Led by Doctor Rachel Aldred of Westminster University, 32 researchers and counting have put their name on an open letter to the government calling for physical activity such as walking an cycling to be allowed to continue.
It says: "As public health and transport researchers we fully support individuals, communities, and governments taking rapid and effective action against the growing pandemic of Covid-19. We recognise the importance of social distancing, with particular need to protect the most vulnerable.
"During this, however, all of our existing social and health risks do not simply go away. As the Chief Medical Officer Professor Chris Whitty has said we need to consider how decisions taken by the government to combat Covid-19 might harm health in other ways.
"At present, walking and cycling make a large contribution to population physical activity. A recent report for Public Health England says “Walking is one of the main contributors to total physical activity across all age groups, contributing between 26-42% of total physical activity, and has been demonstrated to be accessible to large proportions of society in terms of age and gender.”
"In a rapidly escalating situation policy could be adopted that largely confines the general asymptomatic population to their homes, potentially for some time. Confinement, sometimes in overcrowded accommodation with little or no private green space, and particularly during times of anxiety has health risks.
"Physical activity reduces the risk of cardiovascular diseases, several cancers, dementia, and diabetes. These conditions affect millions of people; and some increase the risk of a serious outcome if one contracts Covid-19. Walking and cycling, particularly in greenspace, is good for mental as well as physical health. People should be encouraged to exercise at home, but for most of us it is unlikely that this will replace the walking and cycling we do outdoors.
"Social distancing will make many sports and gym based exercise impossible. However, walking and cycling can be compatible with social distancing, if people are responsible. Transmission risks will be very low if people stay 2-3 metres apart.
"For shopping, and for those who still need to commute, walking and cycling should be supported. We see wide variation across Europe in policies towards walking and cycling, with some countries explicitly encouraging cycling and others effectively banning it; and some closing green space to walkers.
"Thus we call on decision makers to protect the right to walk and cycle safely (from risk of infection and traffic injury) for those who are not symptomatic.
"This should involve ensuring parks and other greenspace are kept or made open (with management if needed to ensure safe behaviour), and emergency infrastructure to make cycling and walking safer for travel to work and shops. Government should publish evidence-based guidance for people walking and cycling on reducing risk, including ensuring social distancing."
Add new comment
22 comments
How about SiS and Ineos do world-leading research on the effect of burning fossil fuels? They will find that they are destroying the climate in which human civilisation developed.
Ok Brailsford never had any moral fibre anyway, and perhaps Geraint Thomas isn't bright enough to understand that his wages are paid by a company that's actively destroying the planet we live on.
But I'm a bit disappointed at road.cc constantly promoting Brailsford's morallly bankrupt sponsors.
Another viewpoint on Ineos: They are a successful company because of the demand for their products. Ultimately, it's consumers (general public) who have made Ineos successful.
I've seen that poster before and I am personally concerned about its providence.
There is nothing on the poster that provides its origins or accuracy.
There is one reference to the WHO, but nothing that says it's from, by or sanctioned by the WHO or any other organisation.
Me likewise. The WHO have a load of posters on their website and I can't see that cycling graphic on there, nor is it in the same graphical style as the other posters: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-f...
The only reference to the WHO is the footnote/citation.
I imagine its been put out there by a "helpful" (?) amateur.
Yes, exactly - it looks like it's the first sentence that is attributed to the WHO, not the entire advice contained on the poster's main body. It would be good to verify the source.
I can't believe they used a traffic light system to indicate activities, don't they know we all ignore those anyway.
I'm still riding to work, except that this week it's been a big circle instead of a straightish line. Been too lazy to cycle home from work though
Brilliant!
I saw this and thought I'd pinch it to post here..
There's plenty of time yet for anarchy.
And our government already have a head start on that one.
"bicycle will be the most important form of transport..."
I'm hoping that if any good comes from all this, it will be that we can recognise that we don't need to drive everywhere or commute in cars to an arbitrary place of work every day.
Also, that there are more important things in life than endless capitalist growth at all costs.
Perhaps if we can make radical changes for a virus, what could we do to help the thousands of people whose lives are cut short by air pollution, obesity and through traffic collisions?
Reports are coming out that pollution has been drastically reduced in China since lockdowns began, agreed it could well be a silver lining in all of this.
Yes, pollution down massively.
However, several colleagues are working from home and they either have rubbish broadband due to inadequate investment or poor/intermittent mobile signal in hilly rural areas. Combine these with rocketing demand for these services plus people clamouring to use cloud software provision then the reality of working from home isn't always the simple solution some people would like to think it is.
I can't do much of my job remotely and I think I'd go mad if I had to work from home every day until further notice. Needed to use the car today but will continue to commute on the bike unless forced to do otherwise.
Edit: I have just seen a tweet about air quality in Los Angeles:
"We never see this kind of air quality in Los Angeles. Ever. This is what happens when people don't drive their cars for just a few days."
https://twitter.com/3daydog/status/1240082604742676481
I liked this tweet: https://twitter.com/StreetsblogUSA/status/1239960689013374976
Surely when everyones finished in The Winchester, and its all blown over, production will ramp up, probably higher than before and increase levels of pollution?
So its just a temporary hiatus....
That's possible but it provides strong evidence that:
1. people can get stuff done without driving everywhere.
2. cycling is a brilliant means of transport with loads of benefits.
3. we all get to sample what a low pollution, low danger, low noise, clean and healthy, more pleasant urban environment is like to experience. Once you've seen it can be a reality (and without the huge drawbacks some people like to imagine) then it will be easier to persuade people that moving in that direction permanently with traffic-free streets, more cycling infrastructure etc are good for everyone.
Riding the roads during the fuel protests was bliss.
As soon as it ended so did the idyll.
This might also prove that you don't actually need to fly for business or holidays quite so much...
(Bloke in the office below mine was shocked when I said me and my family have never had an overseas holiday).
I blame the half-term school ski trips for spreading this around so quickly, anyway...
I'm slightly upset that my Easter ski holiday is cancelled (mainly because my 5 year old was so excited about it), but in the grand scheme of things, it's no big deal, and I certainly won't be getting angry at anyone.
There are two problems with your statement. Firstly it relies on common sense, which most people don't possess in abundance. Secondly, the population of the planet and more importantly their governments, are so invested in capitalism that they'll never let it go, despite the fact that it's designed to shaft 99.99% of them for the benefit of the 0.01%.
I wish too, but I'm not holding my breath.