- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Kyle Walsh - via Northumbria PoliceMotorist who nearly hit cyclist then claimed he wasn’t driving jailed thanks to rider’s video
A motorist who nearly hit a cyclist then claimed to police that he had not been driving the vehicle has been jailed thanks to video footage taken by the rider.
Police discovered that the person Kyle Walsh said was behind the wheel during the incident in Sunderland on 19 April 2019 could not possibly have been driving it at the time – because he was on remand in prison at the time.
Newcastle Crown Court heard that the cyclist was riding on Suffolk Street in the Hendon area of the city when a VW Passat went past him at high speed on the wrong side of the road.
When he reviewed the rear-facing camera footage afterwards, he saw the vehicle weaving in and out of traffic, with the driver almost causing a crash.
He submitted the footage to Northumbria Police, who have posted it to Facebook here, and who identified Walsh as being one of the named drivers on the policy under which the vehicle was insured.
They sent the 33-year-old a fixed penalty notice, but he returned it claiming that an associate of his had been driving – despite that individual being on remand when the incident happened.
Reviewing the footage, police identified Walsh as being the person at the wheel, and interviewed him under caution.
On Monday, he was jailed for six months at Newcastle Crown Court after being convicted of dangerous driving and perverting the course of justice. He was also banned from driving for 12 months, beginning with the date he is released from prison.
Chief Inspector Mick Hall from Northumbria Police’s Motor Patrols Department said the case highlighted the importance of submitting dashcam and other video evidence to the police.
“This footage speaks for itself,” he said. “The driving on display was appalling and it is by luck, not judgement, that nobody was injured.
“Walsh was travelling at high speeds and into oncoming traffic on what was a minor road in an area where there is a high number of pedestrians.
“But when he was reported for his offences, he refused to take responsibility and tried to squirm his way out of a criminal prosecution.
“Ultimately his lies have seen him put behind bars and that would not have been possible without the cyclist in this case submitting his head-cam footage.
“His vigilance has taken a dangerous driver off the roads and, if that driver had not been stopped, then it could have been a matter of time before someone was seriously injured or killed.
“If you have a head-cam or dash-cam, and capture dangerous or reckless driving, then please send that footage to us,” he added. “This case shows we will take action.”
As we reported last week, the National Police Chiefs’ Council has urged police forces throughout England & Wales to adopt seven principles relating to how they process video footage submitted by members of the public, with the aim of achieving consistency across forces, underlining the role that such footage can play in reducing road danger.
Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Latest Comments
- Jimthebikeguy.com 1 hour 36 min ago
Try and get rid of the negative associations around carbon and pressfit. Carbon frames are no more troublesome than metal, and pressfit is no more...
- r32hoo 5 hours 56 min ago
The first generation CHPT3 items made in concert with Castelli were fantastic quality, and when purchased on sale were a reasonable investment. I...
- David9694 9 hours 5 min ago
Theres not one scrap of self-help among drivers is there, it's always someone else's issue.
- Simon E 9 hours 53 min ago
Oh dear. A single bike in a single size in one shop is not indicative of the entire UK market for bicycles. And the slump isn't just bikes, it's...
- hawkinspeter 12 hours 45 min ago
Ridiculed or is it just jealousy?
- Rendel Harris 13 hours 11 min ago
Thank goodness for that. I don't suppose anyone would want you to. You certainly behave like one though.
- Eton Rifle 13 hours 19 min ago
You do see some utterly ridiculous examples of car use....
- Eton Rifle 13 hours 41 min ago
Exactly. Every road death is a tragedy but this is at the "twat deserved it" end of the spectrum, looking at the state of that car.
- Rendel Harris 13 hours 48 min ago
I'm not the editor of this article, nor indeed of anything on this website. One would have thought that didn't require explaining.
- Eton Rifle 13 hours 49 min ago
I think the answer is in your question. I genuinely didn't know he was married to her. It does kinda explain it. Disappointing, nevertheless.
Add new comment
13 comments
A couple of comments from the Facebook post:
David Chow
Can drivers submit footage to prosecute cyclist's that think they own the roads.
Oh we can't because, they have no reg to identify them.
and the reply:
Northumbria Police
Hi David, can you tell us how many drivers were killed in a collision with a cyclist in the last five years? We'll answer for you, it was zero. Irresponsible cycling puts the cyclist at risk, not the driver. It doesn't make it okay, but we focus on our resource in the areas that are most likely to cause serious injury or death. It's the person behind the wheel, not the one behind the handle bars, that can cause the greater harm.
Hmm, not entirely convinced that will actually stop him driving...
and, given that it was the fact of his name on the insurance which led the police to him, I'm guessing he won't make that mistake again.
Agreed, that is why I believe we should treat a driving ban like a suspended sentence, if you are caught driving whle banned you should automatically be jailed for the original ban duration (not the remainder), even if it is the day before the ban runs out
Good; six months ought to be enough to make him think twice about his behaviour, but yet again, a relatively short ban. I'm guessing the prison sentence was entirely for perverting the cause of justice, and that the ban is for dangerous driving, but if the driving was that bad, surely the ban should be much longer? Couple of years at least.
Indeed so: “Ultimately his lies have seen him put behind bars..."
Yup. Its a little realised fact that judges view perverting the course of justice of very very dimly and it almost always carries some time in the Big House as a result. Lying about who was driving is one of the most common, usually to avoid points.
Cough-cough Chris Huhne, Fiona Onasanya - you'd think MPs would know these things...
I'd like to see a longer ban too but unfortunately he doesn't seem like the type to stop driving just because he's banned.
Quite - although at least we don't know for a fact that the person will breach the ban. I always enjoy the stories of the people who do something dangerous, whilst driving whilst banned and driving without insurance and their punishment... a ban... it's like seriously WTF - the individual is in front of you in part because they've demonstrated they don't give a flying fig about a driving ban but some idiot says - "hmmmm yes, a driving ban will teach them" - at times it is bafflingly stupid!
"...Bafflingly stupid"? No, not really as the Court has to follow the sentencing guidelines which stipulate a custodial sentence and an additional disqualification in all but the most minor of cases. See www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Drive-whilst-disqualifie...
That doesn't make it not "bafflingly stupid"
It just means the stupidity is on the part of central government (setting the guidelines) not the court implementing them...
I don't wish to appear to be a pedant but the Sentencing Council's is an independent body and not "Central Government". In fact it would be "bafflingly stupid" to allow those who defy their disqualificaiton to return to the roads when the ban they've ignored expires. The problem is, as ever, austerity's impact on road Policing and the low priorty that the of the enforcement of traffic laws now endures.