It’s not unknown to any cycling fan by this point that the once world-beating squad of Ineos Grenadiers has been some way off the top in the last few years, failing to win a Grand Tour since Egan Bernal took the pink jersey at the Giro d’Italia in 2021.
With one of the team’s stars Tom Pidcock leaving on not-so-amicable terms to join Q36.5 Pro Cycling last month, it only looks like things will get more difficult before they get better for the British team — and the team’s new personnel, with Scott Drawer in his second year as the Performance Director, along with Zak Dempster and Kurt Arvesen coming in as directeur sportifs to replace the outgoing Steve Cummings, are not afraid to accept that.
> "Dysfunctional clown show": Cycling fans react to Tom Pidcock's departure and accuse Ineos Grenadiers of "complete lack of ambition" and "monumental" decline
Speaking to Cyclingnews, Arvesen said: “We need to come back and win bike races, start to win stages. Every race counts. It might take one, two, three or four years before we’re back, winning a Grand Tour, but I'm convinced we’re going to be.
“There are only three Grand Tours, there’s only only three winners, so it’s very difficult.”
But there’s still concern about team owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s commitment to funding the team — the British billionaire of course has another arguably more lucrative ‘sinking ship’ project to focus on in Manchester United with Portuguese manager Ruben Amorim at the helm.
Despite Ineos Grenadiers’ CEO John Allert confirming the team will exist until the 2028 UCI WorldTour and praising the owners for being “very passionate about this sport”, he confirmed the team was in fact, seeking out a second title sponsor.
“It’s fair to say that Ineos don’t want to spend more money,” Allert said. “So it depends entirely on what happens with this commercial activity. They very clearly do want us to be a super team and they know what it takes to be a super team. I'm not going to put a number on that, but it’s a number that's greater than what we're currently spending.
“You don’t need to be that clued-up to realise there’s a reason why we’re trying to bring other people on that journey with us. There’s value to be created for other brands and we don’t necessarily feel we have to, need to, or want to, go it alone.
“I’ve heard some bonkers rumours in the last couple of weeks about people buying us or investing in us or whatever else.
“We certainly have a commercial strategy that is an evolution of our strategy. We’ve appointed an agency and we're looking at commercial partnership opportunities, like most other teams are.
“It’s a very crowded market. We haven't signed anybody. I'm not aware of us imminently signing anybody.”
> “Team Circus continues”: Tom Pidcock dropped by Ineos due to risk of bonus payout claims Brian Smith, who says there’s “no fun in numbers-driven cycling anymore” as “gagged” Steve Cummings confirms exit
Drawer also spoke about the rapid pace at which the sport is changing, from the rise of Tadej Pogačar and other young riders to the growth of the big-budget super teams, and even new performance science such as the ability to ingest more carbohydrates during races and so race longer and harder.
He said: “Some of the most critical things that have probably shaped why we’ve reshaped ourselves are based on the changes that have really happened in the sport.
“I think the trends in racing, particularly pre and post-COVID have changed the nature of the type of cyclists that are now in the peloton. So we've restructured ourselves and set ourselves up to get ahead of that slightly for this year and for the future.
“Our motivation in our approach to racing is going to be very different, and then there will be a bigger investment in talent.
“It’s probably one that we've got behind the curve on, but one that we're really accelerating to get ahead of the curveball.
“You’ve heard some news, and there'll be a lot more news coming out around our importance in that space.”
Add new comment
61 comments
Everyone needs to taake care on shared paths. They aren't suitable for fast riding. I'm a jogger and cyclist and also a dog owner (no I don't use a long lead). I see this from different perspectives. On shared paths that are busy with cyclists I keep my dog on a short lead. When cycling along them, I go slowly and keep my wits about me.
I don't have a bell on my bike but the brake blocks came off one of my BMXs and make a shrieking noise, no matter how you adjust them. Just a touch of the back brake is sufficient to let anyone know I'm there, and this also avoids the pro and against arguments for bicycle bells.
So there's the answer, squeaky brakes.
Shared paths are the shrug-your-shoulders copout of transport infrastructure. No use to pedestrians, no use to cyclists. But great for drivers who don't have their precious road space impinged upon.
But squeaky brakes, and a freehub that sounds like a million angry hornets, are part of the solution
Amen! Although some of the ones I'm fortunate enough to live near allow me to travel for several miles in a few directions and are almost always faster than the roads (just due to having to wait e.g. a minute at traffic lights - get stopped by a few and this really adds up).
I'm conscious that's simply because they're mostly under-used though. Plus they're "wide" as these things go in the UK - so much so, the council is actively planning to reclaim them for "tram" * so as not to "cause disruption". AKA inconvenience drivers and have to deal with utilities, compensation etc. as happened with the last round of "tram" (at least in part due to sheer incompetence) (* Actually their plan better fits "light rail transit" as they don't go along the "main streets" or in fact near anyone wants to go for much of the route).
I always ring my bell when passing pedestrians on shared paths, although if they're busy then I tend to avoid them in favour of the road.
Most people are fine with it, and I always give a friendly wave and a thanks if people need to move or grab their dogs to allow me to pass. Sometimes people ignore me and then jump when I pass them. Sometimes people ignore me and then scowl or make some comment when I pass, you get dickheads everywhere.
Once or twice I've had dog walkers shout at me for not slowing down, even though I have slowed down and passed very carefully. These tend to be the people who decide that the place they want to stop and have a chat is on one of the main cycle routes through Southampton common and that it's perfectly fine to have their dozen dogs running around off leads on a shared path.
