLA is doing nothing to tackle this ignorance, the police do precious little, at least this is something.

Avatar
TheSpaniard replied to Username | 9 years ago
0 likes
Username wrote:

It's not Dutch-designed infrastructure but it's a small and welcome step.

Admittedly I don't live or ride in a big city, but personally I don't particularly want Dutch-style segregated infrastructure. I'd prefer to just be able to ride on existing infrastructure without some fucktard driving into me.

Getting the dangerous/irresponsible drivers (and cyclists as well) off the roads must surely be a cheaper, safer and more sustainable alternative, no?

Avatar
mrmo replied to TheSpaniard | 9 years ago
0 likes
TheSpaniard wrote:
Username wrote:

It's not Dutch-designed infrastructure but it's a small and welcome step.

Admittedly I don't live or ride in a big city, but personally I don't particularly want Dutch-style segregated infrastructure. I'd prefer to just be able to ride on existing infrastructure without some fucktard driving into me.

Getting the dangerous/irresponsible drivers (and cyclists as well) off the roads must surely be a cheaper, safer and more sustainable alternative, no?

I don't want segregated infrastructure particularly, it can never duplicate the existing network. I do however believe that we need people on bikes, we need people to not think cyclist, but to think that is my wife, daughter, son etc. Drivers must see a person on a bike and not a cyclist. How do we achieve more cyclists? To be honest i believe that you need more safe routes, and that segregated infrastructure is more likely to work than policing.

Avatar
Username replied to TheSpaniard | 9 years ago
0 likes
TheSpaniard wrote:

Admittedly I don't live or ride in a big city, but personally I don't particularly want Dutch-style segregated infrastructure. I'd prefer to just be able to ride on existing infrastructure without some fucktard driving into me.

Getting the dangerous/irresponsible drivers (and cyclists as well) off the roads must surely be a cheaper, safer and more sustainable alternative, no?

No.

I used to think that way. I've been mixing it with traffic all my life and have no problem taking primary in the worst of roads; I prefer the directness of Euston Road despite the traffic than taking any twisty turny convoluted alternative, no matter how quiet.

But this view changed when I had a kid. I can't ask her to take primary in front of a HGV. Cycling is not just about a few fit blokes mixing it with the trucks. Cycling should be for all. The fit blokes will benefit too from reduced traffic, reduced pollution, and safer roads.

Decades of asking motorists to 'share the road' and please be nice has achieved fuck all. In the same time the Dutch have gone the opposite direction and look what they have achieved.

One country has it right and the other has it wrong. I'll leave it to you to work out which is which.

Avatar
brooksby replied to Username | 9 years ago
0 likes
Username wrote:

Driver ignorance is astounding: Road Tax, two abreast, RLJ, 'overtaking' on the inside, yada, yada.

It looks like the DVLA is doing nothing to tackle this ignorance, the police do precious little, at least this is something.

True. Too many also believe that learning the highway code and having a licence plate will stop all cyclists behaving badly. Because, after all, look how well it's worked out for motorists' behaviour...

Avatar
thehairs1970 | 9 years ago
0 likes

Good point from this company. Do you think cycle insurance companies will offer the same advice to cyclists? I get fed up, and sometimes ashamed to be a cyclist, when I hear and read the sweeping statements about car drivers who, some would have us believe, are attempting to kill us all.

Avatar
badbobb | 9 years ago
0 likes

even if its for "self help" its still good all round, for car users and cyclists

Avatar
marcswales | 9 years ago
0 likes

Cynical mode on
Insurance company, starts to see it's customers behaviour has financial consequences
Cynical mode off

No matter the reasoning behind the message, if the message is repeated often enough and from enough different directions, it may, eventually, sink in.

Avatar
portec | 9 years ago
0 likes

... it's worth recognising the companies that serve drivers which are increasingly on-side with people on bikes ...

I agree. I'd not heard of GEM before but now I have, and in a positive way. That has to be good for business. On the other hand "drivers" and "people on bikes" are often the same people. There are very few cyclists in Britain that don't also drive a car. The cynical side of me wonders if companies such as GEM and the AA are finally waking up to the fact that many of their customers ride bikes as well as drive cars and they should try not to p1ss off that sector of their business. Good on them for publishing this though. Now all we need to do is get it published outside the cycling media.

Avatar
Ric_Stern_RST | 9 years ago
0 likes

with regards to the RAC's website: cyclists need more than half a car's width. At least 1.5m.

Avatar
Laura Laker replied to Ric_Stern_RST | 9 years ago
0 likes

So it does, thanks for pointing out. I have now amended it to say at least half a car's width.

Latest Comments