A warning that “London could be heading for a new era of gridlock on our roads” has been sounded after a survey found that while one in three people living in the capital say they will cycle more once lockdown ends, the same proportion say they will use a car more.
The poll from the think tank Centre for London also found that two thirds of Londoners back new or wider cycle lanes as the city’s travel habits undergo fundamental changes due to the coronavirus pandemic
The full results of the online survey of 1,068 London residents between 15-19 May conducted by Savanta ComRes can be found here.
Centre for London’s director of strategic planning, Rob Whitehead, summarised the most important findings from the survey on Twitter.
On the think tank’s website, he outlined how travel patterns might change in three separate scenarios – if lockdown were lifted after three months, after six months, or after 12 months.
He wrote: “A third of respondents who offer an opinion say they will cycle more once lockdown is over. Unlike in the case of the tube/rail, buses and taxis, the proportion is the same across the three scenarios (34-36 per cent).
“Meanwhile half (46 per cent) of those surveyed say they think they will be more likely to go for a walk, run or cycle ride in the future, compared to before the crisis. This is particularly marked in inner London (51 per cent).
“In an almost exact mirror of cycling, around a third of those offering an opinion say they will use cars more, again without any real variation by length of lockdown.
“This presents a difficult challenge for TfL and the boroughs,” he said, “as not only do cars contribute to poor air quality and carbon emissions, but they also take up valuable road space needed to accommodate increased cycling and walking.
“This crisis is upending much of what we knew and assumed about Londoners and transport,” Whitehead continued.
“We humans are not good at predicting our future behaviour: just look at how many of us take out gym membership but fail to use the gym.
“However if our poll respondents are even halfway accurately assessing their future transport choices, London is facing an enormous challenge.
“It could be a long time before travelling by the tube or bus becomes part of daily life once more.
“And without bold thinking, London could be heading for a new era of gridlock on our roads,” he warned.
Transport for London as well as boroughs are putting emergency infrastructure in place, with the government having made £250 million available to encourage active travel, £25 million of that funding the bike maintenance voucher scheme, details of which are due to be announced this month.
As we reported yesterday, the remaining £225 million is being awarded in three tranches, and the clock is ticking for local highways authorities to put their bids in, with today being the deadline for applications for the first tranche.
> Time running out for councils on new 'pop-up' cycle lanes
With schools gradually reopening from the start of this week and many non-essential retail businesses set to resume trading a week on Monday, active travel campaigners are acutely aware that the window to bring about meaningful change in the way we move around our cities is limited.
Last month. Simon Munk, infrastructure campaigner at London Cycling Campaign, told road.cc: “Let’s be clear, the cars are coming back every day – and likely will come back more after 1 June.
> London 'in real trouble' if emergency bike lanes not built soon (+ gallery of new pop-up lane on Park Lane)
“So this is a race to enable as many people across London to cycle as much as possible, or we face the very real prospect of both overcrowded public transport where social distancing fails and more cars on our streets than we’ve seen in decades – and what comes with them: congestion, inactivity, climate-changing emissions, road danger and high pollution levels, which it is likely exacerbate the spread and mortality rate of Covid-19.
“If we don’t give people a genuine alternative to driving and fast, London is in real trouble,” he added.
The finding that one in three people in London claim they will use bikes more often for their post-lockdown travel is in line with the results of a nationwide survey conducted last month for Cycling UK.
A third of respondents to that poll said they could switch from using cars to cycling or walking when lockdown lifts – with strong support for safe routes, whether off-road or physically separated from motor vehicles.
> One in three people in UK could switch from driving to cycling or walking
Commenting on that survey, Cycling UK’s head of campaigns, Duncan Dollimore, said: “Our poll shows clearly that people are prepared to rethink their travel habits, using their cars less and cycling more, but only if they feel safe to do so.
“The Prime Minister said this should be the golden age for cycling, while the Transport Secretary announced major funding to encourage more people to cycle as an alternative to public transport.
“But encouragement is not enough. If the roads don’t look and feel safe to cycle, only the brave will choose to do so. If there’s space for people to cycle separated from motor vehicles, millions more will do it.
“That’s why we’re calling on local authorities to act now to install pop-up cycle lanes and widen pavements to create the space for people to walk and cycle safely while social distancing,” he added.
Add new comment
19 comments
I can see public transport having major problems even after the lockdown is over - so many people will have gotten out of the 'habit' of using it (including those who've merely discovered they can work from home), plus there'll probably be a residual fear of infection from being too close to strangers that will last for a long time to come. That's going to badly affect the revenues and budgets of train and bus companies and the LU.
If they don't make efforts to get more people on bikes (or walking), the roads will be completely clogged up for a long time after this is over.
I've started a new job, very similar to the old job and same commute. Ride, train, proper off road ride. Popped in on Tuesday to pick up a laptop so I can do the online training and reading, deserted train there, though I was the only one wearing a mask. Out of 4 or 5 people on a 3 carriage service not too bad. Wokingham car park was deserted, never seen the like. Very reduced service and they are all stopping services. Busier on the way back, youths ignoring everything, of course. Saw one other mask wearer.
