Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

review

Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon

8
£1,000.00

VERDICT:

8
10
Really impressive road bike that's built around a corker of a frameset, and the price is very good too
Weight: 
9,130g

At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works. Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.

What the road.cc scores mean

Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.

  • Exceptional
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Quite good
  • Average
  • Not so good
  • Poor
  • Bad
  • Appalling

The Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon is a quick and dynamic road bike with practical features that make it suitable for year-round riding, and it offers very good value for money.

  • Pros: Great frame, solid spec, very good price
  • Cons: Brakes aren't the best

Blimey, what a corker! The Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon replaces the Road Team Carbon which is road.cc Road Bike of the Year 2017-18, and it's a lot of bike for £1,000.

> Find your nearest dealer here

> Buy this online here

Every so often in this job you review a bike that makes you think, 'I'd happily ride this one day in, day out.' That's not entirely surprising when you're on a 10 grand superbike, but it's less common at the £1,000 mark. The Boardman SLR 8.9 is one of those bikes.

boardman_slr_8.9_carbon_-_riding_4.jpg

Of course, £1,000 represents a significant investment for most of us, but it's not stratospheric these days, and means the Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon is accessible via most tax-free Cycle to Work schemes.

The highlight is the new frameset, which is good news because that's the heart of any bike. The frame was developed with the use of CFD (computational fluid dynamics), the idea being to provide improved aerodynamic efficiency. You wouldn't call this a full-on aero road bike but you do get features designed to reduce drag. The down tube, seat tube and fork legs have truncated aerofoil profiles, meaning that the trailing edge is cut off square – a design technique that's widely used in the bike industry (and elsewhere).

boardman_slr_8.9_carbon_-_down_tube.jpg

The ride

We can't offer any assessment of aerodynamics, but I can tell you that the Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon feels lively in use. You'll find lighter bikes out there at this price point – the £999 Giant Contend SL1 that we reviewed weighed 8.74kg, for instance, and the Specialized Allez Elite, also £999, was 8.77kg – but don't get too hung up on that.

The SLR 8.9 Carbon offers a high level of stiffness for its price point. Okay, you'll probably notice a bit of frame flex if you absolutely hammer it in a quad-twanging sprint for a town sign, and a little from Boardman's own alloy tubeless-ready wheels, but that's about the extent of it. In general, the SLR 8.9 Carbon gives a good account of itself, standing firm when you launch into your best KOM efforts.

boardman_slr_8.9_carbon_-_riding_3.jpg

You get a tapered head tube that's home to a 1 1/8in upper bearing and a 1 1/2in lower bearing. This gives the front end a pretty solid feel that makes carving through the bends a whole lot of fun. You can smash it through the corners without the need to back off if things get vague.

boardman_slr_8.9_carbon_-_head_tube_badge.jpg

The handling is quick but a way short of twitchy. You can manoeuvre yourself easily enough without any sense of skittishness. This is a bike that's simple to control – well, pretty much. I wouldn't say that the Tektro R315 long arm brakes, which have been specced to allow the use of mudguards and 28mm tyres, have quite the punch of Shimano equivalents. Don't get me wrong, they work fine, they just feel like they're lacking a little power when push comes to shove.

boardman_slr_8.9_carbon_-_rear_brake.jpg

One thing that surprised me about the SLR 8.9 Carbon is the level of comfort on offer here. I've ridden it loads over the past few weeks, including up the Col de la Madone in southeast France two or three times and the Col de Turini, and I've never given comfort a whole lot of thought. That's definitely a good thing because the only time I usually think about that ride quality is when it's missing.

boardman_slr_8.9_carbon_-_riding_2.jpg

Boardman has dropped the seatstays on this model so that they meet the seat tube low down, while the seatpost is a slim 27.2mm in diameter and its clamping point is low – it's a wedge-type design in the top tube/seat tube junction.

