Oooh, that’s clever! + video

In terms of those quirky jeans. Likely to do more harm than good as road users try and decipher what the heck it is that they've seen or looking at.

C'mon same goes for that lazer light field projection. If something's not lit up in an obvious way then there is bound to be a lack of attention on the road from the user as he tries instead to figure out what's being seen.

If that Crank Bros tool was reshaped to make it longer and thinner, it might fit under a saddle.

Any chance of a ruler being shown in the photo shot of the crank brothers tool? The shot with the can in makes it look bigger than it is I suspect. At the moment I'm hoping the longest side of the triangle would be about 6cm....

Looking at the picture it looks like those shorts wrap around to just under the breasts, so no chance of "crackular exposure" (cool term by the way, better than the previous alliterative version). Although I think the halter neck would get sore on long rides.

That Doris is such an exhibitionist too...

The wife only wears bibs any more, which means she only wears full-zip jerseys too. That said, she's ready to give the halters a go, but there is the question of the support disappearing once you're bent over the bars. It seems like it wouldn't be a problem for upright cycling, but it may not be right for a low racing position.

I love my Birzman Velocity RG - http://gateauvelo.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/review-birzman-velocity-rg-160p... - however the Snap-It valve doesn't quite live up to the hype. Have asked Birzman if the new valve can be retrofitted to older pumps. Fingers crossed!

I thought the Crank Bros tool looked okay until I saw the size of it. I don't want that in my jersey pocket ready to gouge a kidney out if I fall off. It seems too big to go across the back of a 'standard' seat bag too. We only need 5-10nm for most fixes so the leverage doesn't have to be great, couldn't the handles be shorter or slot together to make them long enough? It would fit in a small bag then.
Just thought - if the kidney was in good condition that would buy a new Dogma wouldn't it?

I'm no expert on this so I'm happy to be corrected, but in terms of taking the halter off it would surely just be a case of unzipping the jersey and flipping it over your head and letting it drop. It'll be reasonable stretchy material, otherwise how would it go on?

As for the back issue, women would need to roll their shorts down so an extra inch of so of material probably wouldn't make any difference.

I'm probably missing something blindingly obvious though.

multi mount -urgh, I suppose some aren't like me and like a clear set of bars.

love the crankbros tool, that's going on my christmas list

reflective jeans - or just buy normal jeans and a separate removable reflector...don't get it.

I like the valve lock, interested in what that sells for

Halter neck, sounds like a good idea but need some user reviews. I'm in the process of patenting my detachable bib short gusset. 1 long tug and your undercarriage is free to the elements.

Wil someone ever address the problem gentlemen have when going to the loo with bibshorts on? We still have to remove our jerseys or at least shrug them halfway down our arms.

The halter neck is a great idea, but the reason that bibs have a 'back' on them is to avoid crackular exposure. One assumes that the 'torso' part is cut quite high at the back to avoid this, which may itself make it quite tricky to remove for comfort break purposes.

The Garmin mount with LEDs built in though - that's a stroke of absolute genius and I'm an idiot for not thinking of that myself.

And you only have to be a contortionist to get the halter back up inside your jersey. I would've thought it quicker to take the jersey of.

The halter-neck ladies shorts and the all-in-one mount are truly the stuff of "well duh, obviously!" and "why did no-one think of this before?" schools of thinking. Very clever.

(Assuming no ladies post to tell us that the pressure on the neck of the halter-neck will be a, well, pain in the neck.)