A Surrey resident has launched a campaign demanding that the county council not run closed-road events such as the RideLondon 100 sportive, which, he says, turns Surrey roads into a “cycle track”.
An online petition, Stop Surrey Being Turned Into a Cycle Track, was launched by Ian Huggins, 68, from Esher four days before the August 3 RideLondon-Surrey 100. Two weeks later it has garnered 826 signatures. In 2011 the population of Surrey was estimated to be 1,135,500.
Mr Higgins’ primary concern appears to be the effect on local businesses, including his own weekend clay pigeon shooting set-up. He also complained that "lycra louts" rode the route in advance of the event, making lots of noise.
He said: “Last year we were confined to barracks for two days and now I have been told I can’t leave my home unless I leave before 5am or after 7pm.
“No one has consulted me, no one has asked if I mind.”
In a story on GetSurrey.com several other residents voice their objections to the event. They accuse Surrey County Council and the RideLondon organisers of running the event without public consultation and without formal assessment of the impact on individuals and businesses.
Council and organisers were “riding roughshod” over those affected by turning the ride into an annual event, said one objector, Ian Mason, 59, from West Byfleet.
Former county councillor Ian Lake said: “I am incensed by the whole thing. The consultation has been poor, it is a vanity project.”
“People didn’t really mind last year when it was the Olympics and roads were only closed for a short time. This year, the barriers have been up for the last few days and caused a huge amount of inconvenience.”
A spokesman for Surrey County Council told GetSurrey: “We’ve been working with the organisers to ensure everything is done to minimise disruption, with the help of leaflets, drop-in events and the GoSurrey.info website, and to make sure vulnerable people are looked after and emergency services aren’t hampered.”
Event organiser Hugh Brasher of London Marathon Limited was unavailable for comment at the time of writing, but his office have has said he will respond as soon as he’s able.
Here’s the unedited full text of Mr Huggins’s petition:
Apart from the obvious dangers to cyclists,Surrey roads are not suitable.Surrey County Council have, without consultation,decided it would be a great idea to use Surrey as a race track. This in it's self is a thoughtless act but far more importantly residents and numerous businesses are being effected by road closures. This prevents residents of Surrey from leaving their own property and going about their normal business. The road closures were a necessary inconvenience during the Olympic Games but now it looks like Surrey County Council are to make this an annual event. This is all very well but residents of Surrey are pestered and annoyed by cyclists ( practising months in advance of the event ) who ride the route in very large numbers from very early in the morning shouting at each other (have you tried talking whilst riding your bike?) and riding in large groups sometimes three and four abreast or in strings of riders making it virtually impossible for the poor old motorist, many of whom are elderly, to overtake.Traffic violations are common and it is only a matter of time before there is a major accident with the possibility of the loss of life. It will of course be the motorists fault. Have Surrey County Council considered the number of heavy goods vehicles using the roads. The route chosen is all enclosing and no provision has been made for vehicular crossing points. So to facilitate a bike ride many Surrey residents are to be confined to their homes from 5 am until 9 pm.
Surrey versus cyclists
The popularity of the Surrey hills with cyclists has become a source of complaints for locals in the last couple of years. In July Councillor David Preedy told the BBC that local councils were exploring ways in which events could be regulated.
Councillor Preedy, who leads the Lib-Dem group on Mole Valley District Council, said the main problem was the “sheer number” of cyclists.
“Every weekend there are hundreds and hundreds of cyclists and then on top of that, big organised events,” he said. “The pressure on residents is just getting too much, they’re feeling imprisoned, they can’t get out.
“A lot of them, particularly in Box Hill, are older people who feel intimidated driving through large numbers of cyclists.”
In April, Mark Davis, chief executive of Vachery Triathlon organiser Brave Events, said that a meeting he called to discuss road closures for the event was hijacked by protesters.
He alleged he was threatened outside and said others there reported incidents to the police - despite the council agreeing to the road closures. He also said that the event would bring £10 million to the local economy over the next three years.
Mr Davis said: “How many events bring top sports people and that sort of money into the area? You can’t believe how selfish people are because they don’t like cycling. Nobody is going to be trapped. People aren’t going to be stranded on an island.”
Brave Events subsequently changed the event to have partially-closed rather than fully-closed roads.
Fortunately, not everyone in Surrey fails to recognise the money visiting cyclists spend in the local economy. In July, the National Trust painted three logos on the Box Hill climb, reading ‘I love cycling’; ‘I love amazing views’; and ‘I love tea and cakes’.
Add new comment
108 comments
Even after the most extensive consultation imaginable, there will still be some people who are unhappy (whether or not justifiably) about any decision.
Consultation =/= consensus
maybe he is having a dig that if the council planners won't let him shoot then no one gets to use surrey, this was in 2007. So perhaps it's taken him this long to find something to pick on
http://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/local-news/clay-pigeon-shoot-refusal-spa...
It sounds like the event organisers aren't doing their jobs well enough to me.
