Transport secretary Grant Shapps has backtracked on the pledge he made in May to make roads safer for people on bike and on foot by providing £225 million in emergency active travel funding to councils across England, claiming that “far too many” temporary cycle lanes are being left “unused” causing motor traffic to be “backed up.”
The emergency funding was supposed to encourage people returning to their jobs following lockdown to walk or cycle to their workplaces due to reduced capacity on public transport, while avoiding the traffic congestion that would ensue if those with access to a car switched to driving instead.
The Sunday Telegraph reports that the Conservative minister wrote to council leaders on Friday saying that he was “not prepared to tolerate” poorly designed facilities, and that “No one should be in doubt about our support for motorists.”
Despite Prime Minister Boris Johnson promising the dawn of a “new golden age for cycling” earlier this year, a number of temporary bike lanes in locations including South Gloucestershire and Redhill were removed within days of being installed following complaints from some local residents and businesses.
And as we reported earlier this week, Cyclehoop Car Bike Ports, capable of providing parking for 10 bicycles in the space taken up by one car and ordered by Lincolnshire County Council, have been removed from some towns in Lincolnshire after objections were raised, including by local councils.
At the same time, there has been a concerted campaign against low traffic neighbourhoods aimed at removing rat-running drivers from residential areas, including planters used to block access to roads being moved or even vandalised, with a number of such instances recorded in boroughs across London.
Critics of LTNs have claimed, among other things, that they block residents from accessing their homes – not true, since they are designed to curb through traffic – and that they have led to increased congestion, ignoring the fact that motor traffic levels are higher now than they were before lockdown started.
In his letter, Shapps threatened to give “considerably less” money in the second wave of emergency active travel funding to councils that did not consult properly on their proposed schemes.
He wrote: “I saw or heard from the public and parliamentary colleagues about far too many instances where temporary cycle lanes were unused due to their location and design, while their creation left traffic backed up alongside them; of wide pavements causing unnecessary congestion in town centres; and other issues that many have, rightly, reacted angrily to.”
He continued: “We all want to see the benefits that active travel brings to be realised, but poorly implemented schemes will make no friends for the policy or more broadly for active travel.
“Schemes must balance the needs of cyclists and pedestrians with the needs of other road users, including motorists and local businesses.
“I want to be absolutely clear,” he added. “We are not prepared to tolerate hastily introduced schemes, which will create sweeping changes to communities, without consultation, and ones where the benefits to cycling and walking do not outweigh the dis-benefits for other road users.”
Meanwhile, there is still no word on when further Fix Your Bike vouchers will be available to the public.
In May, Shapps announced that 500,000 vouchers worth £50 each would be made available to people in England to enable them to get neglected bikes – and themselves – back on the road.
There was a lot of interest in the scheme even before the first wave of 50,000 vouchers were released but those are all that have been made available to date.
Many bike shops and retailers participating in the scheme have spoken of significant delays in being reimbursed for the vouchers, if they have been paid at all, and that there regular servicing and repair workload has been delayed while people wait for the next batch of vouchers to be released.
Add new comment
26 comments
What an arsewipe.
Several factors come together: most people will never cycle unless they're forced to. They will have numerous excuses, about messing up their hair, or being sweaty, or shopping, or having to take children a mile to school etc. When it comes down to it, they may claim they would cycle, but never actually will. Even fewer people will cycle when it becomes wet, cold and dark, and that's even before these factors increase the danger. Then when you add in the attitude of the givernment, which is that they encourage cycling as long at it does not inconvenience the sacred motorists, and the attitude of the police which is that close-passing does not exist unless there's a lot of blood on the road, and that cyclists are 'more trouble than they're worth', and the present worsening situation is inevitable. It can only be improved by by a serious pro-cycling stance by the government and police and CPS and courts, as opposed to punishing the people who continue cycling through rain, shine, dark and frost for the perception that there aren't enough of them to deserve a pro-cycling policy. It's not our fault, honest!
Those fridges and wardrobes don't transport themselves you know.....
Those fridges and wardrobes don't transport themselves you know....
True. When I see vehicles commuting and carrying such items, or transporting several people, I will be happy to defer to them!
Sorry, can't get it right way up
FTFY.
