Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Sadiq Khan urges government: Let us use Londoners’ ‘roads tax’ to help fund growth in cycling and walking in capital

The unwelcome return of 'road tax' follows pledge to ring-fence Vehicle Excise Duty made by George Osborne in 2015 Budget...

Mayor of London Sadiq Khan has urged the government to let Transport for London (TfL) use ‘roads tax’ paid by the capital's drivers to help fund growth in cycling and walking, as well as on the city's roads.

The reference to ‘roads tax’ came in a press release yesterday announcing TfL’s draft budget for 2018/19, the first year of its new five-year business plan.

It was no accident, with money raised by the government through Vehicle Excise Duty (VED) set to be ring-fenced for use exclusively on roads under reforms announced by George Osborne in 2015 when he was Chancellor of the Exchequer.

TfL’s latest budget sees it have to balance the books against the backdrop of a £700 million cut in central government funding.

“With the removal of the government grant, this will be the first year that TfL has had to address the critical and unique demands of London’s road network, including congestion, maintenance, renewals and air quality, without support from the government,” the press release said.

“Both TfL and the Mayor are calling on the government, as part of their Transport Investment Strategy, to make sure that a link between ‘roads tax’ and roads funding is applied to London as well.

“This would allow TfL and the boroughs to continue modernising London's road network, as well as support more walking and cycling journeys across the capital.

The press release continued: “From 2021, the £500 million raised every year from Londoners’ Vehicle Excise Duty will be collected by central government and only invested in roads outside the capital.”

As cycling journalist and author Carlton Reid points out on his I Pay Road Tax website, nowadays there is no such thing as ‘road tax’.

The process to abolish it was begun by Sir Winston Churchill in 1926, with the Road Fund, raised from motorists and ring-fenced to be spent on roads, disappearing in 1937.

Currently, motorists are required to pay VED each year, based on their vehicle’s emissions, or engine size for vehicles registered before 1 March 2001. Less-polluting and some older vehicles are exempt.

Roads are now funded from a mix of general and local taxation, and money raised through VED is not ring-fenced for use exclusively on roads – but that is set to change under the reforms unveiled Osborne in his June 2015 Budget, his first for a Conservative majority government.

Outlining changes to VED, he said: “I will return this tax to the use for which it was originally intended.

“I am creating a new Roads Fund. From the end of this decade, every single penny raised in vehicle excise duty in England will go into that Fund to pay for the sustained investment our roads so badly need.

“Tax paid on people’s cars will be used to improve the roads they drive on. It is a major reform to improve the infrastructure and productivity of our economy – and deliver a fairer tax system for the motorist.”

Osborne’s words were in stark contrast to those of one of his most illustrious predecessors as Chancellor, Churchill, who in a note to Treasury officials in 1925 wrote: “Entertainments may be taxed; public houses may be taxed; racehorses may be taxed … and the yield devoted to the general revenue.

“But motorists are to be privileged for all time to have the whole yield of the tax on motors devoted to roads. Obviously this is all nonsense … Such contentions are absurd, and constitute … an outrage upon the sovereignty of Parliament and upon common sense.”

Despite the fact the Road Fund was abolished eight decades ago, anyone who cycles on Britain’s roads will know that many motorists still take the view that ‘road tax’ exists and that people on bikes should not therefore be on the public highway since they don’t pay it.

Such views not only miss the point that road tax doesn’t exist and the VED they pay goes into a central pot together with other forms of taxation, but also that most adult cyclists also own cars (and are in fact more likely to come from multiple car-owning households than the average driver), and even if they were subject to some kind of duty, in line with the least polluting vehicles, they would pay nothing.

But under the forthcoming reforms, those motorists may feel even more of a sense of entitlement - although it's worth noting that at the time of Osborne's announcement, the £6 billion raised annually through VED was dwarfed by the £27 billion gained from fuel duty, which won't be ring-fenced.

As a result, there will be a shortfall between the amount of money set aside for roads through VED, and the amount of expenditure on them.

Commenting on the TfL draft budget, London’s Transport Commissioner, Mike Brown, said: “This budget sets out what we will deliver in the next year as part of the Mayor’s Transport Strategy as we work to achieve his vision for 80 per cent of journeys to be made by walking, cycling and public transport by 2041. 

“We will continue with our massive programme of investment in the transport network, modernising and boosting capacity, delivering healthier safer streets and providing affordable and accessible transport that will support London’s economic growth. 

“This will be achieved alongside our extensive savings programme which is reducing our day to day costs, while protecting frontline services, as we manage a £700 million per year reduction in government subsidy. 

“This will put us well on the way to generating an operating surplus for the first time in our history in 2021/22.”    

Deputy Mayor for Transport, Val Shawcross, commented: “The next year will be a truly exciting time for London, with the opening of the Elizabeth Line, and major projects like the transformation of Oxford Street.

“At the same time, today’s budget shows how we’re also looking to the future with further tube modernisation and an unprecedented commitment to walking and cycling infrastructure.

“Through our major programme of TfL efficiencies, I’m proud that despite the removal of our government grant, we’re both freezing TfL fares and building a world-class transport network that will improve quality of life for Londoners all across our city.”   

TfL’s board will consider the draft budget on Tuesday 20 March.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

41 comments

Avatar
Dnnnnnn replied to BehindTheBikesheds | 6 years ago
3 likes

BehindTheBikesheds wrote:

these days whenever I'm back there it's absolutely horrific, just descended into a free for all.

Don't worry, it's mostly OK on the other days.

BehindTheBikesheds wrote:

London is quite literally imploding

It really isn't.

BehindTheBikesheds wrote:

Take Crossrail as an example, what is it now at £70Bn (Originally £14.8Bn), it'll still be a load of pony.

