Sustrans have acquired funding to improve the busiest part of the popular off-road path to prevent conflicts from arising at the busiest times of day.
A 1.7 mile stretch between Trinity Street (the beginning of the path) and Clay Bottom has been identified as the section marked for improvement, and described as a "victim of its own success" due to the number of people using it during peak times, which can be up to 1,800 an hour. James Cleeton of Sustrans says although they've been encouraging path users to 'share, respect and enjoy' with their One Path initiative, he admits physical changes would help to solve some of the issues: "We’ve spoken to over 250 people, either out on the Path, in community meetings, online or in specific user groups, to learn from them about what they need. This has included conversations with school communities, disability groups, older people groups, local community organisations, and walking and cycling campaign groups.
"We’ve heard that the excessive speed and close-passing of a handful of the people cycling on the path really does put others off using it. Some parents have even chosen to drive their children to school, instead of using the Path for that reason."
Cleeton says a number of suggestions have been put forward, including widening stretches of the path to enable segregation between cyclists and walkers and encouraging cyclists to find alternative routes of the busier sections; however the majority weren't calling for segregation, and as the Path represents "a much-valued traffic-free space", banning cyclists from some sections has been ruled out.
Cleeton added: "In the next couple of days, we’re holding more workshops with the community to talk to them about the ideas that have been coming out. We’re going to work with them to refine those design ideas so that we can start to develop some firmer designs. Should we ask people to adopt certain thinking while using the path, for example, everybody keep to the left? Maybe we ask people to ring their bells if they want to overtake.
"We will also invite scrutiny of designs from various people who have technical or ‘lived experience’ wisdom to offer. This will help us to further develop the designs for a path that will become ever more inclusive while remaining loved and cherished by the local community."
Add new comment
21 comments
Tyre and brake dust is directly attributable to traffic volume, but other airborne pollution, from the internal combustion engine, more from desiel, goes up with congestion. It doesn't take much reduction in traffic volume to massively reduce congestion. Notice how much less queues of cars there are on a Friday morning, only a few more people have Fridays off than any other day. And the massively reduced congestion during the school holidays, what's that a reduction of 10-20%, if that.
We only have to get a few people out of their motor vehicles and air quality improves.
But of course if you reduce congestion and make journey times in cars more predictable, you remove the advantages of the very predictable journey times that active travel can bring, so driving up car journeys. Ho hum.
Doing the shopping by bicycle, you generally get to park right by the shop, often closer than the blue badge spaces and closer than the weird family spots. I live (according to the john lewis website) 50m away from my local Waitrose, even closer for Iceland, and my bakers and butchers, too close to even bother using my shopping trolley (Rosler, fine spanish trolley), but when we finally move I will probably get a bike trailer, possibly the Surly Ted, big, heavy and shockingly expensive, but very customisable and an investment.
You just need the right bike: Something like a Tern GSD ( Kona Ute if you've got strong legs), get a weeks shopping on there.
Getting from "57% of car journeys made in Britain are five miles or less" to "With 57% of car trips made in Great Britain easily feasible by bike or on foot" is a mightily impressive leap.
I travel 5 miles into town for the weekly grocery shopping. I suppose if I did three or four trips I could do it on a bike. Or I could walk but I wouldn't fancy dragging a loaded shopping trolley 5 miles home. And that's just one example, there are lots more.
Some of that 57% could be done by bike or on foot but certainly not all.
But it's the kind of leap we need to make,my grandparents never owned a car and managed to do all their weekly shopping in shops over 2miles from where they lived, so it is possible it takes more planning for sure, but it crazes me to see people drive such short distances and then complain about traffic congestion
Yep..climate change and pollution in general has massively increased since WW2; think of how few chemicals were used prior,no nuclear prior,the proliferation of motor vehicles and airline flights since..
Just don't do such a huge shop. Do smaller shops, more frequently.
