With the threat of the virus continuing to hang over the professional peloton as racing resumes, CCC Team have been forced to withdraw Lukasz Wlsniowski and Szymon Sajnok from their Tirreno–Adriatico squad with suspected coronavirus cases.
A statement said: "Wiśniowski withdrew from stage seven after developing mild symptoms during the stage and underwent a rapid test on Sunday evening which indicated a positive result. Wiśniowski will undergo a PCR test to confirm the result.
"As per CCC Team’s Covid-19 policy, Wiśniowski’s roommate Szymon Sajnok has automatically been withdrawn from racing and will also undergo a PCR test."
All other members of the team and staff underwent rapid testing twice on Sunday evening and Monday morning, with CCC reporting that all these tests came back negative. It means that five remaining CCC riders will line up for the eighth and final stage, a 10.1km individual time trial.
Unlike the Tour de France, RCS Sport - the organisers of the Tirreno–Adriatico and Giro D'Italia - are not enforcing the "two strikes and you're out rule" with coronavirus cases like the Tour de France, instead just asking that those who test positive should immediately isolate.
The Giro's race director Mauro Vegni told La Gazzetta dello Sport: “I’ll test them, I'll check them, but I won’t send the team home. I think that’s correct and respectful towards people who don’t have anything to hide in such a situation.
"Those who test positive certainly aren't bandits. Obviously I will try to protect them from a health point of view, but I’m not going to invalidate the work of a team that has been preparing for a year for a big event.”
Add new comment
35 comments
45-year-old sets new British everesting record. Chapeau to Phil Stonelake. Crowecombe Hill is pretty hardcore - even riding it once is quite a challenge for most, but this dude did it 58 (FIFTY EIGHT) times!! And at some pace by the sound of it...
7 hours 44 is quite incredible, especially for an amateur with a full-time job, family etc.
Phil is raising money for author Michael Morpurgo's charity Farms for City Children.
https://www.justgiving.com/fundraising/phil-stonelakeeveresting
Road congestion levels in outer London higher than before lockdown
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/sep/15/road-congestion-leve...
I really want to like bike lights integrated in pedals, but in this case both the forward- and rear-facing lights are the same colour (understandable in a symmetric flat pedal), and the legalistic folk would want a red rear light. Plus, in practice, much of the light's coverage will be obscured by your shoe or your wheel. So it seems to be more like a Kickstarter product than something from the seasoned experts at Look.
You'd think lights integrated with a pedal would be amber...
As pedals are left / right specific, a simple "which way up" detector in each pedal could set the front and rear facing led colour.
The legalistic folk would actually want reflectors in the pedals, not lights instead. They'd be right too.
Sounds like the supers been given a bit of a telling off
https://twitter.com/WMerciaPolice/status/1305531742506364929
Operation Close Pass back on
Sounds like the supers been given a bit of a telling off
Operation Close Pass back on
I think your interpretation is correct. She should have realised she was going to get a pasting for that nonsense. What they might do now is 'not try very hard'
I'm going for a new Ever-resting record. So far I've ridden zero miles, done zero climbing, but I've achieved 100% resting figures. Should I be writing to the Guinness book of records?
I like the film set. Did any of you guys get cameos? I'm thinking Big Dave as a gendarme and VecchioJo as Jean-Paul Sartre: 'L'enfer ... c'est les autos.'
Re disturbing a film set, I rode into the middle of a scene being shot in Great Budworth a few years back.
The show was 'Our Zoo' and I rode around a corner to be confronted by a flock of penguins, a camel, a crowd of extras in 1920's costume and an irate director.
I worked as a film runner as a lad. On a film shoot for the BBC in Piccadilly Circus (the area had been closed off for the day) as the crew were filming an intimate scene between two leads, I decided to start loading one of the vans parked around the corner and obvioulsy off camera. But the alarm went off. And I couldn't work out how to turn it off. So i panicked and thought the best thing would be to drive off. So I did, with the alarm still blaring. They showed me the rushes later. Two characters in period costume, with bewildered expressions as a silver van, alarm blaring, shoots past in the background. I didn't work for that particular production company again.
A TV company filmed scenes for a drama series in my office building a few years ago. My abiding memory was the lead actor sulking because we didn't have a wifi network available for him to use...
Well, I don't know who's worse, this muppet of a superintendant or the person who thought she was fit to be promoted to that rank. Beggars belief and will go a long way to support a lot of people in the mysoginistic views. Extending her views on maintaining officer safety precludes them from tackling any type of violent crime so if you live in Worcs and a burglar is threatening you, you're on yer own. Tool up appropriately.