boardman_slr_8.9_carbon_-_seat_post_bolt.jpg

All of this helps to make for a reasonable amount of movement at the saddle; not so much that you bounce around when laying down the power, but enough to take the edge off holes and bumps in the road and to filter out a lot of vibration.

boardman_slr_8.9_carbon_-_seat_tube_junction.jpg

The saddle itself is made for Boardman by Velo, although the shape is reminiscent of that of a Fizik. Let's just say that the design looks as though it has been heavily influenced by the Antares. Saddles are always a matter of personal taste but I imagine that most people are going to get along with the generous amount of gel-feel padding on offer.

boardman_slr_8.9_carbon_-_saddle.jpg

The only thing that I'd really have preferred in terms of comfort would have been a larger diameter handlebar. Boardman's own alloy bar is a 31.8mm diameter at the clamp but slims down a lot from there. A chunkier bar would make for lower pressure on your hands... but that's a personal preference and I'm being picky.

boardman_slr_8.9_carbon_-_bars_1.jpg

If you want to fit mudguards, the SLR 8.9 Carbon comes with eyelets. The ones on the inside of the rear dropouts are hardly noticeable when not in use and those on the outside of the fork legs aren't a whole lot more conspicuous. Subtle, then, but invaluable for year-round riding in the UK.

boardman_slr_8.9_carbon_-_fork.jpg

Geometry

I've been riding the SLR 8.9 Carbon in a 58cm. This one comes with a 570mm effective top tube (the measurement if the top tube was horizontal rather than sloping), a 580mm effective seat tube (again, assuming the top tube was horizontal) and a 160mm head tube. The head angle is 73 degrees and the seat angle is 73.5 degrees. The stack height (the vertical distance from the centre of the bottom bracket to the top of the head tube) is 582mm and the reach (the horizontal distance between those points) is 392mm.

boardman_slr_8.9_carbon.jpg

Divide the stack by the reach and you get 1.48 which is exactly the same as you get with Boardman's high level SLR Endurance 9.9. The geometry is identical. It's not nearly as relaxed as something like a Specialized Roubaix, though, where the 58cm model has a stack/reach figure of 1.67. Boardman's SLR Race, on the other hand, has a lower stack and a longer reach, putting you into a more aggressive riding position.

The top and the bottom of all this number talk is that this is a performance-minded geometry but it's more relaxed than that of a full-on race bike. It splits the difference between a traditional race bike and an endurance bike. You feel like you're riding in an efficient position and the chances are that you're not going to get an ache in your back or a crick in your neck 10 miles down the road from trying to hold it.

Groupset and gearing

The SLR 8.9 Carbon is built up with a Shimano Tiagra groupset, aside from those Tektro R315 long arm brakes that I mentioned. Tiagra might lack the prestige of Shimano's higher level groupsets (it sits fourth in the hierarchy behind Dura-Ace, Ultegra and 105) but it just works. Okay, it's a 10-speed rather than an 11-speed system but you don't particularly notice that difference in use; at least, I don't. You just adjust to these things.

boardman_slr_8.9_carbon_-_drivetrain.jpg

You get a compact chainset (50/34-tooth) and a 12-28t cassette here which will probably suit most. I guess that some people might prefer an 11-32t cassette or even 11-34 to make things easier on the toughest hills. Handily, Boardman has specced the GS version of the Tiagra rear derailleur here so going for larger sprockets would be a relatively straightforward swap.

boardman_slr_8.9_carbon_-_rear_mech.jpg

Wheels and tyres

I wouldn't say that Boardman's SLR alloy wheels are anything to get particularly excited about but they've done a decent job over the past few weeks. After a good few hundred miles the front one is still perfectly true – bang on – while the rear one is near as damn it too. That's a good sign. It means that the wheels probably won't need much attention for a long time.

boardman_slr_8.9_carbon_-_front.jpg

The rims are tubeless ready, although the 700 x 25 Vittoria Rubino tyres aren't, so you'll need to swap them over if you want to go down that route. These tyres aren't especially lightweight or supple but they do offer durability and avoid flats pretty well thanks to a puncture protection layer.

boardman_slr_8.9_carbon_-_tyre.jpg

Good value?