Err, no. I think Crossrail is roughly on budget, although costs have crept up a little latterly.

You might be confusing your higher figure with HS2, which is something entirely different.

BehindTheBikesheds wrote:

Personally I'd level the whole city

It's an unusual manifesto pledge but we did vote for Boris twice, and Sadiq has been disappointing thus far, so you might have a chance.

Avatar
Beecho replied to alansmurphy | 6 years ago
5 likes

alansmurphy wrote:

As a Northerner that visits the Capital 4/5 times a year, I had great fun for an hour on a Boris bike today. City is full of wankers, on foot, bike and car. I wasn't embarrassed to be a cyclist but a member of the human race!

I’ve spent years batting back such comments, but yeah, we’re leaving. I’m an actual Londoner, but it’s all too much now. Probably an age thing, but it IS crazier, more stressful and more miserable than it’s ever been. 

No need for me to leave for work till 8.30 every morning, but I leave at 7 to make it less chaotic. 

On a vaguely related note, I might be a little late today as the wife’s just given me breakfast with Marmite on the toast. Grounds for divorce...

Avatar
BehindTheBikesheds | 6 years ago
4 likes

So what about the tax dodgers that do pollute, you know those who supposedly produce less than 99gCo2 per km though that's only in the lab in best case scenario with all the accuracy of a tissue over the exhaust to measure smoke particles. That's not even taking into account the fact that government allow the Euro6 vehicles to have a 100% leeway on their emissions until 2020 (conformity factor), that doesn't even take into account that London motyor traffic is nowhere near the 30mph average speed used for Euro6 'real world' testing so produce massively more actual pollution.

Don't even get me started on the tax dodging EVs!

Bang up the tax on fuel, bang up the tax on EVs and no more free electricty for EV users, then you might actually see a change in use of motors which is one of the prime reasons why the roads are in such a shit state to begin with and money spent on roads for motors. 

Avatar
ex_terra | 6 years ago
2 likes

Sadiq Khan made a completely unaffordable pledge to freeze all fares as part of his mayoral campaign. He told the many people who said this was an political gimmick they were fools. 

Two years on the capex budget at tfl has had to be slashed to subsidise a partial fare cap with a knock on to long term transport improvement schemes that everyone benefits from. And now he wants top up funds to replace the funds he did have but frittered away buying office.

The joke is on thick Londoners who voted for a mayor with no grasp of finances and who has sat on his hands when it comes to new cycle routes - 6 schemes were ready to go when he took office but none have been started and all we hear is empty soundbites from the Nike “walking” czar he employed to advise on cycling.

Avatar
matthewn5 replied to ex_terra | 6 years ago
3 likes

ex_terra wrote:

Sadiq Khan made a completely unaffordable pledge to freeze all fares as part of his mayoral campaign. He told the many people who said this was an political gimmick they were fools. 

Two years on the capex budget at tfl has had to be slashed to subsidise a partial fare cap with a knock on to long term transport improvement schemes that everyone benefits from. And now he wants top up funds to replace the funds he did have but frittered away buying office.

The joke is on thick Londoners who voted for a mayor with no grasp of finances and who has sat on his hands when it comes to new cycle routes - 6 schemes were ready to go when he took office but none have been started and all we hear is empty soundbites from the Nike “walking” czar he employed to advise on cycling.

Ahem.

Compared to Boris 'Garden Bridge' Johnson, the Tories have given Khan £700m less to spend on London transport than his predecessor. The princely sum of zero pounds. You can bet that instead, it will be spent out in the shires featherbedding roads in Tory electorates.

That's why Khan's got less to spend on cycle tracks, Crossrail 2, cycle bridges, etc etc.

We could have used the £52m Johnson sank into the Thames for the Garden Bridge, frankly. Or the £36 million he spent on the dangleway, which doesn't have a single regular user. This article adds up £940m that Johnson wasted on useless projects:

https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/architecture-design-blog/2016/j...

But yeah, blame Khan, yawn.

Avatar
EddyBerckx | 6 years ago
3 likes

Way to get 1000's of perfectly reasonable white van men and black cabbies on our side....

...thinking about it...is he just trolling them? Should we just laugh at it? 80 years of no road tax hasnt stoppee the abuse, maybe just roll with it!!!

Avatar
Leviathan | 6 years ago
6 likes

Ah, road tax, our old friend.

Avatar
brooksby replied to Leviathan | 6 years ago
2 likes

Leviathan wrote:

Ah, road tax, our old friend.

Excellent use of a Star Trek gif (and Montalban was so much better than Cumberbatch... )

Avatar
Leviathan replied to brooksby | 6 years ago
1 like

brooksby wrote:

Leviathan wrote:

Ah, road tax, our old friend.

Excellent use of a Star Trek gif (and Montalban was so much better than Cumberbatch... )

I've never been as disappointed by a movie in the theatre. I've seen plenty of worse movies, but mostly at home, where you have little or no expectations for them. This was a Star Trek movie and following on from a really fresh and exciting reboot. And sure it looked good, but the constant callbacks and character swaps were annoying. I groaned out loud when Kirk died in the reactor and Spock was outside this time. I mean who was this movie for? If it was a Wrath of Khan remix; I don't need that I want something new, and if it was for a new audience then they won't get the references anyway. Just perplexing. And then JJ made the Force Awakens, another rehash; only rescued because he had to use new characters. I was not best pleased when they gave him Episode IX.

 

Sorry, off topic I know.

Avatar
janusz0 replied to Leviathan | 6 years ago
4 likes

Leviathan wrote:

I've never been as disappointed by a movie in the theatre.

You should try watching in the cinema, it'll give you a whole new perspective.

Avatar
Beecho | 6 years ago
7 likes

With due respect to those who’ve used it before...

Pages

Latest Comments