West Mercia have backtracked now, and apparently are now doing close pass operation. You'd love to be a fly on the wall eh!
If the H&S rationale is too lengthy for social media then why did you post the damned thing on Twitter.
Has she not heard of links to PDFs, web pages, TwitLonger and lots of other ways of doing links to longer documents.
However, I also want to know who the consultant is they got in to state how dangerous this is? It isn't Georgina Wager is it?
"...Supt Brighton says she is willing to explain in more details via a telephone meeting and won't be publishing a statement....."
If a serving police officer is unable to explain their policy decisions clearly, succinctly and in a logical fashion, perhaps it's time they found another job?
If she proposed some other method of tackling this issue, then her attitude might be acceptable, but merely evading the problem is most definitely not acceptable. I hope someone has contacted the Police and Crime Commissioner for the area, and expressed very forthrightly their indignation and lack of confidence in the Superintendent. It's her job to protect the public, if she doesn't want to do it, them maybe something a bit easier might suit her better.
Surely if the West Mercia police just take responsibility for their own safety and share the road, they'll be fine.
Does anyone here live in Worcester and fancies being a volunteer for the work?
Or if anyone lives in Worcester, you now know that every single close pass you submit will result in prosecution.
Within the Tweet from the Superintendent, the Worcester Bike account has also tweeted out the requirements for Worc County Council when planning the cycle routes asked by the Governement.
No loss of Car Parking Spaces will be accepted.
No Loss of Road Space will be accepted.
So pretty much they are also saying the car is the main thing and eff anything else out there.
Quite shocking really.
I thought that maybe they don't have any officers who can actually ride a bike?! Or maybe all their officers are so unfit, to subject them to some physical exercise would be far too dangerous.
I guess all the bad'uns in Worc will be pleased that the cops there are a push-over. First sign of danger and it's back to the station for cake and kittens.
No, I don't think so.
I think a statement explaining this policy is the only way that she can stop looking quite so stupid as she does right now.
Surely all they need is a helmet, high viz and retro reflectives?
After all, they keep all other cyclists 100% safe.
I do have empathy for her position though, and certainly I agree social media is rubbish for conveying the detail required on this and isnt remotely helped by a free for all piling in on it.
the issue is youve got an independently produced risk assessment thats identified there is potential risk of injury to an officer engaged in this close pass operation, we dont know the extent of the risk or its details, maybe they are specific to the location they wanted to do this than a blanket ban risk, and it sounds like it might have suggested there are other, less risky, ways, to achieve the same goals.
but if you overuled that risk assessment or ignored it, and an officer is then hurt, maybe precisely in the way the risk assessment warned, well youve broken your duty of care to your employee, union lawyers would be all over that risk assessment and thats a slam dunk H&S prosecution that even the cps prosecutors assigned to most cycling cases would struggle to lose.
it might not be the message we want to hear,and it could certainly be communicated in a better way, but i cant see how they get around the risk assessment
But an assessment by someone may not be anything to do with h&s but simply an excuse not to do something. The h&s website has loads of examples of myth busting.
I think this will be the workers' health & safety regulations about how protecting employees from anything that may cause harm in the workplace environment, thats identified by a risk assessment the employer has carried out.
the key part is understanding what the risk assessment actually identifies as the risk, we are just guessing at the moment which probably isnt helping as we feel we accept the risks everytime we ride a bike on the road, but it could be a basic thing like theres no formal police training course on how to ride a bike with this equipment in traffic.
That's all back to front though.
You wouldn't plan an operation without that consideration, so if they had no training why would you announce the operation, then later cancel it? Additionally, I'd expect the operation to be signed off by a couple of people. I can't believe that could happen without a formal risk assessment.
Also other forces manage to put on such operations, so there seems no reason why this force can't.
Aside from all the others risks accepted as being part of the job of an officer.
(As a side note, had a ridiculous close pass on the way home).
She hasn't cancelled opclosepass for that location, she has cancelled it full stop as per her tweet.
And I don't see what specific extra risk she sees that isn't present for any other law enforcement the Police take. Yes, there is a chance that her officers could be knocked off their bike when taking the operation. But there is also a chance the Police Motorcyclist could be knocked off their bike or the Police Car could crash. Yet you still see them out and about enforcing the law. Or don't they hold out much hope that the Police HiViz would make the cyclists visible and safer?
Pages