Interestingly, Boardman offers the SLR 8.9 Alloy at exactly the same price: £1,000. The main differences are that you get an alloy frame (you worked that out for yourself, right?) – it's triple butted 6061 aluminium alloy – and a Shimano 105 11-speed groupset, which is a level higher than the SLR 8.9 Carbon's Tiagra. You also get a Fizik Antares saddle rather than Boardman's own.

The tube profiles aren't exactly the same as those of the SLR 8.9 Carbon that I've been riding but the frames are recognisably from the same family. Smooth welding gives a carbon look. I'd guess that most people are going to be tempted by the lure of carbon, but who knows? We've not reviewed the SLR 8.9 Alloy so we can't comment on the relative performance.

> Buyer's Guide: 14 of the best 2018 road bikes for under £1,000

The Giant Contend SL 1 that we did review here on road.cc is similar to the SLR 8.9 Alloy in that you get an alloy frame and a mainly Shimano 105 groupset, although you get a cheaper chainset and Tektro R540 brakes.

The Specialized Allez Elite is also £999, it's also built around an aluminium frame, and it's also built up with a largely Shimano 105 groupset (with a Praxis groupset and Tektro brakes).

You need to decide whether you'd prefer the higher level groupset of any of these three bikes or a carbon frame. That's down to you, clearly. What I would say is that I'd consider the Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon to be more upgradeable. It could certainly handle higher level components if you're likely to add them as and when the various parts wear out.

Conclusion

The Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon is a really good road bike, particularly because the frameset is an absolute winner. Add in a reliable Shimano Tiagra groupset, no-nonsense finishing kit and the ability to fit mudguards easily and this is a bike that'll give you a ton of enjoyment all year round.

Verdict

Really impressive road bike that's built around a corker of a frameset, and the price is very good too

road.cc test report

Make and model: Boardman SLR 8.9 Carbon

Size tested: Large

About the bike

State the frame and fork material and method of construction. List the components used to build up the bike.

Frame Full carbon, C7 grade, endurance geometry

Fork Full carbon blades and steerer, tapered

Headset FSA Orbit C-40 ACB, 1 1/8' - 1.5' Tapered, Integrated.

Bottom bracket Shimano BB72-41b, press fit, Hollowtech II

Chainset Shimano Tiagra 50/34t

Front derailleur Shimano Tiagra, double, braze- on

Rear derailleur Shimano Tiagra, 10 speed, medium cage

Shifters Shimano Tiagra 2x10

Brakes Tektro R315, long arm

Cassette Shimano HG500, 10 speed, 12-28t (12-13-14-15-17-19- 21-23-25-28)

Chain KMC X10

Saddle Boardman Road by Velo, steel rails

Seatpost Boardman Alloy, 27.2 x 350mm

Stem Boardman Alloy, 31.8mm clamp

Handlebar Boardman Alloy, 31.8mm clamp, 70mm reach, 120mm drop

Handlebar tape Boardman Soft-grip

Pedals Toe strap road, 9/16'

Wheels Boardman Alloy Tubeless Ready

Hubs Formula QR

Rims Boardman Tubeless Ready

Tyres Vittoria Rubino, 700x25c, wire bead. Kenda tube, presta valve

Tell us what the bike is for

Here's Boardman's writeup:

The new SLR 8.9 Carbon brings cutting-edge carbon fibre development to an attainable price point offering outstanding performance without breaking the bank.

The SLR 8.9 Carbon uses the same aero tube profiles and geometry as the top of the range SLR 9.8, using our C7 Carbon in the frame and fork. The brand new frame has been designed to combine the fantastic stiffness and ride quality of the old Road Team Carbon with much more aerodynamic tube profiles to give riders an increase in speed for the same effort. Features such as the integrated seat clamp reduce drag further, whilst dropped seat stays and a full carbon fork both help with maintaining comfort. A stiff, oversized PF86 bottom bracket area means that the bike responds instantly when you put the power down. Mudguard mounts and clearance for 28mm tyres add practicality for year round riding or commuting too.

