Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

MailOnline takes aim at cyclists for not using “rollercoaster” bike lane... that is “littered with stones” and “stops and starts all the way along”

Cyclists in Dorset are “brazenly ignoring” the cycle lane according to the tabloid's report, and cycling “in lane dedicated to other traffic”...

Wednesday’s MailOnline provoked another anti-cycling meltdown among its readers after publishing a photo of a single cyclist not using a cycle lane in Wimborne, Dorset. However, several people from the area came forward to describe the cycle lane in question as a "rollercoaster", "bog road", and "guaranteeing a puncture".

In the article, the tabloid news website claims that the cyclist was “caught on camera brazenly ignoring Britain's widest cycling lane as she rides in lane dedicated to other traffic instead”. However, our readers and other cyclists on social media pointed out the various contentious issues with that headline.

Alongside the image of the cyclist riding on the road (perfectly legally), the Mail claimed: “The female biker pedals on the side of the narrow B-road in Wimborne, Dorset, which has been slimmed down to make room for the 11ft 2in wide cycle lane. In order to get around her, a van has to pull into the opposite lane.”

Wimborne resident Jake commented on our live blog yesterday: “I rode down that road recently, and as can be seen in that photo, it's so littered with stones you're almost guaranteed a puncture. Plus as you would expect, the lane stops and starts all the way along the road.”

Jake, who added that he wasn’t sure if the Mail’s photo – despite the article’s claims – was even taken on the B3073 in Wimborne, also told road.cc that new houses are being built in the area and that "there are temporary traffic lights and the cycle lane is closed."

He continued: "Just up from there, rather than a dedicated cycle lane, it is a shared use path. So the cyclist might have opted to ride in the road due to their speed and/or [the presence of] pedestrians.

"When I rode down there the other week I also cycled in the road for a time to avoid all the stones. Although I ended up using the cycle lane as I felt a pressure to do so."

> Sunday Telegraph accused of using divisive rhetoric in “death trap” floating bus stops article

Another Twitter post with a screenshot of the article led to several people labelling the cycle lane as a "rollercoaster" and a "feckin' bog road with bumps and dips, from all the driveway access".

One Twitter user also noted that the bike lane is covered in loose surface and features a driveway every few metres.

A reply noted: “It’s the uneven surface caused by the drives, and the risk of having to deal with motorists pulling out constantly. Fine for a leisure rider, but not for a serious commuter doing 20mph. I wouldn’t use it.”

road.cc user Seventyone corroborated what Jake told us. 

“Incidentally that cycle lane is currently out of use in parts for roadworks," they wrote. "In particular there are quite a few signs placed in it warning road users of roadworks, and in some spectacular irony, a large sign warning that there will be 'cyclists in carriageway' put in the middle of the cycle lane to ensure this is the case.”

Unfortunately however, and perhaps unsurprisingly, the article has played a role in flaring up the latest game of anti-cycling bingo in the Mail's comments section.

Some Daily Mail readers used the story to raise the by-now obligatory complaints about so-called 'road tax', while others called for cyclists to be fined for not using bike lanes.

However, it should be noted that Rule 61 of the revised Highway Code states that “while such facilities [cycle lanes] are provided for reasons of safety, cyclists may exercise their judgement and are not obliged to use them.”

> Why don't cyclists use cycle lanes?

Cycling UK, which was involved in campaigning for this rule, says on its website: “Most cyclists will choose to use good-quality cycle lanes where they exist, but where they are badly designed, littered with glass or badly maintained, they won’t. You are entitled to make you own choice, and the HC rule reflects that.”

In yesterday’s article, the Daily Mail reported that a car salesman, who took the photo, claimed that he sees cyclists ignoring the lane every day.

He said: “When you think of the amount of time and money spent on the cycle lane, you have to laugh that cyclists are not using it.

“I see them ignoring it and going in the car lane every day, I think because they say the cycle lane surface is not good enough. I see the funny side but a lot of motorists are really frustrated, and it is a nightmare when there are roadworks.”

> MailOnline and its readers have meltdown over video of cyclist riding perfectly legally on road

The MailOnline’s furore of cyclists not using the bicycle path also comes after the row around Britain’s “widest” cycle lane on Wimborne’s B3073 road.

Back in 2021 when the route was announced, the tabloid seemingly didn’t take the news well, attacking the 11-feet path as "shambles" with accounts from some locals who objected to it.

> Bike lane meltdown: New road markings prompt Mail to ask, “is there any room left for cars?”

There was more turmoil as the Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole (BCP) Council was awarded a further £247,000 grant from the government to encourage active travel.

“This is great news,” Cllr Mike Green had said regarding the grant. “It will allow us to robustly support our Transforming Travel programme.”

However, locals are not satisfied with the way cycling schemes have been taking shape in Dorset, a situation made clear by the recent furore provoked by the Mail.

