British continental team Saint Piran are suing bike brand Lapierre’s UK representative, Raleigh, after they claim they were sent unsafe equipment with the team looking to recover costs of around £100,000... however in a confusing twist one of the team's sponsors, Tribute Cornish Pale Ale, is currently running a giveaway to win a "professional road bike" from Saint Piran, that the team now insist will definitely not be a Lapierre.
In a story originally published on Cycling Weekly's website, it is said that the team, who are based in Cornwall, told their lawyers to start moving towards reclaiming the money in April of this year, after the team found a new bike brand to replace their 60 Lapierre bikes.
As well as this, Saint Piran's sponsor, Tribute Cornish Pale Ale, is running a competition where the winner will be given one of the team’s bikes (along with three cases of beer, of course). The winner of the competition will not get a Lapierre bike, but, it does show two Saint Piran riders next to bikes from the French-born brand, adding to the minefield of implications the legal battle could bring.
This image is a stock photo from right at the start of the season before the legal issues came about.
The safety concerns are with the headsets on the 2021 Lapierre Aircode DRS and Xelius SL models. However, Raleigh and Lapierre strongly deny that there is anything wrong with the bikes, suggesting that team staff have been over-tightening headsets
In a statement released to road.cc, Saint Piran said: "Following liaison with Raleigh/Lapierre, efforts have were made to achieve a solution to the problems including the replacement of stems and the installation of stem shims - sadly further problems occurred following these alterations.
"Saint Piran, whilst appreciating the efforts that Lapierre/Raleigh made, took the decision to stop their use of the bikes. The team/its sponsor has sourced alternative bikes for the riders and in doing so has incurred costs, well in excess of £100,000 both in purchasing those replacements and in addressing the issues it encountered whilst the bikes were being used.
"There have been suggestions from Raleigh’s representatives that the issues might have arisen through incorrect assembly by St Piran’s mechanics – that is entirely rejected. The team arranged an independent report to assess the likely cause of the issues, which identified causes other than the mechanics assembly of the bikes. That report was shared with Raleigh and is challenged by them. Raleigh have offered a further independent inspection, but that has not yet been progressed."
But a spokesperson of a firm acting for Raleigh said: "An offer was made to use an independent expert. This was not taken up. Now three months later Saint Piran appears to be trying to use the threat of publicity. Raleigh has at all times engaged constructively with Saint Piran to address its concerns and is disappointed with the new approach to resolving their claim.
“Raleigh UK Ltd, on behalf of Lapierre in the UK has previously responded through formal legal correspondence to the claim made by Saint Piran. Raleigh UK Ltd has responded to all allegations made by Saint Piran and disagree with all points made.
“Given that Saint Piran decided to proceed down the legal route, Raleigh UK Ltd will only discuss the matter further through the legal framework outlined. Raleigh UK Ltd will not comment anymore through the media channels on this specific subject.”
Saint Piran are now riding a mix of Specialized S-Works and Trek bikes.
Add new comment
18 comments
Isn't this the same team who almost drove into spectators at ToB and then blamed everyone else but their distracted driver?
I think my own head might also feel a bit looser if I won 3 cases of Tribute, regardless of what bike ends up being a prize.
A few years back, I raced for a team sponsored by a bike manufacturer who supplied us with defective frames. The BB shell had been machined poorly, and either the bottom brackets wouldn't stay in them, or the drive side seat stay would fail on the weld. It was openly a bad batch of frames. Thinking back on it, I'm amazed that the team went along with it, however on reflection, I suspect the whole sponsorship opportunity came about because the manufacturer had a batch of frames they couldn't sell.
My long winded point is that it could be completely feasible that the Lapierre retail bikes are perfectly fine, but the team have been issued with something different and these are defective in some way.
However, the deal was always going to go south, as Richardson was always going to ride his Specialized.
just for the sake of accuracy, Lapierre are Dutch owned, not French.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accell
All made n China anyway...
For the sake of absolute accuracy, the end of your linked piece seems to show they're actually US owned now: "In January 2022, Accell Group agreed to a €1.56 Billion buyout offer led by the US-based firm KKR.".
For absolute absolute accuracy: founded in France, made in the Far East, owned by the Dutch who are owned by the Americans.
What an age in which to live!
Hasn't this exact issue cropped up before? Was it Factor? Or Canyon? There was a pro team having headset failures being blamed on over tightening, but the over tightening was caused by an issue with the headset. Or a particular headset on a particular model...
Found it! It was Factor. Headset passed all internal and UCI checks, but failed.
https://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/product-news/factor-explains-steerer-...
Had a similar issue with another brand this season as those found with the Factor, we just changed out the headset bungs and that worked, the difference was night and day, the manufacture supplied parts didn't grip the inside of the carbon steerer at all, so headsets kept coming loose
Can't wait to see how this one unfolds, I read in the CW that the issue was found in November 2021, but they were still racing them at the start of the season until they changed to unbranded frames and if rumours in the pro scene are to be listened to, stuck UCI stickers on Chinese frames without them being tested by the UCI...
Richardson however has been on an S-works all year along with his multiple infractions for wearing "non-legal" clothing at races....
Hopefully, it doesn't cause the downfall of a British Conti team but look who they are up against and with seemingly the backing of FDJ and other teams on the Lapierres, I wouldn't like to go up against it.
Can the independant expert be Hambini?
God I hope not. Mans a twat.
While his approach is shocking, his knowledge and independence would be good to see in action here.
Here's Hambini's assessment. Interesting. I just wish there was a button to mute swearing ...
I think he's hit the nail on the head, but didn't quite explain it. Moving the spacers around under the stem and perhaps not replacing the bung with one long enough, means all the load is put onto the steerer above the bearing, which will cause failure.
Surely if what Saint Piran are claiming is true then those models of Lapeirre bikes should be subject to a product recall?
For sure, so you can expect Raleigh/Lapierre to fight this pretty hard.