A quality frame needs quality components to compliment it, and we've chosen Shimano's 2 x 10 speed Tiagra groupset, our own tubeless ready wheels and Vittoria Rubino tyres, offering an extremely competitive package that's fast and agile enough to race but comfortable enough for long days in the saddle.

Frame and fork

Overall rating for frame and fork
 
9/10

Tell us about the build quality and finish of the frame and fork?

It's a really high-quality product.

Tell us about the materials used in the frame and fork?

The frame is made from what Boardman calls C7 grade carbon, which isn't as high grade as more expensive models in the range. The fork is full carbon.

Tell us about the geometry of the frame and fork?

I've talked about this in the main body of the review. Essentially, it sits somewhere between a full-on race bike and an endurance bike.

How was the bike in terms of height and reach? How did it compare to other bikes of the same stated size?

About normal.

Riding the bike

Was the bike comfortable to ride? Tell us how you felt about the ride quality.

It was surprisingly comfortable, I found.

Did the bike feel stiff in the right places? Did any part of the bike feel too stiff or too flexible?

It's not the stiffest bike I've ever ridden but you get a good level of stiffness for a bike of this price and you only notice any flex when you're sprinting.

How did the bike transfer power? Did it feel efficient?

Yes, pretty efficient.

Was there any toe-clip overlap with the front wheel? If so

None.

How would you describe the steering? Was it lively Lively but not twitchy.

Tell us some more about the handling. How did the bike feel overall? Did it do particular things well or badly?

This is a bike that's easy to control.

Which components had the most effect (good or bad) on the bike's comfort? would you recommend any changes?

The slim (27.2mm) seatpost can flex a bit and you can swap the 25mm tyres to 28mm if you like. Some might find the saddle a little squishy but I suspect most people will like the gel-like feel and the shape.

Which components had the most effect (good or bad) on the bike's stiffness? would you recommend any changes?

The wheels aren't the stiffest I've ever encountered.

Rate the bike for efficiency of power transfer:
 
8/10
Rate the bike for acceleration:
 
7/10
Rate the bike for sprinting:
 
8/10
Rate the bike for high speed stability:
 
7/10
Rate the bike for cruising speed stability:
 
7/10
Rate the bike for low speed stability:
 
7/10
Rate the bike for flat cornering:
 
8/10
Rate the bike for cornering on descents:
 
8/10
Rate the bike for climbing:
 
7/10

The drivetrain

Rate the drivetrain for performance:
 
8/10
Rate the drivetrain for durability:
 
8/10
Rate the drivetrain for weight:
 
7/10
Rate the drivetrain for value:
 
8/10

Wheels and tyres

Rate the wheels for performance:
 
7/10
Rate the wheels for durability:
 
7/10
Rate the wheels for weight:
 
7/10
Rate the wheels for comfort:
 
7/10
Rate the wheels for value:
 
7/10
Rate the tyres for performance:
 
7/10
Rate the tyres for durability:
 
8/10
Rate the tyres for weight:
 
7/10
Rate the tyres for comfort:
 
7/10
Rate the tyres for value:
 
7/10

Controls

Rate the controls for performance:
 
8/10
Rate the controls for durability:
 
8/10
Rate the controls for weight:
 
7/10
Rate the controls for comfort:
 
8/10
Rate the controls for value:
 
8/10

Your summary

Did you enjoy riding the bike? Yes

Would you consider buying the bike? I would.

Would you recommend the bike to a friend? Yes

Rate the bike overall for performance:
 
8/10
Rate the bike overall for value:
 
8/10

Use this box to explain your overall score

An 8 means 'very good' according to the road.cc score system. This bike puts in a very good performance and it comes at a very good price, especially considering the frameset you're getting here. It's a clear 8.