Thanks
Useless government performs another U-turn, except this time it was after initially getting the decision right 🤦🏼♂️
If you make alternative methods of transport more attractive people will drive less... And if you make driving more appealing there will be more traffic.
It is disappointing to see that Schapps is blaming traffic on cycle lanes when the reality is cars cause traffic.
But he has a point about poorly implemented schemes. We have often laughed (despairingly) at crap cycle lanes, and although there has been some good infrastructure installed, a lot has been poorly thought through.
For example, in Greenwich centre the council widened the pavement using plastic barriers in the road, which made it harder to drive and cycle, whilst also preventing pedestrians crossing the road (and somehow managed to spend well over £100k doing so).
Proper consultation is also required for LTNs as otherwise you risk unintended consequences and a lot of local push back, which can undermine the whole scheme (although I appreciate that there will always be some push back).
The trouble is that many LTNs have been created, opportunistically, as a reaction to the unitended consequences of the SatNav. I recently saw, on Facebook, a local village complaining that there had been a recent increase in speeding cars. It coincided with Road Works on a local A road. In the comments nobody pointed out the problem was that drivers were ignoring the diversion signs and just following SatNav.
I live and work in the part of Hertfordshire for which the Schapps is local MP. Welwyn village gets 1 way system and greater, protected space for residents to active travel to the local shops. Shop keepers complain (inc fancy dress store which cited the measures as killer business - nothing to do with Covid stopping parties), council hold firm, Schapps intercedes and tells council to remove measures - measures removed. The man is an utter cock-wobble.
“We are not prepared to tolerate hastily introduced schemes,......"
Wow! This from the government which demanded, encouraged and funded hastily introduced schemes. Hypocrisy doesn't cover it any more; what word could possibly sum up the utter clusterf**k that is this government.
Let's go out and spend millions on PPE that doesn't meet UK standards. The very definition of a hasty!
And £12bn on a track and trace system that works in all respects apart from tracking and tracing; the Irish system cost less than a million and it works.
What we need is for the government to make a legally binding commitment to active travel. Oh hang on that wouldn't work either.
Typical weak and wobbly gonvernment. The current government transport advice for a Tier 1 areas is "You should aim to walk or cycle if you can". This is taken from the .gov website and surely that's the message that he should be sending. No wonder nobody cares what they say any more.
We know some people are obsessed with cars and driving. It's not surprising they criticise steps to improve conditions for active travel.
Shapps needed to show some courage, and stick to his guns. Instead, he comes across as spineless.
I'm afraid it's a condition of membership of the tory party that not only must you not have any morals, you must have your spine surgically removed.
Well, who would have guessed.
the emergency funding was supposed to encourage people returning to their jobs following lockdown to walk or cycle to their workplaces
Do they literally expect people to start cycling to work instead of driving? Just how exactly does the world look like from inside the heads of the people that come up with these ideas?
For example from inside my head when I look at a cloud, I see a white fluffy looking thing up in the sky. They must see pokemon or spare parts for a lotus cortina or somethin really fucked up.
Drivers cycling to work, REALLY!?
Not sure if you're trawling or joking. But yes, the idea is that motorists should literally switch to walking or cycling. It's not that complicated.
But it's a fair point. Your typical person is not simply going to throw over a lifetime's custom and habit just because some flip-flopping government wonk they only heard of last week has said so. This will take years of consistent messaging, encouragement and facilitation. Just for starters, so many motorists have to reframe their view of cyclists - scum of the earth - before they could even contemplate joining their ranks. It's almost like asking people to switch religion or vote for the other party!
The point is more they are not going to do it overnight. It will take time for this to happen and it will be a trickle. Which is why it needs more time to make a decision.
Dis-benefits to other road users.
I love the smell of noxious gases in the morning. It's the smell of victory.
in case anyone is counting, I make that at least the 16th article since July that the Telegraph have run that directly criticises the scheme.
Carlton Reid picked up on this earlier in a Forbes article.
The Telegraph article has cherry-picked Shapps' letter to give an anti-cycling bias although, having seen the full letter even Carlton is questioning where Shapps' clear messaging on the shift away from car dependency from earlier in the year has gone.
Ah well...