- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Police officer speaks to driver at Bank Junction (picture courtsesy Bikesy.co_.uk).jpgUpdated: More than 9 in 10 drivers complying with Bank Junction ban
UPDATED: The City of London Corporation says that more than nine in 10 motorists are complying with a ban on vehicles other than buses and bicycles at Bank Junction.
The local authority that governs the Square Mile began an 18-month trial of the ban, which applies from 7am to 7pm on Mondays to Fridays, in May this year, and was responding to comments made by a Conservative MP who claimed the ban was motivated more by a desire to raise money through fining motorists who ignore it, rather than for safety concerns.
The ban, which is currently being undertaken on a trial basis, is aimed at making the junction safer for vulnerable road users, whether on foot or on a bike, as well as improving air quality and relieving congestion on the bus routes that run through it.
In a statement, the Corporation said: “Our number one priority for the experimental scheme at Bank junction is to improve safety. For too long it has been one of the capital’s dangerous hotspots.
“We have made every effort to inform the public of the traffic restrictions.
“This included generating publicity, meeting local businesses, residents and road user groups and sending over 16,500 letters.
“There are over 100 road signs and advance warnings in the area advising drivers about the closure to vehicles and we used the services of a sign expert to ensure these were as clear as possible. We also initially issued warning letters when the scheme started. >
“The objective of the Penalty Charge Notices is to act as a deterrent. >
“Any funds generated from the scheme will be held in reserve and as required by legislation directed towards funding various highway or road maintenance improvements.
“We now see less vehicles pass through the junction during the 12 hour restriction than would pass through in an hour, before the scheme was implemented.
"This equates to over 90 per cent compliance to the scheme.
"As a safety scheme, our end goal is to see 100 per cent compliance at the junction."
The introduction of the ban in May was welcomed by cycling campaigners, who had lobbied for safety improvements at the junction since the death there of 26-year-old Ying Tao in 2015, when she was crushed by a lorry as she rode to work.
> Day 1 of Bank Junction vehicle ban - but video shows some drivers ignoring it
While the City of London Corporation initially sent warning letters to motorists caught flouting the ban, in June it began fining them, with vehicle registrations captured using seven cameras equipped with Automatic Number Plate Recognition (APNR) technology around the junction.
Nevertheless, large numbers of motorists are continuing to drive through Bank Junction outside the permitted hours.
The Daily Star reports that an average of 1,498 drivers were fined each day between 7 June and 17 July, according to a Freedom of Information request.
With a fixed penalty notice of £130 being issued to transgressors, total fines during that period were almost £200,000 a day.
The newspaper extrapolates that to being equivalent to almost £50 million a year – although that figure, equivalent to around 375,000 individual fines, seems to assume that drivers would not change their behaviour after being caught the first time.
Charlie Elphicke, Conservative MP for Dover, told the Daily Star: “The cameras on this junction are fleecing motorists for £200,000 a day.
“Many people would say this looks like a case of revenue-raising rather than anything to do with traffic safety.
“Cameras [that] are simply there to raise revenue cause big resentment and are incredibly unfair,” he added.
Following Ying Tao’s death, the campaign group Stop Killing Cyclists held a vigil and die-in at the junction that was attended by hundreds of riders.
When the ban was implemented in May, the group’s co-founder, Donnachadh McCarthy, said it was an “historic day for cyclists and pedestrians in London.
He added: “We congratulate City of London for taking the steps to change the lifestyle for cyclists in the city.”
The introduction of the restrictions was also welcomed by Green Party London Assembly Member Caroline Russell, who described Bank as "a notoriously dangerous junction."
She said that incidents in which vulnerable road users are injured or killed "are happening to our friends and neighbours.
"Road safety isn't just a problem for someone, it's a problem for all Londoners,” she added.
In a guest blog published on road.cc in January this year, Christopher Hayward, chairman of the City of London Corporation’s Planning and Transportation Committee, outlined details of the experimental safety scheme.
