Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Video: Pink Kittens film highlights the danger of using your phone while driving

Campaigners call for tougher punishments and for law to also cover hands-free use of phones

A new campaign from THINK! challenges the misconception that a quick glance at your phone won’t hurt by highlighting how much a driver can miss in just a couple of seconds.

“At 30mph a car travels 100 ft in 2.3 seconds,” states the video. “You miss more than you think when you glance down at your phone.”

In March 2017, the penalties for mobile phone use at the wheel were increased to 6 points and £200. However, the RAC Report on Motoring 2017 saw 23 per cent of drivers admit to using a handheld mobile at the wheel to make or take a call in the past 12 months, while 12 per cent admitted to checking texts, email or social media.

THINK! cites research published in the BMJ which found that you are four times more likely to be in a crash if you use your phone (even when using it hands-free) and an IAM RoadSmart study which found that reaction times are two times slower if you text and drive than if you drink drive.

However, Duncan Dollimore, Cycling UK’s Head of Advocacy and Campaigns, said that awareness campaigns alone were not enough.

“Whatever your thoughts on the video might be, telling people to put their phone away while driving is the right message. However, it is not enough to tell people to put their phones away if there is no fear of being caught and little chance of losing your licence.

“The Government’s famous “Don’t drink and drive” campaign combined public awareness messaging with a tangible threat of being caught and with a real punishment. If our Government is truly serious about tackling the dangers of mobile phone use at the wheel, then it needs to introduce penalties which deter, such as driver bans, and moreover reversing the downward trend in our roads policing by making it a national priority.”

Adding to the evidence against hands-free use of phones at the wheel is new research by The Open University and the University of Sussex which found that drivers using phones in this way may react to fewer than half the hazards identified by undistracted drivers.

Kevin Clinton, Head of Road Safety at the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA), said: “There’s a significant distraction risk involved with hands-free mobile phones. Ideally, when the mobile phone law was introduced, it would have covered hands-free mobile phones and made them illegal to use. However, the practical issues of enforcing it meant that it was not feasible to do so.

“We think the law should include hands-free phones. Although it is very difficult for the police to detect drivers using hands-free phones just by observation, they can see if a person’s driving is affected because they are distracted, and for more serious crashes or offences, phone records can be checked.”

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

6 comments

Avatar
BehindTheBikesheds | 7 years ago
2 likes

Pointless, have you seen the size of the fucking screen on a Tesla, it's about 12" from top to bottom and about 7" wide. I watched the other day on the local news and the test driver (from lotus) saying how it would achieve x miles now and do this and that and he was accessing the internet  whilst driving to find the charging points.

Governments allow this shit in motors, THEY are culpable in the deaths that occur on our roads and footways and by not cracking down on the use of ICE and other gadgets that are somehow necessary in motors to drive them!

Avatar
Jimmy Ray Will | 7 years ago
0 likes

So, I'm all for stopping drivers using their phones whilst driving, but at the same time, I'm not sure what level of risk a driver poses looking at his phone when stationary in a traffic queue.

For me you have to differentiate between the two, because if you don't, you can't expect people to differentiate the risk between that and driving in urbanbareas at 30 gawking at their screens... sadly.

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to Jimmy Ray Will | 7 years ago
3 likes
Jimmy Ray Will wrote:

So, I'm all for stopping drivers using their phones whilst driving, but at the same time, I'm not sure what level of risk a driver poses looking at his phone when stationary in a traffic queue.

For me you have to differentiate between the two, because if you don't, you can't expect people to differentiate the risk between that and driving in urbanbareas at 30 gawking at their screens... sadly.

Left turning lorries at traffic lights killing cyclists because they didn't check their mirrors while stationary at the lights?

Avatar
SingleSpeed | 7 years ago
4 likes

I will regulary walk along a major arterial road right next to a Police staion to get to Waitrose.

If I was to sit there with a video camera filming into the cabins of the cars I would say maybe 30% of those were doing something with their phones, I'll often bang on their windows with the universal hand gesture of driver dissaproval. My Guess is that these chumps crawling along in traffic will also be doing much the same thing when they're driving along at 'cruising/death' speeds.

 

The point being, if the Plods did some sort of "Sting" walking down the roads looking into the cabins of cars and giving them Fine's on the spot this shit just wouldn't be an issue

Avatar
kitsunegari | 7 years ago
4 likes

Any incident involving a driver on a mobile phone needs to be treated with presumed liability, and as manslaughter.

You are knowingly risking the lives of everyone around you when you use your mobile phone whilst driving. This makes you a cunt.

Avatar
pjm60 | 7 years ago
6 likes

We've had decades of gory, emotional, and well-produced awereness campaigns. It doesn't matter: drivers aren't thinking of risk when they glance at their phone, send a text, or need to change the song.

 

How did seatbelts become the done thing? Law.

Why do people wear seatbelts in cars but not where provided on buses? Risk of getting caught.

Why is drink driving much less socially acceptable? Law and driving bans.

 

Presumed liability would be a big step forward and, maybe, a little trump inspiration "Ban the **** out of them". Getting drivers who can't be trusted to drive responsibly off the roads is key to the safety of all road users.

 

Latest Comments