When it comes to local newspaper reports on active travel infrastructure, I’m not sure there’s a headline more commonly used than the tried and trusted ‘This cycle lane has ruined EVERYTHING!’ trope.
It works for almost anything you could ever imagine a bike lane affecting: Businesses, seafront views, mile-long commutes, and – my personal favourite – Christmas (It’s always those pesky cycle lanes ruining Christmas for the kids!).
> "Christmas is ruined," claims business owner... who blames cycle lane for "massive negative impact" on trade
So, this morning, we were treated to a classic of the genre in the New Forest village of Dibden Purlieu, where a collection of angry residents – complete with disgruntled group photo for the front page of the local rag – told the Southern Daily Echo that a new bike path has “ruined” the area and made things more dangerous for drivers and pedestrians.
Earlier this year, a new cycle lane and pedestrian crossing was installed by Hampshire County Council on the village’s Beaulieu Road.
However, some residents claim the nine months of work led to gridlock and local businesses “losing huge profits”. And since it’s been finished, they say the bike path is not clearly marked on either side of the road, failing to delineate between the cycling and pedestrian areas, and that the new crossing has been placed between three busy junctions and a petrol station, leading to a number of near misses.
“Hampshire County Council have ruined the village with all these unclear cycle markings,” Dibden Purlieu resident Janice Chalmers told the newspaper.
“When the school kicks out the children take up all the path and cyclists have nearly taken them off their feet.”
“We have seen accidents happen due to the number of junctions, the position of the traffic light, and the cycle lane markings,” noted fellow resident Steph Osborne.
“It’s like the council just threw it all together – prior to that we had a traffic island and that worked really well.”
Meanwhile, local councillor Malcolm Wade added: “I have been a county councillor since 2013 and prior to that a district councillor since 1991 – in all those years I have never had so many complaints as I have about this cycle lane.
“So many people have written to me with their complaints. I have to agree with them: the scheme was poorly planned and badly executed resulting in us being left with a number of issues.”
And “keen cyclist” John Laurence, a member of the Waterside Action Cycling Group, has claimed that “one of our members is so worried of the dangers across this stretch of road he gets off and walks his bike through the area”.
“This scheme has absolutely made it more dangerous for both drivers and pedestrians – our group did make recommendations to HCC before, during and after their consultation,” he said.
> "A bike lane doesn't close a village": Dame Sarah Storey defends cycle lane blamed for "ruining business" and "killing village", calls shops closing "a coincidence, not an unexpected consequence"
Responding to the claims that the cycle lane has ruined everything, a spokesperson for Hampshire County Council said: “The local cycling group and residents have been actively involved throughout the implementation of the cycle lane to ensure the route meets the needs of all users.
“The Beaulieu Road section is part of the Eling to Holbury cycle route improvement scheme. On completion, the entire route will be subject to a post-completion review and monitored to identify any areas where additional improvements may be needed.”
Add new comment
34 comments
So the cycle lane ruined the village, because of the unclear markings and accidents are happening because of the cycle lane markings. Which is it? They're unclear or they're causing accidents?
"It is difficult for drivers to see cyclists in the dark if their headlights are faulty" says Dan Brothwell.
He was very restrained and could have easily added "if they are using their mobile phone, slurping their shit takeway milky coffee-style beverage or chomping on a Greggs breakfast", as so many drivers seem happy to do while on the move.
And that's before we consider other common issues such as deficient eyesight, tinted, frozen or misted-up windscreen, illegal or under-inflated tyres and drug/alcohol in a driver's bloodstream.
Cars ruin villages, not cycle lanes.
No, cars also ruin cycle lanes.
Um, no round up of the weekend racing?
I looked at the Echo site, and that picture on the header of the Dibden Purlieu story really is the cycle lane in DP… A pretty standard - if not wider than normal, TBH - cycle lane, separated from the footway by a solid white line.
I bet these people were all previously complaining about cyclists on the roadway…
A "keen cyclist" you say? Saying that the "scheme has absolutely made it more dangerous for both drivers and pedestrians"?
He'll be handing his Sidis, lycra and hi-vis back in, I hope?
Oh no no no. He's not one of the lycra clad ones you see
sadly in invernerss, an influx of diversity has introduced unregistered dirtbikes being used on roads, pavements and the canal towpaths - along with private e-scooters and EUC.
what enforcement or prosecutions have there been? answers on a postcard.
"an influx of diversity" - care to expand on that?
I think they mean people from *shudder* Aberdeen.
what once was mostly homogenous is now more hetrogenous. duh.
Should there be a new element of the driving practical test involving following a sat-nav that has been purposefully setup to give wrong/dangerous directions to see how drivers respond...?
It wouldn't be possible on public roads, but could be done on a private (DVLA) track.
Or it could be done on a simulator.
Anyone not driving safely by ignoring the wrong/dangerous instructions given should fail.
"Sat-nav companies make changes after fatal crash"
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1dp40kpvzdo
Appeal after cyclist assaulted with vehicle...
https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2024/october/...
That's got to be the crapest police report ever. Its blindingly obvious that plod has zero expectation of it going anywhere. "The car was a white saloon. Swerved towards a cyclist. He fell and hurt his wrist. Didn't need hospital. Please help us."
The cost to the tax payer of that report was probably in the thousands.
Weird take on it. IMO the wording is as you would expect for an appeal.
What I thought was quite interesting, is the fact it's being treated as an assault, rather than a driving offence.
Don't think he means the police appeal but the original report. It's part of the standard troll pattern to denigrate anything that concerns cyclists - even if, as in this case, it's an attempted vehicular assault - as "that's nothing, why did you even report it?" Tiresome.
My buddy Rendel. Wide of the mark as always and high on childish insults. I thought you had to log off your mums computer at tea time?
Dear me.
Guardian - More than 50 people have UK driving licences with at least 30 points on them
Also "10,056 drivers hold a valid licence despite having at least 12 points".
That article calls for a review of the definition of exceptional hardship. I don't think that is necessary.
What is necessary is to stop projecting the problem of the hardship onto the wider public. If ineligibility to drive creates such an exceptional hardship, there are standards to which the driver must adhere in order to avoid the hardship being invoked. And that's that.
Yeah... public feeling doesn't normally run to "but we understand they felt they had to steal - they'd got a persistent smack habit / a sick pet / kids with expensive cello lessons to pay for - and they only pinched from Waitrose so it's not really hurting anyone" *.
Perhaps, like expensive whisky - the premium comes from telling a better story?
* OTOH the trope of the hard-done-to / daring / cunning everyman sticking one up at authority / the rich is perennially popular ...
I'm curious to know which motor insurers are accepting those drivers and what the premiums are.
And if some of those drivers aren't able to get insured (ie it is too expensive) with that many points but still cotinue to drive...
Insurance premiums would depend on the specific circumstances, but I found this list of average quotes for drivers with various Drink Driving convictions.
The average car insurance quote is apparently £861, so a drink driver could be paying as much as 5x that.
Not sure if it's still the case but I recall that back in the day some people would get around "mucky" licences by having their partner or spouse take out insurance on a vehicle with an "any driver" policy, i.e. anyone with a valid licence could drive it, usually third party only. Such policies would sometimes have stipulations about the age of other drivers (usually over 21) and how long they had held a licence but not number of points.
“Someone went with inches rather than centimetres”
Easy mistake to make.
That puts things into perspective. Too much f*****g perspective.
Just needs a bit more Dobbly.
None more black!
For the benefit of the youngsters (it still makes me laugh) https://youtu.be/zg5Ovdu6bOE?si=xEwEADOUWzaPRuB1
Pages