Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Car crashes into building - please post your Local news stories

Running this one up the flagpole to see who salutes... 

I just don't remember this being a thing until recently, now it seems a daily occurrence.
Could it be that there are drivers not up to the job, too many cars; should houses be made to ride in single file, shops put on high viz, why are we putting newer buildings in danger like this, it's irresponsible. 
 

https://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/18649201.car-crash-wall-iceland-s...

'A Dorset Police spokesperson said: "Dorset Police was called at 12.48pm on Thursday, August 13, to a report of a collision involving a car and a wall outside Iceland on Poole Road in Bournemouth.

"It is reported that the vehicle was also in collision with a pedestrian, but they did not require medical treatment." ' 

 

If you're new please join in and if you have questions pop them below and the forum regulars will answer as best we can.

Add new comment

2862 comments

Avatar
Hirsute replied to peted76 | 3 years ago
0 likes

hard to understand that one

street view - https://goo.gl/maps/Y3dacXmp31ZjVGy87

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism replied to Hirsute | 3 years ago
1 like

Well doesn't that mean his solicitor lied in court when he stated:-

" his client had been left devastated by the crash and shown remorse throughout the investigation."

After all he would have known about the arrest for driving whilst unlicensed and uninsured before he made that statement on his behalf. Maybe one of the resident legal eagles can confirm that.

I also think that the judge should review and if the mitigation had been used to give such a pitiful sentence, then it is removed from consideration. 

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism replied to David9694 | 3 years ago
1 like

"Newest First" does work for me on ordering correctly, but "Threaded" doesn't thread properly and shows Munges post from 1 month ago as the latest. 

I think it broke somewhere around the 200 comments. 

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism replied to David9694 | 3 years ago
3 likes

Surprisingly pretty much all the comments are about it being dangerouse MGIF's causing all the problems and not an inanimate piece of asphalt. 

As for the driver in the main report. Probably just coincidental that she is blaming the road and the easily distracted scenery and it is her car which is the one on the wrong side of the road with the other car appearing to have been forced well off the road on its correct side of travel.

Avatar
wtjs replied to David9694 | 3 years ago
2 likes

Get in the sea

Somehow these submerged cars are not as entertaining when it's not a BMW driver whose premiums just went up.

Avatar
David9694 replied to Simon E | 3 years ago
0 likes

Also noticed some weak at the knees stufff here. Beats me why the council took on the disabled driver lobby. what a shame.

https://www.shropshirestar.com/news/local-hubs/shrewsbury/2021/08/20/shr...

Avatar
andystow replied to Hirsute | 3 years ago
0 likes

hirsute wrote:

https://www.gazette-news.co.uk/news/19531969.driver-avoids-jail-falsely-...

Hits lampost

"Bhaskaran has six previous convictions for 17 offences including matters of dangerous driving and drink driving, for which he was given a community order with unpaid work and a 28 month disqualification

He was ordered to carry out 60 hours of unpaid work and complete a 30-day rehabilitation activity requirement."

That'll show him.

Another gentle caress on the wrist.

Avatar
David9694 replied to hawkinspeter | 3 years ago
1 like

Also look here https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/coroners

"There is no definitive list of conclusions available to a Coroner. The following are those most commonly used:

  • natural causes (including fatal medical conditions);
  • accident or misadventure;
  • industrial disease;
  • dependence on drugs/non-dependent abuse of drugs;
  • attempted/self-induced abortion;
  • disasters subject to public inquiry;
  • lawful killing (such as deaths caused during acts of war, or self-defence);
  • unlawful killing;
  • suicide;
  • open verdict (where there is insufficient evidence for any other verdict).

The commencement of the provisions in the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 have added some further possible conclusions to this list:

alcohol/drug related death, and
road traffic collision.

The conclusion of unlawful killing is restricted to the criminal offences of murder, manslaughter (including corporate manslaughter), and infanticide. Cases where driving causes death may, therefore, only be regarded as unlawful killing for inquest purposes if they satisfy the ingredients for manslaughter (gross negligence manslaughter) or where a vehicle is used as a weapon of assault and deliberately driven at a person who dies (murder or manslaughter depending on the intent)." (my emphasis)

It strikes me that the test for manslaughter is met and that Unlawful Killing would therefore be the right coroner's verdict. The article doesn't say what the conclusion actually was - misadventure, I'm wondering? But none of this will bring any of them back. 

Avatar
David9694 replied to ktache | 3 years ago
1 like

I thought no-one cycled in the rain.  Have I been mis-informed?

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to AlsoSomniloquism | 3 years ago
0 likes

AlsoSomniloquism wrote:

Nope, disqualified. The newspaper and eye witness both state  "driver" and we know these incidents happen when the car does it all by themselves.

//i2-prod.somersetlive.co.uk/incoming/article5688626.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/0_Car-traffic-lights-blur.png)

I was surprised to see the use of 'driver' in that article, so maybe some reporters are trying to use appropriate language now.

However, the titles under the images are labelled "A car crashed into a traffic light on Fishponds Road in Bristol" so I think it still counts.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Mark B | 3 years ago
6 likes

Mark B wrote:

“People should know better. If you see a low bridge coming towards you then you don’t progress, do you?”