Overall rating: 8/10

About the tester

Age: 43  Height: 190cm  Weight: 75kg

I usually ride:   My best bike is:

I've been riding for: Over 20 years  I ride: Most days  I would class myself as: Expert

I regularly do the following types of riding: commuting, club rides, sportives, general fitness riding

Mat has been in cycling media since 1996, on titles including BikeRadar, Total Bike, Total Mountain Bike, What Mountain Bike and Mountain Biking UK, and he has been editor of 220 Triathlon and Cycling Plus. Mat has been road.cc technical editor for over a decade, testing bikes, fettling the latest kit, and trying out the most up-to-the-minute clothing. He has won his category in Ironman UK 70.3 and finished on the podium in both marathons he has run. Mat is a Cambridge graduate who did a post-grad in magazine journalism, and he is a winner of the Cycling Media Award for Specialist Online Writer. Now over 50, he's riding road and gravel bikes most days for fun and fitness rather than training for competitions.

Add new comment

17 comments

Avatar
bendertherobot | 6 years ago
0 likes

So, after a few months of living with one. It's very very good. 

It's not without its faults.

The wide rims are hard to get some tyres on (Conti GP4000iiS) and make a 25c blow up to 28c or so. Coupled with a slight misalignment on my drop out it rendered 28's out of the question and 25's tricky to fit with guards. So, you will need either a small 25c tyre or 23c. Guards will then fit.

I tried to remedy this by taking my Mrs Fulrum 7 (non LG version). She has 105 11 speed. I then discovered I couldn't swap her 11 speed cassette to the Boardman wheels because they are, shockingly in this day and age, 10 speed only. So, if I want guards now it'll be SKS brake bracket clip on versions OR sell the 25c tyres and get thinner ones.

My seatpost is fine (others have reported some slipping). 

Apart from that, it's excellent. If you never plan on fitting guards, it's really great.

Avatar
vonhelmet | 6 years ago
1 like

There’s a place for 11-32 and that place is hills with a gradient above 20%.

Avatar
Chez_worldwide | 6 years ago
3 likes

"...the dorky 11-32"

 

..says someone on an internet forum discussing cassette ratios... haha.

Avatar
bendertherobot | 6 years ago
3 likes

Got mine last week. Even left stock it's consigned my Ultegra Supersix with Mavic Exalith wheels to the garage. It really is superb and the ride quality is just lovely.

Issues? Rubbish brakes but that's a relatively cheap upgrade. Wheels are actually pretty decent, tyres are wired but still good, fitting tyres a little harder than typical.

You won't get 28's on with much clearance and you won't get guards on with 28's. 

I Iike it so much I'm thinking of getting one of the bigger brothers to replace my Six.

Avatar
caanbesi | 6 years ago
1 like

I'm keen to see a review of the SLR alloy version. Will a comparison between the alloy and carbon versions been done? 

 

Considering the minimal difference in weight, on the face of it the alloy looks more tempting with the better components. I'm unlikely to make any upgrades so tempted to believe the alloy may serve me better... 

Avatar
StraelGuy | 6 years ago
1 like

Have to agree about the R650 calipers. I replaced Tektro long drops with Swissstop green pads with R650 calipers with Swissstop green pads and the difference was night and day. The Tektros are just too bendy and flexy.

Avatar
kil0ran | 6 years ago
1 like

R650s are great if you need long drops, I don't notice the difference between them and standard 105s.

You've also got Velo Orange Grand Crus to consider, along with TRP RG957s but they're both £100+ options. Good first upgrade though.

Looks like you could even run standard drop brakes at the rear, based on the pad position in the photos. Unfortunately not the case at the front.

Cracking bike for the money, very impressive effort from Boardman.

Avatar
londoncommute | 6 years ago
1 like

Brilliant bike.  I was pondering a carbon frame with proper mudguards for a winter bike a while ago and was surprised how non-existent the options were.  Ribble had stopped making theirs, leaving just the slightly over-priced Dolan Dual.

