UK Sport has denied that it has called for the departure of British Cycling chairman Jonathan Browning in the wake of criticism of the organisation contained in the independent review, details of which were leaked last week.
The review reportedly says that British Cycling’s board “reversed” the findings of an internal investigation into the allegations of sexism made by track sprinter Jess Varnish against former Great Britain technical director Shane Sutton.
British Cycling ultimately upheld just one of nine charges against Sutton, who had resigned last April following further claims of bullying and discrimination against him that prompted UK Sport to order the independent review.
Yesterday, a report in the Observer said that senior figures in UK Sport considered Browning’s position to be “untenable.” Meanwhile, Varnish told the Mail on Sunday that the whole British Cycling board should resign.
But last night, UK Sport, the government agency which provides National Lottery cash to national governing bodies of Olympic and Paralympic sports, said it had supported Browning’s appointment as chairman.
He had been a non-executive director of British Cycling for three years prior to that, and replaced Bob Howden, who remains president.
The agency also said it helped approve the recent appointments of Julie Harrington as British Cycling’s chief executive, and of Stephen Park as performance director.
British Cycling has already outlined a 39-point joint action plan with UK Sport to make the "necessary changes to both culture and governance" in the wake of the independent review.
UK Sport said that both it and Sport England “supported the move that the British Cycling board took to elect Jonathan Browning, one of their independent board members, to chair the organisation, pending the agreement and implementation of that action plan."
It added that the action plan would need to be agreed "before any new funding flows from April 2017," with British Cycling due to receive £26 million in the current Olympic cycle, and that Harrington and Park "have an important role to play in delivering the necessary changes.".
Regarding the independent review, UK Sport said: "The boards of both organisations received a draft version in December and all parties have accepted the emerging recommendations of the panel in full.
"The board of British Cycling took early action to prepare a 39-point action plan based on the emerging findings and the recommendations of the review to systematically address the cultural and behavioural shortcomings in British Cycling and made a public commitment to focusing much more on their people, alongside the good work they do on participation and performance.
"UK Sport is satisfied that this plan addresses the findings and recommendations of the draft report."
The solution to the "issue" of no outer with suspension forks is obviously just to lock them out. This is no doubt why the lock-out function...
Could make a crass joke about how youre only supposed to flip pancakes today, but i wont...
So who's funding this judicial review? Follow the money road.cc.....
I can accept this under one condition:...
I wouldn't worry too much about the locks being picked, in nearly all cases of bike theft, those Ninja moped gangs, the only things they can pick...
"There's some complex engineering in these things"
They want to pick on The Others in general, rather than a specific group. Immigrants can hate Others just as much as Nigel Farage does.
There's no doubting how bad the sport must have been when a banker feels moral enough to criticise...!
I don't think they've come in from that end at all - all three approaches are bollarded, and I don't think there's room to get through. I think...
More clearance damnit!!!