Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Speeding motorcyclist smashes into cyclist in shocking footage

The video from Colombia shows a motorcyclist race up the inside of an HGV, colliding with a cyclist riding on the hard shoulder

A video doing the rounds on social media shows the shocking moment a motorcyclist speeds up the inside of an HGV in Colombia, smashing into a cyclist riding along the hard shoulder.

Information from the crash scene, believed to be on Sunday, suggests both the cyclist and motorcyclist escaped serious injury, the former was pictured shortly afterwards sat on a wall at the side of the busy road between the capital Bogotá and La Vega.

The bicycle rider had been violently knocked off when the motorcyclist, part of one of the many groups who reportedly travel the route at high speeds, undertook an HGV and collided with the rider using the hard shoulder. The motorcyclist then took out another member of their group who was also uninjured.

Footage from a cyclist passing the scene shortly after shows the motorcyclists' damaged bikes lying further up the road as another group of bikers speeds past.

According to Colombian national newspaper El Tiempo, so far this year 473 people have been killed in traffic incidents in Bogotá — 75 of those cyclists and 200 motorcyclists — and the shocking nature of the video has prompted calls for action on road safety.

One local rider said little is done to stop speeding motorcyclists in the area, to the point where he has stopped riding on the road where the crash happened due to the danger. 

"And next Sunday they will be back, nothing is going to happen," Andrés Felipe Vergar said. "As for me, for years I have reduced my training in this way. A pity as it is a very good place to train, but on several occasions I experienced situations like yesterday [Sunday]."

Dan is the road.cc news editor and joined in 2020 having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for The Non-League Paper. Dan has been at road.cc for four years and mainly writes news and tech articles as well as the occasional feature. He has hopefully kept you entertained on the live blog too.

Never fast enough to take things on the bike too seriously, when he's not working you'll find him exploring the south of England by two wheels at a leisurely weekend pace, or enjoying his favourite Scottish roads when visiting family. Sometimes he'll even load up the bags and ride up the whole way, he's a bit strange like that.

Add new comment

33 comments

Avatar
thrillhousecycling | 1 year ago
0 likes

I'm done with this site. The headline for this article is a dead giveaway that road.cc cares about sensation and "shock value" in the pursuit of site traffic opposed to instituting change or actually helping these people. It's exploitative and opportunistic.  

Has road.cc every donated profits towards initiatives for safer roads, infrastructure, etc? What is actually getting done with this vertical of content? I'd love if they were making good use of the revenue they're surely generating by PLASTERING every page with ads, but can't imagine they are. 
 

 

Avatar
wtjs replied to thrillhousecycling | 1 year ago
5 likes

Wow, that's a really short fuse! One post and can tolerate the site no longer. We'll cope

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to wtjs | 1 year ago
2 likes

Like a rare species of frog or a white dwarf going supernova, we first learned they existed at the moment they no longer did.

I didn't even have time to say that you can get rid of (most) of the adds by subscribing...

Avatar
andystow replied to thrillhousecycling | 1 year ago
8 likes

I clicked on the headline, "Speeding motorcyclist smashes into cyclist in shocking footage" and what I found was an article built around a video containing shocking footage of a speeding motorcyclist smashing into a cyclist. I feel so misled.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to thrillhousecycling | 1 year ago
4 likes
thrillhousecycling wrote:

What is actually getting done with this vertical of content? 

I'd love to tell you but I have literally no idea what this means. Anyway, welcome and cheerio and thanks for taking the trouble to inform everyone that you've arrived and left, super.

Avatar
thrillhousecycling replied to Rendel Harris | 1 year ago
0 likes

I mean what good is this content doing? Road.cc posts this kind of content all the time, but seems to literally do nothing to help mitigate/solve the problems its reporting on. 

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to thrillhousecycling | 1 year ago
1 like
thrillhousecycling wrote:

I mean what good is this content doing? Road.cc posts this kind of content all the time, but seems to literally do nothing to help mitigate/solve the problems its reporting on. 

Yeah, I know right?

I was reading about the weather on BBC and then thought "what are the BBC doing to fix the weather?". I mean what are we even paying them for?

Avatar
perce replied to thrillhousecycling | 1 year ago
2 likes

Vertical of content? I quite like that. What does it mean?

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to perce | 1 year ago
3 likes

It's like a quantum of sausage but more concrete.  And not as tasty.

Avatar
perce replied to chrisonabike | 1 year ago
1 like

Ah. it makes sense now. Thanks

Avatar
thrillhousecycling replied to perce | 1 year ago
1 like

Content verticals = internal language for different genres of content on a web property or site (re: the review vertical; the professional racing vertical; etc etc). Writers for the publication will know what it means. 

Avatar
perce replied to thrillhousecycling | 1 year ago
0 likes

Oh.

Avatar
TheBillder replied to thrillhousecycling | 1 year ago
3 likes
thrillhousecycling wrote:

Content verticals = internal language for different genres of content on a web property or site (re: the review vertical; the professional racing vertical; etc etc). Writers for the publication will know what it means. 

I think I might have discontent horizontals.

