Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Cyclists sue Metrolink after coming off their bikes on tramlines

Law firm says cycle route signage is insufficient and poorly thought-out

A Salford couple are to sue Greater Manchester’s Metrolink tram service after they came off their bikes while riding over tramlines. The solicitors representing Mike and Jane Leader say they are already representing another five clients who came off their bikes at the same point with a further eight people having come forward in the last fortnight.

The Manchester Evening News reports that Birchall Blackburn Law is calling for a safety review and more signs and road markings near the Cemetery Road Metrolink stop in Droylsden.

Mike Leader said:

“Instead of tram tracks coming down the middle of the road, they veer off into a siding and veer back out again.

“They cut at a sharp angle when they come back out and you can’t cycle over them. They come up on you very suddenly. I was bang, straight down, and then my wife did exactly the same thing. We both ended up on the road in a lot of pain.”

Mike tore a ligament in his shoulder while Jane broke her arm in two places.

A Transport for Greater (TfGM) spokesman said a cycle route is provided at the Cemetery Road stop so cyclists don’t need to cross the rails, but Jamie Patton, the solicitor representing the Leaders, said directions were unclear.

“Signage for cyclists around some tram stops is completely insufficient and poorly thought out. I’m a cyclist myself and the crossings are perilous. The routes that are meant to divert cyclists around the tram tracks are unclear and instead cyclists are missing key directions, getting their wheels stuck in the tramlines and coming off their bikes.”

The spokesman said TfGM regularly reviewed the measures in place and enhanced them where appropriate to ensure people could cycle safely alongside the tram network. “As a result, thousands of cyclists use the main roads alongside Metrolink safely every day.”

The Metrolink is currently undergoing a £1.5 billion investment project to triple in size and TfGM figures found that the number of cyclists involved in accidents with a tram had tripled between 2013 and 2014.

Tram tracks have caused issues for cyclists in many cities around the UK. In July, the Cycle Sheffield campaign group claimed that they presented the biggest danger to local cyclists with more than 120 incidents recorded in a six month period.

Meanwhile, in Edinburgh, a firm of lawyers is dealing with nearly 100 claims against the city council following tram track injuries. Thompsons Solicitors said that action must be taken to prevent what they see as an "inevitable" cycling fatality.

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

13 comments

Avatar
andyp | 8 years ago
0 likes

I'm glad that TfGM didn't make segregated cycling provision, because that would be stupid. Not as stupid as some of these tram line angles - Ashton Old Road near Snipe for instance being an absolute horror.

Avatar
ja87ybea | 9 years ago
0 likes

It is a pity that TfGM did not take the opportunity to provide proper segregated cycling provision alongside the large scale work on roads and junctions to accommodation the tram. We could have ended up with many lines of safe cycling routes for minimal additional cost. Instead, they have splashed a bit of white/green paint on the roads and put up some shared use signs. I don't think they regard cycling as a transport option - more of a lifestyle choice.

Avatar
Shouldbeinbed | 9 years ago
0 likes

The cycle lane goes bwhind the tram stop, there is barely any signage and it is invariably hidden behind a row of parked cars. The tram tracks are at the worst possible angle for cycling across, wet or dry. It is easy to sneer and pontificate without direct experience but having ridden and damn near come off myself at that point, I sincerely hope this legal action succeeds as I have absolute sympathy with those less fortunate that I was. I have witneased cyxlists down at various points on that stretch of road, I no longer ride it and I am not a nervous cyclist or shrinking violet in my riding, it is the one piece of road in the whole of 40 years riding in many busy cities, I actively avoid. TfGM have made an absolute death trap of it not only the thoughtless/imbecillic/vindictive planning after voting down the congestion charge, of the tram lines zig zagging off and on the road, but the cycle lanes directly in the door zones of parking spaces, no sort of parking control or management placing bikes, parked cars and trams in direct competition for the same piece of space. To paraphrase a famous saying: cycle a mile on our pedals before getting so high and mighty about just dealing with them.

Avatar
miles_from_anywhere | 9 years ago
0 likes

"Given this kind of move requires confidence and specific knowledge, likely to only be available to an experienced cyclist, and not the mass of riders I would have thought in the interests of safety it would be better to design decent infrastructure in the first place..."

I half agree. I have just arrived in Toronto and have been cycling the down-town area and its many tram-lined streets. It is scary at first but you just have to pay attention. The idea that I can just cycle in a straight line isn't possible, I would be off in an instant with my skinny road tyres. I have learned to plan ahead and cross all tramlines at an angle (me and 1,000 other cyclists I see everyday).

The city provides safer routes, on other non-tram roads, for any cyclist not wishing to travel on tram streets. But in general, the people of Toronto seem to pay attention and get on with it.

It helps that everyone here obeys the laws of the road, something car drivers and cyclists seem to forget all too often in the UK. Cars ALWAYS give way to pedestrians (it takes a bit of getting used to when walking around!).