This must be a great option for people starting cycling as with the guards it can become a great winter bike once they've got the upgrade bug and get a new "best summer" bike.

Avatar
Vejnemojnen | 6 years ago
1 like

Probably have written it like thousand times, but. I approve this 12-28 cassette, as opposed to an MTB ratio.

 

Some ppl just plainly like to have finer increments, which spares some precious energy on 90% of the terrain. Heck, I'd even love a 13-28, rather the dorky 11-32.

 

This looks to be a great value bike, with reasonable specs and good all-day geometry.

Avatar
Prosper0 | 6 years ago
1 like

The frame looks fantastic, great lines. But spongy tektro brakes on a £1k bike is a shame. 

 

I live and hope that someday Road.cc will clean a bike before photoshooting it. 

Avatar
Joe Totale replied to Prosper0 | 6 years ago
1 like
Prosper0 wrote:

The frame looks fantastic, great lines. But spongy tektro brakes on a £1k bike is a shame. 

The trouble is that if you want 28mm tyres and mudguards there just aren't many options available to you for long drop brakes outside of Tektro's. 

Switching the pads to 105 ones is a cheap way of making the braking better but in the long term it could be worth replacing them with these:

http://www.wiggle.co.uk/shimano-r650-dual-pivot-57mm-drop-brake-caliper/

I wish Shimano would make some new long drop caliper brakes but given the move towards disc brakes i severly doubt it will happen.

Avatar
srchar replied to Joe Totale | 6 years ago
1 like
Joe Totale wrote:
Prosper0 wrote:

The frame looks fantastic, great lines. But spongy tektro brakes on a £1k bike is a shame. 

The trouble is that if you want 28mm tyres and mudguards there just aren't many options available to you for long drop brakes outside of Tektro's.

I find standard brakes with offset brake pad holders better than Tektro long drops.

Avatar
maviczap replied to srchar | 6 years ago
0 likes
srchar wrote:
Joe Totale wrote:
Prosper0 wrote:

The frame looks fantastic, great lines. But spongy tektro brakes on a £1k bike is a shame. 

The trouble is that if you want 28mm tyres and mudguards there just aren't many options available to you for long drop brakes outside of Tektro's.

I find standard brakes with offset brake pad holders better than Tektro long drops.

Thanks, never knew these existed, solves a minor issue, without having to resort to deep drop calipers or butchering the calipers for an extra few mm!

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to maviczap | 6 years ago
0 likes
maviczap wrote:
srchar wrote:
Joe Totale wrote:
Prosper0 wrote:

The frame looks fantastic, great lines. But spongy tektro brakes on a £1k bike is a shame. 

The trouble is that if you want 28mm tyres and mudguards there just aren't many options available to you for long drop brakes outside of Tektro's.

I find standard brakes with offset brake pad holders better than Tektro long drops.

Thanks, never knew these existed, solves a minor issue, without having to resort to deep drop calipers or butchering the calipers for an extra few mm!

I can recommend the TRP deep drop calipers, but they're not cheap.

https://road.cc/content/review/115645-trp-rg957-deep-drop-brakes

(Ebay has a new set for £80: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/TRP-RG957-57mm-Black-Brakeset/153142123006?ha... ).

Avatar
Fluffed | 6 years ago
1 like

Brilliant machine for a grand, also comes in red, and a womens cyan.

Avatar
Stef Marazzi | 6 years ago
3 likes

Seems like a hell of a bike for a grand, that would be perfectly at home in a cycle group/club run. That's great to see the deep drop brakes, mudguard mounts and a proper Tiagra Chainset rather than the usual penny pinching "made of cheese" FSA ones. Well done Boardman, you are gonna sell them by the truckload.

Avatar
jlebrech | 6 years ago
1 like

Not £999?? damn Brexit

Latest Comments