A former president of British Cycling has questioned the composition of the panel conducting the independent review into allegations of sexism in the organisation’s World Class Programme. Speaking to Clare McDonnell on BBC Radio 5 Live’s Breakfast Show this morning (Friday), Tony Doyle said “something’s not right there” about the review being led by three women.
In April, UK Sport and British Cycling announced that Annamarie Phelps CBE would chair the jointly commissioned independent review into British Cycling’s World Class Programme. She was joined by Marian Lauder MBE, Non-Executive Director of British Cycling, and Liz Nicholl, CEO of UK Sport to form the commissioning board.
The review, which is examining claims of discrimination and bullying, was ordered following the resignation of British Cycling’s technical director, Shane Sutton.
In May, the three named a review panel comprising former England rugby union coach, Stuart Lancaster; Olympic hockey medallist and Goldman Sachs trader, Annie Panter; sports lawyer, John Mehrzad; and the Artistic Director of Southbank Centre, Jude Kelly CBE.
The commissioning board’s role is said to be to ensure the panel is supported in its work.
The Guardian reports that after discussing the latest allegations against Team Sky and Sir Bradley Wiggins, Doyle said:
“First of all we had the whole Shane Sutton debacle, who’s the technical director. There was an independent review because he was allegedly said to have made sexist remarks. The independent review, Clare, was conducted by three women. You know … so something’s not right there.”
McDonnell responded: “OK. Well. Ummm. Other people may disagree with you on that one. If it’s independent, it’s independent, regardless of gender, but Tony Doyle, thank you for that.”
Add new comment
7 comments
Any BCF members who lived through the Tony Doyle presidency and the legal dispute when he left will know it was one of British Cycling's lowest points. I don't think anyone misses him.
I did. God help us if people start listening to Tony Doyle's opinions.
Sexist bigot. Presumably a panel of women would be ok if the "defendant" were female?
That's funny. I can't remember anyone complaining about the thousands of such panels and committees which were all male. I wonder if Mr Doyle would make such comments if there were no women on the panel?
It is three people. Three qualified people. That is all.
Sexism exists when people, like Tony Doyle, think that the gender of people will in some way affect their ability to do the job.
Well done Tony on showing that sexism is fully embedded in the organisation.
They've a very long way to go.
#everydaysexism
Nice bit of casual sexism there Tony. Thanks for that.