- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
9 comments
I somehow fail to see how this can be the cyclists problem, it's not like you have some 6th sense to let you know a dog i running wild when you're out riding.
WTF?? They're supposed to keep their f&cking animals under control..... Luckily for the dog, and no thanks to the feckless owner, it didn't end up with a bus tyre track across its back...
"Dig owner..."
Irritating typo which I cannot edit away.
Apparently the "Revision publish date can't be smaller than now". Which unless I am very much mistaken* is a passage from the Bible pressaging the end of days.
*I am almost certainly very much mistaken.
I've seen that bug too - editing or deleting forum posts doesn't currently work.
People with 3 dogs are generally nutters of one type or another, so prone to allow dogs to 'slip collars', despite all 3 being pictured with harnesses. She should have been warned/ prosecuted (Ho! Ho!) for endangering cyclists. This other 3 dog nutter below had all 3 in the front passenger compartment, but the famously deranged Blackpool TacOps Sergeant decided they 'could have been correctly restrained' because such restraining devices (for 1 dog only, of course) exist. That's apart from crossing double white lines in a dangerous position on a humped bridge, which FDBTS also decided was a NaOiL (Not an Offence in Lancashire). Nowadays, I would get straight into a complaint.
To be fair, the owner did have the dog on a lead, though whether it was fit for purpose is debatable.
I'm surprised that the cyclist(s) didn't stop - I would if I'd just hit a dog as usually the owner isn't too far behind (whereas cats deserve what they get and good luck trying to find a cat's owner).
So the dog was running out of control and somehow this is the cyclists' fault?
Yes because they came "whizzing from nowhere"
Let's hope there are no cars or motorbikes on IoW.
Warning dog owners - fit a proper lead.
The 'Island Echo' facebook page has a post about it. From the comments it looks like it happened on a National Cycle Network path and the owner has got a second hand version of events from the bloke who was walking the dogs. So I'd take this story with a large pinch of salt!
https://www.facebook.com/pg/IslandEcho/posts/