The aim was “to improve the safety of road users and pedestrians with the aim of reducing casualties and improving air quality at one of London’s busiest junctions,” he wrote.
He continued: “A number of casualties and fatalities have highlighted very real concerns about safety at this junction.
“With cyclists now making up to 50 per cent of the traffic crossing the junction in peak times, we felt that it was fundamental that cyclist safety be seen as very important.”
He added that the City of London Corporation hoped the restrictions on motor vehicles would lead to a reduction in casualties of between 50 and 60 per cent.
Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Latest Comments
- ErnieC 53 min 39 sec ago
No chance of that ever being a human being.
- ErnieC 59 min 49 sec ago
Are there guidelines for when generalisations are valid?
- Pub bike 1 hour 1 min ago
Any divine entity would surely by now have helped humans implement self-driving cars that never cause harm so that there is no way this type of...
- Rome73 1 hour 37 min ago
I'm sorry I don't accept that the majority of cyclists are 'psychopaths'. There are some 'nutters' out there - but I would hazard a guess that most...
- Rik Mayals underpants 17 hours 7 min ago
Here's my cycling related Christmas gift. Beautiful enamel garage sign to go above my Campagnolo Super Record RS equipped Colnago.
- Rendel Harris 21 hours 15 min ago
No idea if Cancellara was using a motor or not, I hope not as I greatly enjoyed him as a rider, but the tech was certainly available, I can...
- SecretSam 1 day 4 min ago
Usual ugly Pinarello, bumps and curves where they aren't needed. And, according to Mapdec, not well built.
- Spangly Shiny 1 day 22 hours ago
I had the pleasure of owning two of the featured builders here, in my history. When I joined the Army in 1971, I took with me my curly Hetchins:...
Add new comment
36 comments
Thank you ribena, for making a little clearer what a travesty of so called democracy we live under. Unfortunately I'm sufficiently inured to the gravy train that I'm not surprised to find our elected 'representatives' coining it from the likes of the RHA.
What really worries me is that some are happy to go beyond 'lobbying' but lie (or regurgitate the lies of their sponsors ) for the sake of a few measly grand, and at the same time belittle unnecessary deaths and actively seek to defend those deaths as an unfortunate consequence of 'business as usual'.
I would recommend that Charlie Elphicke and his ilk be taken to the mortuary for a look at the broken remains of loved parents, siblings and children who die under the wheels of HGVs, so he can be better apprised of what it is he is defending for his thirty pieces of silver.
Strange headline road cc.
More than 9 in 10 cyclists don't use the motorway on their bikes but you put a story up every time one does!
@Bill H - no, that really isn't the only angle. The whole story arises from an MP from miles away sticking his oar in to voice the opinion of a lobby group that pays him.
And you need to walk around Docklands. HSBC has everything in its tower, including its execs and traders; the FCA is based a couple of doors down. That's just one block along one side of Canada Square.
The only money angle in this story is the Corporation of London competing with Westminster for financial firms deciding where to put their London HQ's (sorry LDDC, but docklands is for techies and back office, both soon to be off-shored or automated).
The City cannot boast the Royal Parks but it can make the journey to work a lot nicer. In Westminster the car is still King. That's a plus for today's old men in limo's but the generation behind them expect to be able to run or cycle into the office. Those are the people that the City aldermen are appealing to with these changes.
Without physical separation, cycles and cars cannot peacefully co-exist. For the sake of our economy and well-being, maybe cycling itself needs to take a hard look in the mirror - at least according to this article: https://www.accredited-times.com/2017/08/17/need-ban-cycling-now/
I've got 5 bikes and 2 cars, sometimes the bikes go inside the cars. I have never known them to fight, maybe I just brought them up well.
Or, perhaps you meant that drivers will always kill and maim other road users?
I bet air pollution has also dropped significantly in the local vicinity.
I rode through this junction a few times on a boris bike needing to turn righ towards monument.
Had my first chance to do so again last week - it is SO much safer! There were few places in London where I have felt unsafe doing the right thing - but the right turn I'm talking about is up hill and a distance from the light you have travelled from - traffic was always coming at you!
