At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
This. ...
Surely a complaint to Ofcom is needed here? If most of a programme supposedly about e-bikes, with e-bikes in the title, isn't actually about e...
Genuine question, possibly something road.cc could look into: how do the costs of using public transport (buses, tube, hire bikes) compare with the...
And just like that…
If cyclists should have the same requirements as cars, then shouldn't cars have same requirements as HGVs......
We haven't got much of this sort of thing round here, but there are square small granite cobbles (as in the main picture) making up the speed bumps...
Interesting.... and a bit out of touch. ...
On an aside, I am left wondering if it is ever at all possible to have the words 'right wing' and 'hypocrite' not co-joined,...
101 hours? Peanuts. Drivers in Chicago, America's "Windy City,'' racked up 155 hours in 2022: https://i-290blueline.com/chicago-commuters-lost-more...
There's a big difference between 54/11 and 56/10. Just sayin'.