A US television show has claimed that UCI officials prevented French law enforcement officers from removing the rear wheels of time trial bikes used by Team Sky at the 2015 Tour de France to check them for hidden motors.
The claims were made last night in the CBS documentary programme 60 Minutes, which focused on the issue of mechanical doping within professional cycling.
As we reported ahead of the show airing yesterday, CBS had already revealed that former Tour de France champion Greg LeMond had said that he was distrustful of recent results in the race because of the possibility some riders are cheating by using hidden motors.
> Mechanical doping: “I won’t trust any victories of the Tour de France,” says Greg LeMond
Yesterday’s programme focused on the Hungarian engineer Istvan Varjas, known as Stefano, who claimed to have sold exclusive 10-year rights to his hidden motor technology to an anonymous buyer in 1998 for $2 million.
It’s the claims that hidden motors are currently being used at the highest levels of the sport, including at the Tour de France, that are most worrying, however.
LeMond and his wife Kathy met Varjas in Paris before the 2014 Tour de France, and the three-time Tour de France winner, who has ridden one of the bikes, told 60 Minutes he is convinced some riders are using them.
“I know the motor’s still in the sport,” LeMond said. “There’s always a few bad apples, and it’s a lot of money.”
The couple had raised their concerns with French investigators, and convinced Varjas to co-operate with the authorities while LeMond was working as a TV pundit on the race.
Varjas told French police that shortly before the 2015 Tour de France, he had supplied an unspecified quantity of bikes with concealed motors to a locked storage unit in Beaulieu-sur-Mer, a seaside village between Nice and Monaco.
The deal was said to have been arranged through an intermediary, and the Hungarian said he did not know who the ultimate client was.
Besides the motor he developed that are hidden inside a frame, Varjas had later designed one that sits inside the hub of a rear wheel, adding around 800 grams of weight compared to a standard version of the wheel.
CBS reporter Bill Whitaker asked the LeMonds: “You could detect it by weight?”
Greg LeMond replied: “Yeah. Cycling weight is everything. Your body, your bike. If your bike weighs a kilo more, you would never race on it.”
The 2015 Tour de France had two stages against the clock – the first on the opening day in the Dutch city of Utrecht, the second the Stage 9 team time trial from Vannes to Plumelec in Brittany.
The 60 Minutes report said that the programme had been told by French authorities that at that year’s race, they had weighed bikes before a time trial stage and that of all the teams, it was Sky’s bikes that weighed the most – fully 800 grams heavier than those of any other team tested.
A report on Stage 9 of the 2015 Tour de France in the Telegraph confirms that Team Sky’s bikes were taken afterwards to be checked for concealed motors, with the riders having to return to the team bus, parked a kilometre downhill from the finish, in the broom wagon.
The report did not say whether they had also been checked prior to the stage, which was won by BMC Racing, with Team Sky finishing 1 second behind to keep Chris Froome in the yellow jersey that he would keep all the way to Paris as he secured the second of his three overall victories in the race.
On the day in question, Team Sky’s Wout Poels had lost contact with his team mates prior to the final climb, where Nicolas Roche would also struggle as he dropped off the back.
A spokesman for Team Sky quoted on 60 Minutes insisted the team had never been involved in what the UCI terms “technological fraud” and added that the governing body had checked the bikes and found no issue with them.
He also said that “during a time-trial stage bikes might be heavier to allow for better aerodynamic performance.”
Whether that is in comparison to other teams, or to bikes used in road stages, is unclear – although when it comes to performance, when racing against the clock, weight is less of a consideration than reducing air drag.
Having said that, with an uphill finish at that team time trial stage – 1.7 kilometres at an average gradient of 6.2 per cent – it’s likely teams would have wanted to have kept the weight of their bikes as low as possible.
Team Sky rode that day on the Pinarello Bolide, and it could also be that the 2015 version of the bike was fairly ‘chunky’ in relative terms – the following year, launching an updated model ahead of the Giro d’Italia, the Italian bike brand claimed to have shaved 350g from the weight.
> Pinarello launch 2016 Bolide TT bike at the Giro d’Italia
While 60 Minutes acknowledged that the weight of a bike compared to others was not in itself proof of doping, it claimed that it had been told by sources that UCI officials would not let the French authorities remove the wheels from the Team Sky bikes to weigh them separately to try and discover whether anything was amiss.
