The Department for Transport (DfT) has announced funding of £32.9 million to help councils across England build a network of active travel experts to help the government realise its ambition of getting more journeys made by cycling or walking, and has pledged to give local communities more of a say in shaping schemes aimed at encouraging more journeys to be made by bike or on foot.
Besides helping fund the creation of hundreds of new jobs throughout the country, the DfT says that the funding will also help councils train existing councillors and staff as well as providing money for network planning and for public engagement exercises such as consultations.
Announcing what it calls Capability Fund, which it says is additional to previously-announced investment in active travel, the DfT puts a strong emphasis on involving local communities in the decision-making process surrounding proposed schemes aimed at encouraging active travel.
It says that “The investment will help local authorities in England design, develop and consult on high-quality active travel schemes that work for residents and consider the local road network.
“These can include new school safety zones to encourage active travel, improved walking and cycling infrastructure on local high streets as well as new cycle and wheelchair paths.”
Training councillors and local authority staff on such schemes, as well as creating up to 1,300 new jobs focused on delivering active travel initiatives and encouraging councils to take into account local factors is likely to be partly motivated by the small but vociferous opposition that efforts to curb motor traffic and encourage people to walk and cycle more often face.
Chris Boardman, National Active Travel Commissioner for England, pointed out that public engagement exercises including consultations typically show strong backing for such initiatives.
“If we want to enable hundreds of thousands more people to walk, wheel and cycle for everyday trips then we need to deliver high-quality schemes that make it feel easy, fun and safe,” he said.
“Of course, ensuring the right technical skills are in place at a local level is vital but so is engagement. Survey after survey has shown strong community support for making space for active travel but it’s vital that people get strong input into helping to decide what is the right solution for their area.”
> Government’s second cycling and walking investment strategy outlines almost £4bn funding for active travel – and aims to double the number of cycling trips by 2025
According to the DfT, safety will be “the major focus for the new designs and routes,” citing research that consistently shows that the biggest barrier to getting more women cycling, for example, is the lack of safe infrastructure for people on bikes.
Jesse Norman, Minister for Decarbonisation and Technology at the DfT, whose portfolio includes active travel, said: “Leaving the car and walking and cycling instead is an easy way to get fit, save money and reduce your carbon footprint.
“Better designed schemes, which take into account the views of local people will help deliver improvements that have widespread local support.
“Skills training and local community engagement will help local authorities to make active travel an attractive choice for getting around.”
Xavier Brice, CEO of Sustrans, said that the sustainable transport charity “is pleased to see this investment in training and community engagement which will ultimately lead to high-quality infrastructure developments across England that help people choose to use their cars less.
“This funding is crucial in ensuring that travelling actively is a safe and accessible option for all, particularly as we work towards the government’s goal of 50 per cent of all journeys in towns and cities being walked or cycled by 2030.
“We’re looking forward to seeing ambitious plans being brought to life and continuing our work to support our local authorities in doing so,” he added.
Add new comment
7 comments
If this money is used to educate councillors and planners about active travel, and it creates a group of people who will promote it and ensure that projects are realised, then it's money well spent. Far too often, plans fail because there is nobody in a position of power pushing them, just us easily ignored outsiders pointing out the benefits. With people inside the machine persuaded and prepared to act, it is much more likely that the vocal, caraholic nay-sayers will be rebuffed.
And if St Chris of Boardman thinks it's a good idea, then I for one, am convinced.
I'm a bit baffled by this. The Capability Fund is definitely not new, because the amounts allocated were published on 1st Feb 2022.
So is this the money actually being paid out now? Or is it a new round of money from the Capability Fund?
I think its this years (ie 2023 or 23/24 FY) capability fund allocation, part of the 2 billion cycling walking package they announced 3 years back now. So its not "new funding", its just Active Travel England have decided to spend it this time to invest on upskilling councils to deliver active travel schemes, rather than getting councils to bid for money on active travel schemes which rarely deliver because they dont have the skills to know what to create.
I'm not sure that's exactly it, but I'll try to find out the details.
I'm looking forward to the article, later in the year, talking about how much of this money was spent on consultants to find out that active travel proposals are not feasible because they would have a minor (but somehow still far too significant to be acceptable) impact to car traffic and are therefore rejected. And how the rest of the money is spent on some paint, some beg-buttons and converting a few pelican crossings to toucans, or better yet designing a whole new crossing design and giving it a stupid name.
What we *need* is to build networks of *proper active travel infra*!
(Meaning separate cycle paths which aren't shared with pedestrians and don't give up at junctions and side streets. )
However maybe this is the only way there from here? Maybe it is just "follow the money" / Big Bung theory?
Is this enough if the politicians / Council leaders are in thrall to motoring? Or we're still subsidising driving? Opportunistic political opposition can easily drum up lots of noise during "engagement" with local people. Or poison the well / scare the horses.
Motivating expertise should at least help reduce crap being built. But engineers will only design and build what they're tasked and funded to do. If they're told to build roads or tasked not to impede motor traffic flow nothing changes. If they're only given a budget for paint and signs infra will be crap.
So this sounds hopeful. The skeptic in me notes that the likes of Bicycledutch / David Hembrow and others have been doing study tours in the Netherlands for over a decade. Plus you can learn "what really works" online.
the skeptic in me notes its 32.9million not being spent on creating actual infra & improvements for active travel, simply the creation of 1300 jobs to talk more about it.