Cycling campaign groups and local clubs have claimed that the Verderers’ Court – an elected group of New Forest custodians – are singling out cyclists and acting like supporters of South Africa’s apartheid regime after the court renewed its call for cyclists who stray from the national park’s approved paths to be prosecuted.
The Verderers, a body dating back to the 13th century which carries out similar functions to a magistrates’ court concerning matters related to the New Forest, say that the issue of off-route cyclists has become a "widespread problem”, and have claimed that that people on bikes disturb nature, erode paths and harm nocturnal animals with their lights.
Speaking at a recent session of the court, the Official Verderer, Lord Manners, claimed that there had been more than 700 instances of off-track cycling during the summer, the Telegraph reports.
Manners noted to the group that he was not “anti-cycling”, but nevertheless called on Forestry England, which manages almost half of the New Forest, to take legal action against cyclists deviating from the permitted routes.
Manners’ call for legal action echoes the Verderers’ warning in January 2021 that over 100 miles of the national park’s off-road cycle routes could be axed unless Forestry England “toughens up” on what the court claimed were “out of control” cyclists.
> Threat to axe New Forest’s off-road cycle network as court criticises “out of control” cyclists
Despite Forestry England’s request for an additional three years’ worth of access to the network of waymarked tracks (including bridleways, gravel tracks and fire roads) the Verderers’ Court only provided a 12-month extension, and warned the group that no further extensions will be granted unless it takes steps to stop riders from deviating from the marked paths – or as one court member put it, “gangs of hardcore bikers determined to ride where they please.”
At the recent meeting, Lord Manners renewed the organisation’s demand for a crackdown on trespassing cyclists.
“The Verderers have over many years expressed to Forestry England their concerns over the ever-increasing amount of cyclists who regularly trespass off the approved cycle routes,” he said.
“Headlamps now throw a beam many metres ahead which can be seen far away. These facilitate more night cycling, apparently regardless of the impact on nocturnal animals.”
Arguing that rule-breaking cyclists should be treated by police in the same way as the owners of dogs who harass livestock, Manners continued: “The issue of concern is not that of the cyclist who gets lost or the family who inadvertently strays from the network. The issue is those who persistently flout the bylaw.”
> Conservationists blame "anti-social" cyclists for New Forest damage
However, local cyclists have pointed out that there is no evidence that cyclists harm nature more than any other group of visitors to the New Forest, and say that the Verderers are simply exhibiting “antagonism” and “prejudice” towards people on bikes.
“Cyclists are often treated very badly,” says David Orme, the chairman of Christchurch Bicycle Club. “In the forest, there is one rule for horse riders and a completely different rule for cyclists. All the prejudice against cyclists is not taking into account the actual evidence. It’s built-in bias.
“They should focus on cars, littering, fly-tipping and speeding vehicles instead of picking on cyclists. Cars do all the killing. I’m not aware of any cyclists killing animals.”
Responding to the demands for legal action against cyclists, Orme told the Telegraph: “There’s no need for this antagonism. When the Verderers say they are not anti-cycling, it makes me think of apartheid advocates saying they’re not racist.”
Sophie Gordon, a campaigns officer at Cycling UK, agreed with Orme’s view that the Verderers are singling out cyclists.
“There is no evidence that cycling causes any extra impact on wildlife than other visitors. It’s just a huge disparity. Only five per cent of visitors are cyclists,” says Gordon.
“If there are areas of the forest that need to be kept tranquil and protected, then fair enough, but don’t have a double ban on cyclists, have it restricted for walkers and everyone else too. That seems more reasonable.”
A Forestry England spokesman said: “We recognise that there are some concerns regarding cyclists straying beyond the cycle network and the potential impact on sensitive areas of the Forest. We are working closely with New Forest groups and also those representing cyclists to look at additional ways to address this.”
> "Someone could be killed": Path users blame speeding cyclists for New Forest danger
The Verderers’ criticism of cyclists in the New Forest isn’t the first time this year that people on bikes have come into conflict with custodians and other users of the park.
In January, the New Forest Association (NFA) claimed the national park has been adversely affected by “damaging and illegal activities” and accused off-route cyclists of anti-social behaviour and disturbance of habitats.
The NFA, the second oldest conservation organisation in the world (founded in 1867) and charged with “protecting, conserving and enhancing the flora, fauna and heritage of the New Forest”, said that it had gathered evidence of anti-social behaviour during ‘staycation season’ and highlighted problems with off-route cycling, dog mess and feeding livestock.