Now with the number of cars much reduced it is really nice! Plus there are so many pedestrians its like a new world - truly wonderful and should be the vision of London in the future.
Imagine the whole place with no trucks or cars between 7am and 7pm it would be a beautiful city!!!
For now I will enjoy my occaisonal visits a lot more - just wish they put a few coppers there on a regular basis to give out the 3 points to the drivers that they should be gettting -not exactl driving with due care going past six sets of signs saying you are not allowed beyond this point!
I would think that my learned friend could extrapolate from this that there are too many drivers breaking the law.
Why therefore is he not suggesting re-education?
I saw on other reports that the FoI/press release on it, that he was responding to, came from Fair Fuel Uk, who are very much an astroturf organisation
"MP says ..."
Equals lies.
According to the bbc, there is a woman in Oxfordshire with 51 points, and stll allowed to drive.
One thing about the £200,000 a day received in fines: what do people, especially locals, think happens to that money? Or to put it another way, would the majority of people prefer £200,000 a day to be raised through traffic fines or in some other way, such as council tax, local sales tax, etc?
Prick
Really looking forward to the facts and figures once this has been in place for 6 months or a year...
Would really like to see fines doubling each time the same driver repeats the offence, should make them learn faster and clear the junction of cars quicker?
I'm sure it's just a coincidence, but Charlie Elphicke receives 22,000 pounds from the Road Haulage Association, who are opposed to this ban.
https://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/24777/charlie_elphicke/dover#register
https://www.rha.uk.net/news/2017-04-april/rha-messenger-26-april
Thanks for that - I couldn't work out what Elphicke had to gain by this.
He's actually done a lot of public-spirited stuff: his work for the Public Administration Committee on bringing the religious aspect to charity recognition up-to-date; the public buy-out of Dover port; the investigation of multinational tax-dodging.
This is just a really disappointingly obvious bit of lobbying which runs contrary to the public interest, in an area of the country that has jack-all to do with him. It's bribery or corruption by another name.
Funny that...politicians following the opinions of their donors. Can't say I've ever heard of that happening before....
Reminiscent of another non-London MP telling Londoners how to manage their transport system - Rob Flello. Also RHA funded.
To be entirely sure, though, I guess one would need to look at all MPs who have had money from that source, and see if there's a significant correlation with random pro-motorist interventions. Maybe the RHA just fund loads of MPs?
Hmm, you're right.
RHA donations..
https://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/11843/rob_flello/stoke-on-trent_south#...
Views against cycle lanes...
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/cyclists-increase-congestion-air-po...
road.cc you need to do some investigating!
yep c'mon journos it's not just about the review kit and the swag!
another yes please here
I think you're reading far much into this: the MP for Dover is simply concerned that this ban on cars at this junction in London will affect his constituents. 78% of drivers in Dover all drive through the bank junction every day at 8am, didn't you know?
I cycle through Bank every day, the restriction has completely transformed the junction and the atmosphere around there. Not sure what skin the MP for Dover has in the game...
I do wonder if I would spot the signs if I didn't know about the fine, but they've put more up and it's a driver's responsibility to read road signs, isn't it?
As do I on my Doris bike; far safer and has knocked 4 minutes off my 14 m journey. Typical MP saying what his paymasters tell him to say.
Probably more effective to have some sort of temporary barrier to stop cars etc but then that might affect the non existant requirement for revenue...cough.
Buses are allowed through so, a physical barrier would be difficult.
Seems to work in Manchester.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWnfeDtnuds
That silver car getting caught after seeing the barriers up in the first place absolutely cracks me up. Please can we have some of these in London? I can't wait for the compilation of hundreds of Uber Priuses getting caught
One observation by the way - the £200k figure is almost certainly false. The tickets will be £65 if paid (or contested) within 14 days, so just under £100k. Still a massive chunk of money, it would be nice if they used it for further 'public space improvements' in the City...
There's some speculation that the PCNs are not valid either
Pages