Campaign group Shoreham-By-Cycle quoted the original tweet of the cycle lane with: “This is why serious, well-designed, Active Travel England compliant cycle infrastructure benefits everyone – and why shoddy non-standard designs do not.”

Another commenter pinned the blame on the local council for not maintaining the lane properly. Martyn Sheppard wrote: “Perhaps if the cycle lanes were swept/cleaned, more cyclists would use them? (This one is) covered in grit-glass and road debris from what I can see in the picture.”

In the past, MailOnline and its readers have been called out for having a meltdown over video of cyclist riding perfectly legally on road, while also incorrectly suggesting that the unfinished cycleway next to the cyclist cost £150 million – when in fact it was £1.12 million.

Dorset Council, after a week, have replied to us:

"We maintain over 2,500 miles of roads, footways and cycleways, as part of our ongoing programme, and this stretch of cycleway on Wimborne Road is cleaned regularly using our specialist electric sweeper that we have recently invested in."

"In some areas, the existing landscape may result in undulations, such as near driveways, but we have not received complaints about this being an issue on Wimborne Road. We actively encourage anyone with concerns about road, footway or cycleway surfaces to complete our online reporting form(link is external).

"We follow national standards when designing and building cycle lanes to ensure safety and accessibility for all. We're committed to offering a sustainable, inclusive, active travel infrastructure that everyone, from young children to the elderly, feels safe and confident using whether cycling, walking or wheeling. Since implementing our new cycle lanes, the number of people using them for commuting, leisure activities with families, and walking has increased."

Adwitiya joined road.cc in 2023 as a news writer after graduating with a masters in journalism from Cardiff University. His dissertation focused on active travel, which soon threw him into the deep end of covering everything related to the two-wheeled tool, and now cycling is as big a part of his life as guitars and football. He has previously covered local and national politics for Voice Wales, and also likes to writes about science, tech and the environment, if he can find the time. Living right next to the Taff trail in the Welsh capital, you can find him trying to tackle the brutal climbs in the valleys.

Add new comment

33 comments

Avatar
Must ride must ride | 1 year ago
0 likes

That isn't the B3073, this article is fake news. 

Avatar
FrankH | 1 year ago
6 likes
Quote:

...lane dedicated to other traffic...

I'm pretty sure The Mail knows it's a lane dedicated to ALL traffic

Quote:

...a car salesman, who took the photo, claimed "...I see them ignoring it and going in the car lane every day,.."

He's a car saleman so I suppose you might expect some bias but see above, it's not a car lane is it?

Avatar
belugabob replied to FrankH | 1 year ago
1 like
FrankH wrote:
Quote:

...lane dedicated to other traffic...

I'm pretty sure The Mail knows it's a lane dedicated to ALL traffic

Quote:

...a car salesman, who took the photo, claimed "...I see them ignoring it and going in the car lane every day,.."

He's a car saleman so I suppose you might expect some bias but see above, it's not a car lane is it?

If it is, I hope he also moans about motorbikes, vans, buses & lorries that use it...

Avatar
Mungecrundle | 1 year ago
12 likes

Let us not loose sight of the basic fact that the occasional cyclist who chooses not to use a provided cycle lane or other infrastructure for whatever good reason or none at all is doing absolutely nothing illegal or contrary to the interpretation of road traffic laws as published in the official highway code. It really is yelling at clouds territory.

Avatar
Broken_Chain replied to Mungecrundle | 1 year ago
0 likes

Law should be changed so if there is a cycle lane, cyclists must use it.

Avatar
Browsie replied to Broken_Chain | 1 year ago
5 likes

Are you for real!, What even one of the many that aren't fit for purpose such as the particular one under discussion!.

Avatar
NOtotheEU replied to Browsie | 1 year ago
12 likes
Browsie wrote:

Are you for real?.

I don't think they are, which is why most people are simply ignoring the comments.

Avatar
wtjs replied to NOtotheEU | 1 year ago
8 likes

Agreed- a good policy with yet another new (or reincarnated?) nutter.

Avatar
Browsie replied to wtjs | 1 year ago
3 likes

Have to admit I did wonder having read another of their stupid comments on another thread 🤔

Avatar
Samtheeagle replied to Broken_Chain | 1 year ago
6 likes

This cannot be done.  All roads but for M class are free to use on foot, horse back or cycle by right enshrined in Highway Law.  Cycle lanes away from the road are provided because drivers keep killing people choosing to use non-motorised modes (killing people is already against the law).  What we need is drivers to follow this most basic of laws rather than restricting other modes more by excluding them from infrastructure that they paid/pay for. 

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to Broken_Chain | 1 year ago
4 likes

Broken chain?  Broken record.

Avatar
Sredlums replied to Broken_Chain | 1 year ago
3 likes

"Infrastructure should be changed so if there is a cycle lane, cyclists can actually use it."
"Law should be changed so if there is a cycle lane, cars, lorries and taxis must stay the f*ck off it."
Corrected it for you, two times!