I have to go in proper next Thursday, and then maybe every day after, one train an hour rather than two, with a bonus one when it got real busy. Looked at the NRE, there is a warning triangle next to the one I need to get, Service Update... likely to be busy, To maintain social distancing, please replan your journey for later in the day.
Very little choice. Hugely reduced service.
I pity the guards, trying to get people to wear masks.
Speaking as a Londoner, I certainly don't plan on using the car any more than in the past, which is not very much.
Luckily, not allof us live in London, however, through the local cycling advocacy group in Derby we have made a couple of dozen recommendations to the local council for easy wins to enable safe cycling away from the few leisure routes that already exist.
Unfortunately, there seems to be a lot of push back from councillors who still believe that driving a vehicle is a neccessity rather than a luxury. Do I expect the majority of our recommendations to happen, not a chance and those that do will be gone at the first protest by motorists, as happened in other local authorities already.
For a relatively small city Derby already has huge problems with congestion. I'm not expecting it to get any better anytime soon.
Deleted, double post.
Similar in Harrogate, we've made suggestions but our Highways Authority is North Yorkshire, who appear determined to do as little as possible.
Having said that traffic isn't back to normal here yet.
social distancing on the tube is pointless. The air swirls all around with every train movement, any "droplets" coming out of people's mouths are not going to sink to the floor inside the magic 2m. Inside the carriages people are not going to "social distance" from the handholds, so they will be bespattered as well. Facemasks to reduce droplets escaping people's mouths in the first place, as they speak, or cough and sneeze, is the only worthwhile measure.
Most people will not cycle when the weather changes. Sitting in wet clothes or changing in some grotty toilet and trying to dry them is only for the very dedicated. Pop up, widened bike lanes are only a small part of the solution. Grants need to be given for work places to provide decent facilities and secure bike storage.
I understand what you're saying but people can adapt, the major thing is feeling safe on the roads. People cycle as normal in bad weather in holland etc, it can be done here if the cycle lanes are expanded and improved
Yes, safety on the roads is No1, for its own sake and for the message it sends seeing permanent decent cycle lanes appearing everywhere. Next you need safe, secure and convenient storage - having your bike stolen, bashed, or needing 10mins to lock every removeable component daily will soon put people off, especially when it's their new £2k ebike. Once those things are in place pressure of numbers will mount on employers to sort the other factors.
i ride my motorbike to work 16 miles away, no matter what the weather. Id do it on the pedal bike too if i felt safe, but the main 60 mph road, no way would i cycle on that at my normal speed, let alone a commuting holland speed.
i ride my motorbike to work 16 miles away, no matter what the weather. Id do it on the pedal bike too if i felt safe, but the main 60 mph road, no way would i cycle on that at my normal speed, let alone a commuting holland speed.
I just read someone saying they'd cycle the 7 miles at the moment but not in a dark wet november.
Also https://road.cc/content/blog/four-big-cycling-challenges-companies-face-...
Personally I'm surprised it's that low unless it's counting people who don't have access to cars. I'll use the car more, I use public transport or the car when I can't get somewhere by bike or need to move lots (yes I know I could get a cargo bike etc.)
Since lockdown started I've not used public transport and most places that I've needed to go are walkable (as they are for most of London). The one set of drives I've done is taking my bike to Hub Velo in Hackney. Normally it would be a stop on my ride to work and then carry on by train, now I'll drive there leave my bike to get fixed and then drive back a couple of days later. Similarly, if we were going as family to meet friends in a park in town that would have been public transport before, now we'll drive. If I was to have major mechanical out riding in the past I'd get the train back if possible, now it will be a phone call to pick me up in the car.
My work is saying walk or cycle to our central London office if you can't do that get a taxi or drive and only in exceptional circumstances use public transport
(edit) Ajax! Dammit!
I wonder whether the latest 'face masks on public transport or a fine' announcement will affect people's choices too?
Also - I thought that there London had the congestion charge? Wasn't the purpose of that to price the
plebshard working Londoners off the road?Plebs by their very nature can't afford thousands to buy a car then thousands per year every year to run a car.
And most Londoners don't drive - the majority of central london traffic comes from outside...where if they are private cars, they should stay. And they should never, ever be given an option to influence traffic planning to force Londoners to inhale their fumes and get knocked down by their dastardly driven cars.
well it makes anyone with an existing respiratory condition into a instant pariah, I cant wear a face mask because I cant breath through them properly,so even though the actual announcement was face masks on public transport,except those that cant wear them, or a fine...who finding themselves in that position is going to use public transport and be forced to constantly defend themselves against accusations they are breaking the rules and should be fined, of course not so you are forced either onto a bike or a car
Good point. Similar to the arguments over people with 'invisible disabilities' using the disabled seats on buses.
And the guards conductors whatever will lose their tolerance to any excuses in this case after a few days of chancers *claiming* they can't wear a mask when what they mean is that they don't want to...