The only time I've really been given proper abuse was from a blind man. I rang my bell from a good distance so I was sure he knew I was there and passed with a lot of space. But he didn't like it and was very angry.
There are only problems when people misunderstood what the bell means. It isn't a demand. It's an alert. I'm going to be passing you and I'd rather you didn't suddenly change direction and step in front of me.
Voice is far more useful and flexible than a bell.
If you want to be polite (e.g. shared paths), then you can use a "excuse me please", "morning", "afternoon" etc. If there's a ped in the "wrong" place, then a spoken "beep beep" might be appropriate (alternatives such as "ding ding" are good too).
If a ped is about to step right into your way, then a shouted "Oi!" is really effective.
Meanwhile bells seldom get the wanted result and often annoy the peds.
This is what happens:
or the classic:
To be fair, most peds (and horse riders) are fine if you say "hi" or "OK if I pass?" (usually preceded by a very British "sorry") & then pass & say thanks as you go. As others have said though, there's dickheads everywhere.
This has generally been my experience. I presume that "fond farewell" is a euphemism?
In my experience, this has sometimes sounded like "you facking want some?" on a particular popular path near me.
That's why saying "ding ding" is better than using an actual bell
I'm trying to adopt a wider range of utterances for close passes etc. - "Hello sailor!" or "Saucy!" - I shall add this.
Ah, like a sort of sonic skeuomorph? Like when they were searching for the sound to add back in to electric cars to cue people there was a car there - perhaps they should have used "broom broom!".
Or is it for the confusion factor - like Gaspode the Wonder Dog in the Discworld series? "Woof, growl".
I sometimes go for "Beep Beep!" if the peds are wandering onto a non-shared bike lane - I think a car noise is better for sounding slightly miffed.
Bells vs voice vs nothing - depends on the scenario.
- If I can pass very wide of a pedestrian, then nothing.
- If I can pass but it's narrower, bell from a distance, then slow down and use my voice when closer.
- If path is blocked, then bell, bell again and voice + a thank you.
This is my general approach, but my brakes are squeaky, so often slowing down is what makes them notice my existence. IMO if using a bell you should ensure you are using a bell at an appropriate distance so it gives pedestrians a bit of notice, but the downside is of course they might not hear you from further away, so I will repeat the ding if they show no obvious signs of having heard me and continue to block my route.
The article is over the top in terms of 'four more ...' etc, but I I don't take it personally that someone wants the less considerate cyclists to be more considerate - because I too want the less considerate cyclists to be more considerate. I hope that some pedestrians will be educated into realising that the use of a bell is a sign of consideration, not arrogance, but I'm fairly sure most complaints about bell use are mainly just complaints about cyclists existing.
If there is room to get past easily, there's no need to ring a bell, but I might slow down a bit depending on how much space there is, and how steady they look in their chosen path. We can look out for pinch points, and assess whether someone is likely to move into our path. If slowing down a bit makes it easier to have a clear over-take - I'll do it.
I'm less of a fan of shouting out, except as a last resort, because unless you are bellowing, a normal voice doesn't carry as far as a bell, and if it's a busy path and people are chatting or listening to a podcast, will they recognise that you are trying to get their attention? I also worry that 'on your right' could be confused with 'move to your right', but each situation needs to be judged on its own merits, and how confident you are that your voice can carry the necessary informatoin without sounding like you are shouting at them.
Of course most of these interactions could be avoided if people didn't walk or stop for a chat in the middle of a busy path. There are plenty of pedestrians that are annoying to other pedestrians, and I think it boils down to some people being utterly lacking in an awareness of how their actions impact on others. They are so caught up in their own point of view, and I'm sure are the ones most likely to think that the use of a bell is aggressive, because it doesn't occur to them that they are in the way.
The Graun has gone full anti-cyclist this year - their circulation must be down.
Dont give the fuckers airtime.
Tbf it's the weird bastard-child Graun Australia, not the UK version.
(Hence them saying bells are a legal requirement.)
Generally quite discombobulating when the Graun UK website picks up the Oz articles until it becomes clear, not just on cycling but all topics.
Here in the UK it's something weird like "illegal to sell a bike without a bell, but you can take it off the moment you've handed over your cash", isn't it?
Likewise pedal reflectors can be removed, unless the bike is used at night. You do have pedal reflectors fitted, don't you?
Yes - I'm a flat pedal user, so plenty of space
Are there any good quality flat pedals for commuting that have reflectors? They always seem to be on cheap, disposable plastic pedals. Not something longer lasting and serviceable.
MKS Lamda/Gamma come with reflectors and a big platform. You may not like like the look. I have Gammas on one bike and really like them for "normal shoes". Seems they have a newer, "more stylish" version called the Pretzl too (expensive). I think some of the Wellgo "MG" magnesium pedals have reflectors as standard too. They are quite light and the ones I own have lasted a long time.
I've got a pair of Look Geo City Grip pedals which I find very comfortable.
Shimano Saints, but the reflectors are sold separately at £14, the ingeniouity of the fixing is almost worth the cost.
A lot of Wellgos have fixings for standard reflectors.
No
Are you one of those people with a posh bike that doesn't come with pedals?
😉
Very shiny feet? Ankles like the nose of the Dong? (Perhaps chafed from labouring over the Hills of the Chankly Bore?)
I got to read the war poets a school. 🤔
Pages