Avatar
thrillhousecycling replied to thrillhousecycling | 1 year ago
1 like

Yep, I signed up specifically to call out this garbage, sensationalist content. 

Avatar
thrillhousecycling replied to thrillhousecycling | 1 year ago
2 likes

Whatever dudes. Enjoy your weird and sensationalist "car hits cyclist" porn instead of actually getting involved and doing something at a grass roots or political level. 

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to thrillhousecycling | 1 year ago
2 likes

You appear to have confused road.cc (a news / interest site, with a side helping of "asking the odd awkward question of police, politicians, not-very-pro- or anti-cycling folks") with one of these worthy organisations:

https://www.roadpeace.org/

https://www.cyclinguk.org/ (e.g. Cyclists defence fund etc.)

https://www.cycling-embassy.org.uk/ (a bit dormant ATM I belive)

(insert your local cycling organisation here)

You also appear to have confused "people who post on the internet" with "people who only post on the internet".  Which is understandable.

Anyway I'm off to recycle myself as an odd-looking orca with dubious wands, must do one's bit.  It's been a blast!

Avatar
thrillhousecycling replied to chrisonabike | 1 year ago
0 likes

I have no idea what you're talking about or trying to contribute. 

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to thrillhousecycling | 1 year ago
1 like
thrillhousecycling wrote:

Whatever dudes. Enjoy your weird and sensationalist "car hits cyclist" porn instead of actually getting involved and doing something at a grass roots or political level. 

Hold on a minute - this is porn? Boy have I been grabbing the wrong end of the stick

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to thrillhousecycling | 1 year ago
1 like

Wait - don't go!

So you've been triggered by "clickbait" on this site?  You've created an account specifically to apply some sweeping generalisations and have a dig at folks in the comments?

By your own definition you're exactly the person we need!

Alternatively - if seeing the bad thing here has triggered you to get off the internet and get (more?) involved in cycle campaigning (I assume?) I am delighted.  Good luck!  Also - good work inspiring activists, road.cc!

Avatar
thrillhousecycling replied to thrillhousecycling | 1 year ago
1 like

Videos of people getting hit by cars for clicks. I mean come on people, it's the TMZ of cycling. 

Be better! Or just be horrific leaches within the hellscape we all inhabit! Good riddance to this site. 

Avatar
NOtotheEU replied to thrillhousecycling | 1 year ago
2 likes
thrillhousecycling wrote:

. . . . within the hellscape we all inhabit! . . . . 

You must commute in Birmingham too, I feel your pain.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to NOtotheEU | 1 year ago
1 like

I think it was that slalom cycle path that did it.  Although it's "Leithers", not "leaches".

Avatar
cyclisto | 1 year ago
0 likes

I don't know what is the legal framework over there, but I see many of the things that a motorway has like central island with 2 lanes per direction, no at grade junctions, emergency lane and distance from urban areas. I wouldn't ride there because drivers would be easily expected to reach 100km/h or even more, and in many countries it would simply be illegal.

Of course the motorbikers were a pack of morons, but this is the exact place where morons like to be. Be smart and try to avoid morons, especially if you are going to ride for recreation thus being able to select your route.

Avatar
Car Delenda Est | 1 year ago
1 like

Extremely lucky nobody went under the truck.

Modal separation would have prevented this.

Avatar
ChrisB200SX replied to Car Delenda Est | 1 year ago
7 likes
Car Delenda Est wrote:

Extremely lucky nobody went under the truck. Modal separation would have prevented this.

I'm not sure giving Motorcyclists their own infrstructure will stop some of them riding like complete dangerous bellends.

Avatar
Car Delenda Est replied to ChrisB200SX | 1 year ago
1 like

Of course not, but they won't be endangering anyone but themselves.

Afterall if everyone thought like that it would result in cyclists being denied basic infrastructure because some of us ride on the pavement and through red lights... Oh wait

Avatar
Capt Sisko replied to Car Delenda Est | 1 year ago
6 likes
Car Delenda Est wrote:

.. separation would have prevented this.

Err no. If the motorcyclist had followed the basic rules of the road it would have prevented this.

Avatar
Car Delenda Est replied to Capt Sisko | 1 year ago
1 like

Well duh..

You can add that to the list of things that will only happen in a perfect world, in the mean time we need changes that have been proven to make a difference in the real world (see: Dutch infrastructure.)

Avatar
ubercurmudgeon | 1 year ago
10 likes

How can this be blamed on the cyclist? Hogging the lane? No. Wearing dark clothing? Nada. Not wearing a helmet? Nope. This is frustrating, there must be something. People who burn fuel, or discharge batteries, in order to travel are just axiomatically more advanced, more adult, and thus cannot be expected to look out for those who childishly use their own muscle power to get around. Hold on, the motorbikers are in full leathers, with knee and elbow pads. So why should "holier than thou" cyclists get to use our public roads without such protection. For their safety (and also to make me feel better that I risk injuring or killing someone every time I put the ignition key in my vehicle) they should be made compulsory.

Avatar
brooksby | 1 year ago
2 likes

Busy day for the insurance companies...

Pages

Latest Comments