No, I certainly wouldn't. I'd be running away.

I used to be really scared of a particular bridge, but I've learnt to get over it

Avatar
David9694 replied to brooksby | 3 years ago
2 likes

Are the fresh food shortages so bad that pensioners are ram-raiding Marks?

Avatar
David9694 replied to Sriracha | 3 years ago
0 likes

Turns out they're treating it as a ram raid. Follow-up story here

https://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/19474167.southampton-kfc-bursledon-road...

Avatar
Awavey replied to Hirsute | 3 years ago
1 like

A driver in his 20s, late at night, in a BMW, who ends up with injuries bad enough to keep them in hospital...nope complete mystery that one...Or am I just being cynical  3

Avatar
Mungecrundle replied to AlsoSomniloquism | 3 years ago
3 likes
AlsoSomniloquism wrote:

"Newest First" does work for me on ordering correctly, but "Threaded" doesn't thread properly and shows Munges post from 1 month ago as the latest. 

I think it broke somewhere around the 200 comments. 

Because my comments, on any subject, are; the most important, relevant, witty, erudite and mostly squirrel free.

Avatar
David9694 replied to AlsoSomniloquism | 3 years ago
0 likes

Yes, I thought there was something  confessional about her comments. 

Avatar
Hirsute replied to David9694 | 3 years ago
1 like

No. It is also too cold to cycle and no one can cycle up hills.

Avatar
Sriracha replied to hawkinspeter | 3 years ago
2 likes

Clearly this one did not understand the figurative sense of "go through a red light"

Avatar
David9694 replied to brooksby | 3 years ago
0 likes

Strangely reassuring they went for cigarettes and alcohol.

ram-raiders hit Isle of Grain Co-op

https://www.kentlive.news/news/kent-news/pictures-show-damage-after-ram-...

Avatar
darkstar01uk replied to Mungecrundle | 3 years ago
1 like
Avatar
ktache replied to Hirsute | 3 years ago
0 likes

Wow, accessed by level crossing maybe.

A big determination to get away there.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to andystow | 3 years ago
2 likes

andystow wrote:

FFS, swerving to avoid a squirrel!

Hawkinspeter, anything to say about this?

https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/national-international/car-crashes-in...

I've heard that there's a robust conspiracy theory that Abraham Lincoln was in fact several squirrels disguised as a president. There's a lot of circumstantial evidence to support it including Abraham Lincoln having a high-pitched squeaky voice.

Avatar
Hirsute replied to hawkinspeter | 3 years ago
2 likes

"The driver reported that he’d swerved briefly to avoid a hazard."

So that went well then !

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to hawkinspeter | 3 years ago
2 likes

...and of course there's this infamous photograph

Avatar
brooksby replied to hawkinspeter | 3 years ago
3 likes

Fourscore and... [looks at his pocket watch] seven minutes ago... we, your forefathers, were brought forth upon a most excellent adventure conceived by our new friends, Bill... and Ted. 

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism replied to Mungecrundle | 3 years ago
1 like

At the risk of being controversal, they were all "adults" from the pictures and either were drinking with him or should have been aware he was drunk and / or driving atrociously. Apparently they had been sending snap chat footage from within the car (used to identify where they had been in the car) just before the smash. I doubt the footage would have been them screaming at him to slow down. 

So whilst his driving was awful, and probably would have been unlawful if it was children in the car, I suspect that the coroner was also looking at them choosing to be in the car as well and probably cheering him on.

Although stating all that, on his actual legal comments, you do have to wonder what "truly exceptionally bad" driving is if the crash above is not counted in his mind. 

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism replied to Hirsute | 3 years ago
0 likes

Supposedly it joined from the Station if the person at the station saw it go past. Satellite view shows what looks like the allotments almost a mile further down the track (including just past a bridge the photo above was probably taken from). 

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to hawkinspeter | 3 years ago
2 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

 

"The driver is OK, according to officers and tested for drink/drugs but they said 'accidents happen' and will not be prosecuting the driver," Mr Corbett tweeted.

to my mind anyone that leaves the carriageweay and damages either street furnitiure or a building should be charged with dangerous driving. It's only luck that a person wasn't serriously injured, so how can it not be dangerous.

If a crane drops a load into the street, but it doesn't hit anyone, the HSE are not going to say 'accidents happen'

Looking at the photo and the street view its hard to see how the car could have come from the road into the salon, is this another one of those cases where someone puts the car in forward when it should be in reverse, and then reacts to it not going in the desired direction by applying more power?

Avatar
Hirsute replied to AlsoSomniloquism | 3 years ago
0 likes
Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism replied to wycombewheeler | 3 years ago
2 likes

'accidents happen'

The latest Direct Line Aviva advert is of a young lady who obviously approached a corner too fast for the icy conditions, crashed straight into a pet shop and probably has killed multiple animals plus put added financial burden on the shop owner. But don't worry, we will show a few rabbits bounding around alive, and her smiling because Direct Line sent a truck to take the car away. Accidents Happen. 

Pages

Latest Comments