Writing in the Sunday Telegraph, Skinner - who holds the Lead Athlete position of the independent Global Athlete organisation - has called for a complete overhaul of how British Elite sport is run. There were further allegations of bullying that emerged at the Richard Freeman tribunal last week, while there has recently been controversy over athletes' sponsorship deals being restricted at the Olmypics, and numerous female athletes referring to an 'old boys club' mentality in coaching team set-ups. He wrote: “The system has lost its way and fault lies at the top.
"The system worked well when UK Olympic athletes first began turning full-time. Athletes were older, often university or trade-educated, and were paid and treated as equals. Athletes are now younger, turning full-time at 17, and sometimes that youth has brought naivety. This is a demographic that has been exploited. Through some of the most successful times British Sport has ever witnessed, no-one has benefitted more than management. It’s high time for change.”
Skinner also gave more details to SportBusiness about the British Olympic Association's 'Rule 40', which protects the exclusivity of the International Olympic Committee's major sponsors, while requiring brands to have all their promotional activities for the Olympics planned by May 2020: “I take a similar stance to the Jess Varnish employment case, the claimants are stating the current rules are unlawful and it’s the defendants job to argue that they are.
It goes both ways, I have benefited from BOA partners, in an obvious sense in terms of attending the Games and the support they provide. I have also done additional paid appearances for BOA partners. It’s hard to quantify to what extent I have been negatively affected. I could have benefited from a personal sponsorship perspective if I had had rights to my image and the freedom to promote sponsors during the games.
“I presume that if I had those rights I personally would have been able to capitalise on Rio 2016 to a greater extent. It varies from sport to sport but as an athlete I found the British Cycling contract more restrictive as they have a series of large commercial partners where they offer exclusivity. In other national federations it’s a different story. The distribution of funds across UK Sport, National Federations and the BOA needs to be looked at. At British Cycling, some management members can be paid 10 times or more than Paralympic champions on the team.”
While Germany, the US and Australia's Olympic committees have also softened their Rule 40 stance, 26 British athletes are currently taking legal action against the BOA, led by sprinter Adam Gemili.
Add new comment
7 comments
On a different note, has anybody looked closely at that Aesir? I went to the website and now I'm sorry I bought a gravel bike last March. A nice looking bike, maybe it is the blue. Mind you, if you get carried away using the bike builder it can get a wee bit expensive.
Too much news perhaps.
"Just" 4 riders, or 4/5 not bad really is it.
It is obviously 'Pros pissing about season.'
Nifty bottle trick.
US Bridge: They are all going the same way, what do they know?
Not bad, as you say, but surely in the whole of GB there is another bloke and two women who'd be worth a place on the team? Its embarassing that we can't field a whole team, given the resources that's been flung at British Cycling over the years.
I do like Dr Hutch's musings... true what he says. Its depressing how acceptable it is to publicly hate groups of people, be it cyclists, people of a different political opinion, boomers, etc.
It's got nothing to do with Team GB not being able to field another rider(s), it's just that GB has only been allocated 4/2 rider places by the UCI.
Regarding Hutchie’s musings on everyone hating cyclists, it doesn’t help when the BBC allow the programme Room 101 to be broadcast with one participant claiming to ‘hate’ Lycra clad cyclists that he describes as ‘all fascists’ and the host agreeing. Any other group castigation in this way would be considered as bigotry or even a hate crime. It was broadcast earlier this evening, but apparently was first aired in 2017.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3R2RB6enk8
Perhaps some complaints to Ofcom would be appropriate?
PP
Please stop this victim mentality. Everything somebody doesn't like being said is now a 'hate crime'. No somebody just doesn't like you. I served a good apprenticeship of being physically bullied at school so all this 'he called me a bad name' stuff is laughable.
I'm a cyclist - people hate me - so what
I'm a motorcyclist - people hate me - so what
I used to drive an Audi - people hate me - so what
And so on. People will always dislike something you do or are. How far do we take this sort of thing? "somebody said Fornite is rubbish, it's a hate crime against me"?
I don't feel oppressed as a cyclist, I generally feel liberated. Just need to have your wits about you sometimes.
It's one thing to be hated and/or disliked, but there seems to be actual violence taking place on our roads and a completely disproportionate response by the courts and various ridiculous schemes being proposed by politicians. These are results of the culture of cyclist hatred that seems to be promoted by mainstream media. If politicians were going around proposing that all Fortnite players had to wear certain clothes or were allowed to be assaulted in public, then it'd be reasonable to speak out against Fortnite-hate crimes.
Personally, I don't feel oppressed, but there's many potential cyclists who are put off due to all the negative bullshit portrayed by the press and the BBC.