Avatar
pockstone | 1 year ago
5 likes

I'll bet that a good portion of that £1.12 million quid was taken up by the frequent dropped kerbs and changes in level, all of which are there to benefit drivers and reinforce the view that cars have some kind of priority when crossing the cycle path.

Avatar
Broken_Chain replied to pockstone | 1 year ago
0 likes

They should have spent the money banning all vehicles from Dorset so it turns into just a cycle lane network.

Avatar
Off the back | 1 year ago
12 likes

Cycling is just another area where the council will introduce a shite piece of infrastructure well below the acceptable standard then expect people to use it without question. 

Avatar
Broken_Chain replied to Off the back | 1 year ago
0 likes

Don't like it? Get yourself a 🚗

Avatar
Sredlums replied to Broken_Chain | 1 year ago
2 likes

Don't like cyclists on 'your' lane? Get yourself a 🚲

Avatar
muhasib | 1 year ago
16 likes

Slightly vested interest there - car salesman criticising bike lanes is like a butcher complaining about the number of vegans.

Avatar
Seventyone | 1 year ago
8 likes

I sound like a broken record but, while there is so much wrong with the daily mail article the most fundamental things is that the photo is not from the Leigh road cycle lane. I'm not sure where it is from but you'd hope the Fail might check those kind of details. I guess it might be from Wimborne somewhere but it seems unlikely as I don't recognise it

Avatar
Seventyone replied to Seventyone | 1 year ago
1 like

All the other photos in the article are of the Leigh road however

Avatar
OnYerBike replied to Seventyone | 1 year ago
3 likes

A bit of amateur, internet-based, sleuthing, but could it be taken outside the Top's nursery here: https://goo.gl/maps/MomcWrpg9AcKsw936

The photo appears to have been taken with quite a long focal length which might make it look quite different to the impression you get in real life. And I note in 2021 as per Streetview the nursery's sign was red, although being updated to green would seem to be in keeping with the nursery's current branding (which appears to have changed from red/pink to green recently). The wave design at least looks very similar, and although illegible the logo looks to be a reasonable visual fit.

The most recent streetview is taken in summer, but if you look back to a winter period, the trees look to be very similar too and are somewhat distinctive.

I also note that the red colour can be added as an overlay, so might have been added recently (which could also explain the poor surface visible in the photo)? 

Avatar
Seventyone replied to OnYerBike | 1 year ago
8 likes

It (the cycleway) definitely not red. I've just been for a run along there. This is the sign I was talking about. It's quite dark but I think the tarmac is pretty clearly not red. Unless that has been added in post production to the original photo?

Avatar
Seventyone replied to Seventyone | 1 year ago
5 likes

Notice the person on a bicycle very sensibly using the pavement to get through this narrow area of roadworks even though there is a green light in his direction

Avatar
Broken_Chain replied to Seventyone | 1 year ago
0 likes

Should be issued a fine unless it is a dual use pavement.

Avatar
belugabob replied to Broken_Chain | 1 year ago
4 likes
Broken_Chain wrote:

Should be issued a fine unless it is a dual use pavement.

Shared use...

Avatar
Awavey replied to Seventyone | 1 year ago
1 like

the weird thing is first time I saw the photo, I actually thought thats exactly what theyd done, photoshopped it red, to highlight the cycle lane, because even the painted cycle logo is a shade of red, and I dont know why a council would have gone to the effort and expense to make that lane red at all.

I think the car dealership is on Wimbourne Road though, so its definitely in that area, and though the Mail clearly havent put much effort into the story other than the headline grabbing part, the implication has to be its linked with the new route the council put in.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Seventyone | 1 year ago
2 likes

Is it that drivers should beware of cyclists in the carriageway, or that the cyclists in the carriageway should beware (presumably of drivers)?

Avatar
eburtthebike | 1 year ago
3 likes

".....Rule 61 (link is external) of the revised Highway Code states that “while such facilities [cycle lanes] are provided for reasons of safety,....."

That would be unusual and many cycle facilities are more dangerous than riding on the road.  The usual reason for providing such cycle facilities is to get cyclists out of the way of the people who think they own the road, the drivers, especially the ones who read the DM.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to eburtthebike | 1 year ago
2 likes

Some are indeed more dangerous. Some may still "feel" safer - which is the metric most people use.

However I suspect it's the usual: current cyclists are already using the road, so it would need to be an upgrade on that for them. Most *people* in the UK aren't cycling any journeys - they're in the cars. For them to change the infra has to both feel very safe AND be convenient. If this cycle path isn't connected to a network of other routes (and they can't park easily and securely at destinations) they're unlikely to be tempted.

(The other side of the equation is that even then they may need a push to get them out of their cars - where driving is convenient, people drive).

Avatar
brooksby | 1 year ago
11 likes

I do hope that the car salesman who took the photo wasn't in the driving seat of his car at the time...

Pages

Latest Comments