In July, walkers and horse riders also complained that they were being put in danger by cyclists riding down steep gravel tracks at high speed at a popular beauty spot in the New Forest. One walker even suggested that “someone could be killed” if cyclists continue to descend the incline rather than dismounting to walk as signs ask.
Add new comment
42 comments
Yep, it's bikes that are the problem all right
"Four ponies died after being hit by vehicles on the same road in the space of 11 days, campaigners have said.
In one case a mare, seen standing over her foal's body, was killed two days later near the same spot, according to the New Forest Roads Awareness group.
Spokeswoman Gilly Jones said the ponies were all hit at night on a mile-long stretch of the B3054 near Pilley between 25 August and 4 September.
She urged authorities to install average speed cameras on the road."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-66727911
All cyclists should also remember that the much-needed changes to Ipley Crossroads where two cyclists were killed in the last decade were delayed time and again by the Verderers. They play the "bUt NatUre" card only when it suits them and happily ignore the impact of livestock and the vehicles used in their management.
One of the local action groups is the Game & Wildlife Trust who attempt to hide their true purpose (shooting animals for fun) behind conservation schemes which provide cover in themselves for predator control. For example, they fund a waders conservation scheme which allows them to remove habitat for common raptors and foxes on shooting estates. Of course those raptors and foxes also take the game they've bred so that rich wankers can compensate for their limited virility with shotguns.
Ultimately, the New Forest is a National Park and yet the Verderers seem to think it belongs to them. It's partly a generational thing as the grey old men in charge remember when it wasn't a National Park - there was in fact a huge campaign against it being awarded NP status, because it eroded their ability to rule it like some feudal fiefdom. It's 90 years since the mass trespass on Kinder Scout, perhaps it's time for another one here. It's the only one of the NPs so vehemently anti-cyclist, despite it bringing a huge amount of money into the local economy. There are 5 or 6 thriving local bike shops and bike hire companies, and UKCE are based here too.
'Like some feudal fiefdom' - you wouldn't be referring to the fact that Lord Manners' father was also previously the official Verderer!
Be grateful that other agencies like Forestry England and New Forest District Council are comprised of grown-ups and have some accountability other than to themselves. There's something of the cabbie, the market trader about commoning - a lot of huffing and puffing about something where you wonder whether it turns a profit.
The Court's petty obsessions, encroachments from the C21st, range from cycling through campsites, camper vans, placement of ice cream vans, dogs (agree with them on this one) and so on.
The slight good news is that their anti-cycling ramblings get a pretty strong reaction in the comments in the normally low-key Lymington Times & New Milton Advertiser. But I think this attitude links to the driver resentment of the New Forest sportives, the nonsense with the the tacks.
The monthly Court of Verderers minutes usually contain the last animal road death numbers, but no-one seems to bat an eyelid about that - however see the below extract, bottom of the page.
The main road across the Forest is an obvious candidate for average speed cameras, but that seems stuck in the doldrums - it doesn't make sense as drivers are always telling me how lucrative these are. Of course it's locals: you can't blame visitors for animal deaths in November. I just wonder where all the boshed-in cars end up when it's a hit & run.
If we must suffer the Court of Verderers to exist at all, let them focus solely on the core business of managing the livestock on the forest, the countless donkeys that are neither use nor ornament, of which as kil0ran has said they're doing a grand job.
This story (or the behaviour of those in this story) does seem like a sketch from somewhere between Morecombe and Wise and the Goon Show.
The Verderers assert they have evidence about people on bikes, and CUK assert that there is no differential evidence about people on bikes vs everyone else they can think of as triangulation.
Then up pops Mr Faceplant and asserts that he and his friends are like victims of the Sharpeville Massacre.
We clearly need a Judge-lead enquiry! Or the Ghost of Desmond Tutu speaking via a Ouija board.
Perhaps one ignored need in the New Forest is birds and small mammals. What do the various SSIs actually say?
Up here in North Notts, the main serious cycling problem we get in our local woodlands, such as they are, tends to be teenage or tweenage MTBers digging big holes in woodland footpaths to make jumps (I have only seen that twice), but we still get people wheelie-ing their way down back, and sometime classified, roads. That one will perhaps go in abeyance when one gets awarded a Darwin and it is all over the local papers.