Hopefully some better signage and common sense will help people cope with the small amount of tramlines in that area.

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to miles_from_anywhere | 9 years ago
0 likes
miles_from_anywhere wrote:

But in general, the people of Toronto seem to pay attention and get on with it.

I dunno, but the only data I can find says the modal share for cycling in Toronto is 2%. So would it not be more accurate to say the people of Toronto decide they'd rather use a different means of transport?

Avatar
Brooess | 9 years ago
0 likes

Seriously? It's a road with tram lines, open your eyes and get on with it.
Most cities in Europe have tram lines and I don't recall pathetic bleating about them.

You cannot legislate for common sense.

Clearly you cannot legislate for using brain before making judgemental comments online either...

The only safe way to ride over tramlines (and drainage covers and wet paint) is directly perpendicular and upright.

If you look at the photo above you'll see the tram lines cross the road at a VERY shallow angle - very easy for the wheel to drop in or tyre to lose grip. The only safe way to ride over those would be to take a perpendicular line over them which would mean making a sudden sharp turn from the left lane to the right. I can't imagine any following drivers would take too kindly to that...

Given this kind of move requires confidence and specific knowledge, likely to only be available to an experienced cyclist, and not the mass of riders I would have thought in the interests of safety it would be better to design decent infrastructure in the first place...

Avatar
antigee | 9 years ago
1 like

"......most European cities......" have trams in the centre of the road and cyclists only cross at right angles, mixing it at angles or even sharing space with trams is very different.
Used to live in Sheffield and can recall 2 nasty near miss incidents on roads where cyclists share with trams, due to the layout of the city these situations are hard to avoid. Currently in Melbourne, Aus, extensive tram network but hard pressed to think of any locations where cross tracks at low angles or mix it with trams. Wet tracks are still a problem though.

Avatar
ned68201 | 9 years ago
0 likes

Seriously? It's a road with tram lines, open your eyes and get on with it.
Most cities in Europe have tram lines and I don't recall pathetic bleating about them.

You cannot legislate for common sense.

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to ned68201 | 9 years ago
0 likes
ned68201 wrote:

Seriously? It's a road with tram lines, open your eyes and get on with it.
Most cities in Europe have tram lines and I don't recall pathetic bleating about them.

You cannot legislate for common sense.

It doesn't need legislation, just more thoughtful design. Not all tram lines are the same or equally hazardous.

You might see cycling as being primarily a means to prove your skills, but personally I just don't see its a good thing to put hazards in the way when there's no need to do so.

Besides, anything that motorists find challenging seems to get changed quickly enough (e.g. crash barriers taking up half a pavement because some drivers seem to find the whole 'stay on the road' concept a bit tricky.)

Avatar
dunnoh | 9 years ago
0 likes

This beauty is in Withenshaw. You have to jump the tracks going round corner and it then takes you back over them slightly further down. Car drivers cant work out what lane they are in and its properly dangerous. I have to go a long way round after a couple of serious slides and a few near misses. Further on there is a massive pavement that ends up going up a tram platform. Its like a lunatic designed the layout

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@53.4008037,-2.2945974,3a,90y,298.45h,57.54t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1swNqIuOjAZ3fKH4tTS-g1jg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

Avatar
Accessibility f... | 9 years ago
0 likes

Looking at the stop on Streetview it's clear the cycle "infrastructure" is completely non-existent. There are a few blue shared footway signs here and there, but no clear way of getting on the pavement. There's even a big lovely bus stop that almost completely blocks one pavement, presumably cyclists are supposed to bunnyhop the waiting pedestrians.

I hope they win. If you modify a road such that certain vehicles cannot use it without risking their lives, then you should damn well build a new road that those vehicles CAN use.

Avatar
rasalati replied to Accessibility for all | 9 years ago
0 likes
Peowpeowpeowlasers wrote:

There's even a big lovely bus stop that almost completely blocks one pavement, presumably cyclists are supposed to bunnyhop the waiting pedestrians.

It looks to me that you're supposed to go on the left of the west bound platform, and rejoin at the Jolly Carter pub, which would avoid that bus stop.

That said, there isn't much signage and what there is puts you onto a /shared/ path.. that goes immediately past shop fronts with signs out front, further narrowing an already narrow path.

Let's ignore for a second the door zone cycle lane.. couldn't they just continue the green paint through the junction and bend it in at the same angle as the tracks to join the shared path where it's actually wide enough to be adequate? (Of course, proper segregation would be preferable, but I'm not sure how that would be possible due to the station platform).

At least there's a funeral director across the street.

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@53.4797993,-2.1522149,3a,45y,253.49h,84.62t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sbZF7THDmmDDyDIZLzv7BUg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

Avatar
Paul_C | 9 years ago
0 likes

they need to fit those rubber things in the gaps

https://www.bicyclenetwork.com.au/general/for-government-and-business/2877/

Latest Comments