At the time of the 2015 Tour de France, despite widespread rumours that hidden motors might be used in the peloton, none had been found in competition.
That changed 12 months ago this week, when one was discovered in a bike used by Belgian Under-23 rider Femke Van den Driessche at the UCI Cyclo-cross World Championships in Zolder, Belgium, and she would later be banned for six years and fined 20,000 Swiss Francs.
Subsequently, the UCI stepped up its efforts and carried out widespread testing using the app it had developed that, linked to a tablet computer, aims to detect electromagnetic waves.
At last year’s Tour de France, those efforts were supplemented by x-ray equipment as well as thermal imaging cameras loaned by the French military.
During the race, Team Sky principal Sir Dave Brailsford insisted his team was not using mechanical assistance and that it would be impossible for one to go undetected given the amount of controls being conducted.
“[Chris Froome’s] bike has been tested more than everyone else’s,” he said. “We get tested every day and we actually had an email from the UCI saying thank you for being the most cooperative team out of everybody when it comes to bike checks and mechanical checking.
He added: “If someone is stupid enough to come here [to the Tour de France] with a motor in their bike, for sure they will get caught.”
However, in October last year, Varjas told Irish radio show Off The Ball that he and Kathy LeMond had seen UCI officials stop French Gendarmes from carrying out checks on bikes. He did not name which teams the bikes were from.
> UCI blocked police from conducting Tour de France hidden motor tests, claims Hungarian engineer
While 60 Minutes did not say it believed Team Sky was using hidden motors, the questions the programme raises come at a difficult time for the British WorldTour outfit, as UK Anti-doping (UKAD) probes whether there was any “wrongdoing” regarding a medical package for Sir Bradley Wiggins delivered to the team at the 2011 Criterium du Dauphiné.
Today, a House of Commons select committee confirmed it had invited former Team Sky doctor Richard Freeman, the recipient of the package, and Simon Cope, the ex-British Cycling employee who flew out with it from the UK to the Alps, to testify before it next month.
> Former Team Sky doctor and Sir Bradley Wiggins Jiffy Bag courier summoned to testify before MPs
Add new comment
30 comments
The level of investigation on 60 Minutes makes 'Wish you were here' look like a hard hitting expose of the travel industry.
Such utter BS.
No proof apart from the fact that e bikes exist.
Varjas doesnt know what team he supplied to ? Well what bikes were they ? "fictional" is the correct answer.
He's just conned them out of thousands of dollars to put the motor in an old trek. You think he'd be ok for cash if he sold the motor for two million dollars ?
He's just a con artist.
TEAM SKY ATE MY HAMSTER
TEAM SKY BUS FOUND ON THE MOON
An interesting question is 'How mnay bikes/teams did the UCI stop French Authorities taking the wheel off'? For all we know they tried to take every wheel off every team and the UCI said 'Bugger off, you can't do that'. If they did lots of others but not Sky then there should be a reason. Although this all might mean facts getting in the way of the story.
Lightweight made a bike with just such a system - but look at how the frame wraps round the wheel : http://road.cc/content/news/128979-lightweight-show-e-bike-concept-eurobike
Doing it the way you are suggesting would result in a very ineffecient motor - you would either need an aweful lot of power, or very powerfull (heavy) magnets to make it worth while.
Cheers for the link, that's a pretty awesome e-bike.
At the pro level you'd probably only need a 10w motor to make a significant difference in w/kg so it's not inconceivable that you could miniaturise a version of that lightweight system.
Used intermittently you might be able to save on battery power too.
I'm no detective but it seems fairly obvious to me that there are a lot of different bike brands used by world tour teams, most of them quite distinctive in appearance.
An experienced bike engineer should easily be able to recall which model of bike he was asked to fit motors to.
It should therefore be easy to work out which team(s) he could potentially have been supplying.
The fact that this experienced engineer has claimed he had no idea which team he was supplying bikes to makes me think the whole story is nonsense.
The French have a distinct dislike for anything involving the words "cycling" and "British". Just look at the mud slinging from the French after the track team destroyed all comers in the velodrome.
If they had a chance of really nobbling Team Sky they would move heaven and earth to prove it regardless of what the UCI say.
You can guarantee that, I bet SKY spend as much money on their legal team as they do on their (Ahem) "Marginal Gains" programme.