But we also have a very good range of ex-mining railway shale trails and Sherwood Pines plus Clumber Park with their facilities, which is very poplar. Plus the Peak District.
Has anyone in the New Forest cycling community suggested what they think they actually need?
The Verderers sound like an absolute bunch of cycle-hating old gits, frankly, but the apartheid comparison simply shouldn't be made. If we object to being called "cycle Nazis" for riding legally we should not sink to that level ourselves, totally undermines the perfectly valid points being put forward.
Fundamentally the analogy fails because the New Forest aren't treating cyclists as sub-human, just annoying, like hoodied youths or living statues.
It's interesting to consider though, with that thought, how it might apply to the 1% of motorists who actively hate cyclists and deem them worthy of being attacked and intimidated on sight without consideration as to their worth as human beings.
Aren't we the cycling taliban this month?
I thought we were ANTIFA (anti fast automobiles)
(keeping US theme) CNN - cycle nazis network.
Either people have no idea of the power of words, or...
https://bikebiz.com/bbcs-cyclists-are-nazis-guest-apologises-only-to-jew...
https://observer.com/2013/06/citi-bike-a-nazi-muslim-plot-to-create-a-dr...
Totally. In fact, any comparisons to apartheid, slavery, colonisation, genocide and the like really need to think of how extreme all of these events were and whether that comparison is even close to proportionate.
The primary damage to the forest is caused by a massive increase in the amount of Commoners stock (horses, cattle, sheep, pigs etc) freely grazing.
There were 7,600 farm animals on the forest in 2011 vs 12,000 in 2021, down from a peak of over 15,000 in 2020. Most of that increase is from cattle which trebled over those ten years. Yep, great hulking cows randomly wandering wherever they want, eating what they want, crapping where they want. Even with the current vogue for mahoosive tyres I somehow think 30kgs of ebike isn't going to do as much damage as 750kg of cow.
Source for stats - the Verderer's own traffic fatality stats. Always good to hoist them with their own petard.
https://www.verderers.org.uk/app/uploads/2022/02/ROADACCS-RATIOS.doc
Interesting to extract from the data that the majority of animal deaths are caused local motorists, and the vast majority are at night. Which would rather let visiting daytime cyclists off the hook.
More hi-vis retroreflective animal tabards needed...
The commoners' livestock goes out in whatever colour nature made it. A field rug like that is only for people's pet ponies.
Presumably they already tag / mark their animals though? They should just slap on a couple of stripes of reflective paint while they're at it (or add it to e.g. the sheep dip).
"Police in Hampshire have reported a significant increase in reports of escaped zebras…"
Really, at least as far as the ponies are concerned. The threat is not from cyclists.
That particular photo is of a a vehicle whose driver killed three donkeys in a single collision.
"....the Official Verderer, Lord Manners,......"
You literally couldn't make it up. If ever there was someone nominatively determined to be an ultra-right wing bicycle hater, it's this guy. Do we have any information about how many of the verderers ride a bike, and how many ride a horse?
It's funny, but we don't seem to have these problems in the Forest of Dean, the only difference being that we don't have verderers. Hmmmm.
Ah, come now, they're a wonderfully representative and diverse bunch
https://www.verderers.org.uk/app/uploads/2019/03/img-5.jpg
Isn't that jury selection from Midsomer?
Nail head hit.
Every time I visit family in Milford on Sea, I keep thinking that I'll see a priest in a smock run across the village green shouting there's been a murder!
So, the reaction to people abusing a limited resource, is to restrict that resource even further - that's reasonable...
Hmm, whatever the merits of their grievance, they'll be on a sticky wicket invoking apartheid.
thank you. They have no idea what it was like, none at all.
I don't know why people keep inisting on drawing comparisons like this.
We know that the hatred that cyclists get is completely dispraportionate to the issues that they cause (especially compared to other types of road users), and we know that cyclists get the short end of stick on the roads a lot of the time, but as soon as you make a stupid comparison like this, you've lost the argument.
Agreed. It's like a variant of Godwins law. The person who sinks there first loses no matter what the merits of their argument.
Being unable to describe discrimination without reaching for apartheid or the Nazis signals a lot of privilege
I agree the comment is crass and unhelpful but the headline on this article is misleading as it is a specific aspect of comments made in defence of apartheid which is being compared rather than apartheid in general
Pages