More frequent smaller shops works well if you can combine them with a commute that you have to do anyway, but few people will want an extra 5 mile each way bike ride for shopping several times a week instead of one drive.
Another option is to have heavy bulky predictable stuff ordered online and delivered, and have a smaller shop to carry yourself (delivery will usually be by motor vehicle, but one that is carrying shopping for several people, so typically more efficient on average).
Or use a trailer: https://road.cc/content/news/5936-oxfordshire-gets-new-waitrose-bike-tra...
Or just recognise that some weekly trips that are less than five miles but not feasible are balanced by numerous trips that are more than five miles but still feasible.
Sounds like good training pulling along a trailer or carrying a heavy rucksack to me.
Maybe supermarkets should start hiring jobless youths to deliver shopping on cargo bikes - you do your shopping as normal and hand over your trolley to the delivery person who'd deliver it later on (presumably combining several deliveries in your area). That would reduce the number of motorised vehicles, improve air quality and maybe increase activity levels.
I have gone from driving 12,000km annually to less than 5,000km thanks largely to the cargo bike. That’s almost 60 percent. Carrying a week’s shopping is no problem. There are other alternatives of course, an Andersen Shopper combined with a coupler so you can tow it with a regular bike might suffice.
Its very easy to come up with excuses why something can’t be done. Making a lifestyle change requires making a commitment, and breaking old habits. If you’re not prepared to make changes, nothing will. Conversely, you don’t realise how much unnecessary driving you do until you commit to a change.
I can get a weeks groceries in the pannier bags no problem, however I pass the shops on the way back from work, much as many people who drive short distances do so you don't have to go out of your way very much for the vast majority of these people who are doing the short journeys
By posting on here, I assume you're familiar with this thing called the internet.
People use it for shopping. Yep - groceries, bikes, cars, books, flowers, taxis, just about anything you can think of. Even my 80 year old Mum taught herself to do her weekly grocery shopping online. Supermarkets will deliver your order at any time of day until 10 or 11pm, every day of the week. Might be worth a look.
My kids rode 3 miles each way to school from the age of 11. They are not athletes, it was just that I cycled to work and they knew they could do the same (and walking would take an hour or more each way, not an appealling prospect for either of them). Most kids are driven to school in cars and the school run causes significant congestion and pollution. Once children get to ride to school they are able to make other trips by bike. It's hugely liberating and, given the chance, they'll be far more likely to cycle throughout their lives. It also has huge physical and mental health implications.
Bahrain Mclaren, crisp kit, I like the triangles, and the F1 team, interesting. Googles 'Bahrain Human rights...' Nope!
Why the extinction rebellion news all the time?
Most of the activity is just disruption related not cycling related.
To give you something to moan about instead of trans people.
Truck driver wasn't wearing a belt and was thrown to the right-hand side of the cab, whereas the wheel is on the left - no wonder he couldn't save the lorry from tipping over. Musta felt 100% impotent.
Another Russian 'why do I have to follow road rules' video..Indian and Chinese road crash video's depicting similar cavalier attitudes to safe driving are also plentiful on u-tube.
"The bikes that will power our riders"
Blimey... that video with the car, truck and cyclist near miss. Lucky fella. And kudos for him getting up and going to help the truck driver!
'help' the truck driver
Now I would never dispute that the motor car is a massive contributor towards polluting this planet of ours, and that most short journeys made by car could be made using other forms of transport.
But, and I also know that it takes a fair bit keeping up to a two tonne vehicle on the road and stopping it, don't I, on my little old bicycle, generate tyre and brake particles?
Perhaps several orders of magnitude less, but I do wear out tyres and brakes.
And indeed rubber/plastic shoe soles.
Goverrnments allow farmers to spray poisons - herbicides,pesticides,fungicides,etc., on food crops; I think we need to stop that before worrying about the pollution from bicycle tyre wear..although that wear can be dramatically reduced by using hard compound tyres but then they don't grip so well.