For me, it's just not credible that a motor and battery that could deliver sufficient watts to make a difference would weigh less than a kilogramme. Looks like unsubstantiated nonsense to me.
Riiiight, so the UCI can stop the french police from checking some bikes that don't belong to them? I know nothing about the French legal system, but that sounds fishy to me.
And even if it were true, surely the headline should be "Fresh questions for UCI..." at least as much as "Fresh questions for Team Sky..."?
I can see that a team or individual time trial would be an effective place to use a hidden motor, but this really all does sounds pretty ridiculous.
I don't think I buy the idea that a heavier TT bike shows there must be a motor. Clearly weight isn't the priority with these bikes.
Froome must get so sick of this muck slinging.
https://youtu.be/Xn-oHTCgR84
So Team Sky invested vast sums of money and huge amounts of energy and ingenuity in order to come second to BMC? Yeah, right!
Sigh, another round of pure speculation masquerading as accusations... and it does seem that there is only one team worthy of suspicion in the pro pellaton these days
One thing French Authorities are good at is throwing their weight around. If they had an issue with an investigation, you would have thought they would have raised it at the time? Its a bit odd to keep quiet, wait two years then winge to a US tv program...
Its a hell of a lot easier to prove a motor was used than to prove PED abuse. This really is a black or white issue.
Its possible people have have chanced it several years ago back when the technology was (largely) unknown [But the noise would have been a big giveaway??] - but now the UCI are on the lookout, it would be desperate.
LeMond seems to go over the top a little too often. Keeping a critical eye on various aspects of the sport is one thing, but making everything into a conspiracy theory or lawsuit is too much.
Chris Froome will need the patience of a saint, already having the accusations of doping over the last few years, recently being asked about what Wiggins and Sky were up to and now this round of bullshit...
meh, he can get a tue for some valium
FAKE NEWS!
And strangely the fingers being pointed at Team Sky again!
What about Nibali's remarkable change in form at the end of last years Giro, doped or a motor?
I felt sympathy for Greg after what Loser Amstrong did to him, but ive lost my respect for him after this. I agree there maybe motors being used, but only by riders who are under the radar.
After all the testing not one positive, i know thats the kind of thing Armstrong would have said, but one should have been found by now.
why limit yourself?
And strangely the fingers being pointed at Team Sky again!
What about Nibali's remarkable change in form at the end of last years Giro, doped or a motor?
There was no "remarkable change in form". Kruijswijk crashed, ending his chances. Nibali moved into 2nd, 45 seconds behind Chaves who cracked after 3 weeks of tough racing. Chris Froome is the obvious target for people because he dominated the 2016 tour, whereas Nibali got lucky (Kruijswijk crashing) and launched one good attack.
"UCI officials prevented French authorities from weighing wheels"
Which "authorities" would they be then?
I've watched the CBS programme. It offers no evidence against anyone.
At best it's an advert for Varjas.
Agreed
Do they really think the UCI could stop the 'French Authority' from doing what they wanted to do? Just look at the doping raids in the Tour? Ok its more civilized these days, but the sport is 'cleaner' these days, not requiring such aggresive action, but the French have never been afraid of doing their job when required
This.
I love the idea that Clouseau and his comrades from the gendarmerie hang around stage finishes with a set of antique spring balances from a past life enforcing EU fishing regulations, waiting to weight the wheels of perfidious Anglos Saxon cycling teams...
It seems questions are being asking. I've heard a lot of people talking about it. I don't know anything about it, but it sees like there is a lot of talk, and I for one would like some answers to these questions, whatever they are.
I'd love to see the design of the rear-wheel motor. That'd make it more credible.
Python has a design, patent pending.
Maybe a solenoid coil through the stays, magnets in the wheel rim, coil synced to power on and off as the wheel rotated . That could provide a small boost each time the magnet passed through.
Not sure how powerful that would be though.
Zero evidence. The bikes in question were actually checked for mechanical motors at the time... So LeMond thinks the UCI were in on this?
Jees, let it go greg! Just sit there with your Yellow jerseys, have a beer and be happy.
I heard that the leading bike for the first few laps of an Olympic Kieran final was mechanically enhanced too.
Chuck it into the fan, wait for something to stick. Maybe I'm naive but Sky using mechanical advantage in the TdF is as likely as me winning the lottery without buying a ticket. Surely they too are not so naive so why do these stories get credence?
Fake news, apparently it's all the rage at the moment...