“A lot of them, particularly in Box Hill, are older people who feel intimidated driving through large numbers of cyclists.”
1. They should be driving around cyclists.
2. If they are complaining about closed road events why are they driving on CLOSED roads ?
I can see both sides of the argument - his clay pigeon business is loosing out when these events are on and I doubt many cyclists stop to pump money into the local economy when there are feed stations on route.(I'll just retire to put my flack jacket on)
Love the usual comment about cyclists riding three and four abreast...
Can't really see the point though - since it would be a pretty inefficient method of drafting.
Up and down the country more or less every day of the week (certainly every weekend) there's an event or occasion that closes roads or causes disruption/annoyance to residents. It's human nature, whatever someone does, somewhere there will be someone else complaining about it.
My Dad lives right on the route of the London Marathon. Every year for one weekend he cannot access his car, can't get across the road to the shops... So he does this strange thing called "planning ahead". Sometimes he stays, stocks up on food, drink etc and watches the event, sometimes he goes away for the weekend.
A mate used to run a shop in Notting Hill which had to be closed for a week every year due to the Notting Hill Carnival. Again, he planned ahead, notified his customers, boarded the shop up and the staff had a holiday.
It's perfectly reasonable, the residents have known about this event for 8 MONTHS. Frankly there is no excuse, there are always alternative arrangements, even in the wild depths of darkest Surrey.
He runs a clay pigeon shooting business and he is complaining about people making noise?
Why are the residents trapped in their homes? Have their arms and legs been cut off?
I always tend to respect people more when they demostrate complete and utter ignorance by using factually incorrect terms like "lycra louts".
I always thought cars where noisier, and there was more of them
Yeah, not like your shooting business makes any noise at all..right?!?!
Unfortunately I've seen groups of cyclist who don't do the cause any favours by not assisting the traffic and, one might say, even going out of their way to be obstructive and even abusive to car drivers.
Let's learn a bit of tolerance on both sides and share the roads like the adults that most of us are.
A one day road closure is unacceptable yet it's OK for most of Surrey roads to be nose-to-tail with 4x4s, lorries and vans 364 days a year.
All hail the motor vehicle, every rider must remember to worship as it passes.
"....and it is only a matter of time before there is a major accident with the possibility of the loss of life. It will of course be the motorists fault."
Quite
If you look at the GetSurrey site:
http://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/local-news/clay-pigeon-shoot-refusal-spa...
you'll find Mr Huggins wanted to use his land for clay shooting "28 Saturdays a year, 52 Wednesdays a year and 28 other days a year"
And he complains about one day's cycling a year? Nimby.
Looney, its cruel to kill virtual birds anyway.
Hmm, Box Hill eh? Wonder how he feels about all the motorbikes riding past his house? Been that way on my old Ducati many times in the past and with its race cans, it was anything but quiet.
I don't have to say "please" or "thank-you". I don't have to hold "doors" open for "other people". I don't have to use my "indicators" when driving. I don't have to use "hand signals" when riding. But I do. It makes life easier for everyone, please re-read what I wrote and try to understand it.
LOL, how patronising it seems, please actually read what i wrote and understand it, go ahead and assist the traffic but when it all goes wrong, the drivers and others will probably try and blame you.
I love it when I look at an article and the comments have already descended into nonsense.
Hi, another attempt, it's stayed on topic and relevant unlike your post xxx
LOL, this reads like bike radar threads, or worse, YouTube comments, when it descends into personal attacks
Calm down people. Someone has an opinion that doesn't chime exactly with yours. By all means educate reasonably and gently - otherwise deal with it.
@Oscarzero: great idea. I live in the Chilterns and there's great riding round here too.
I lived on a closed off street in London for the Olympics and while it was a nuisance for drivers to think differently I did not see much impact on businesses. Starbucks, Tescos, laundry, restaurants etc were full, cars went around the back streets, lots of community and country pride for the events.
I also wasn't consulted on the road closure, woke up one day to see outside the window that people had been busy setting up barriers. Yes, initially I felt I had been 'trapped' in my own home. Then I went out and figured how to cross the road as needed, enjoyed the reduced traffic noise, and liked going out on the balcony to watch the races.
I think the real complaint here is that some people aren't able to adapt and hate change.
I wonder if Mr Huggins has a bee in his bonnet about the Council, after they turned down planning permission to expand his clay pigeon shooting?
You Cannot be Serious! Stupid is as stupid does. This guy is self centered, egotistical; and looking to make a name for himself for all the wrong reasons. MUGGINS is playing a game of come and join my gang.. A trouble maker!
Not for the first time I rather sadly find myself admiring the French and wishing we Brits were a bit more like them. Not only do they have excellent roads but their attitude towards cycling, cyclists and races is to be envied. How sad that a whining OAP in England can't embrace what our neighbours just a few miles over the Channel practically live for. He should be ashamed. Oh, and learn how to use English grammar properly.
If the good people of Surrey cannot see the major benefits of such events being hosted in their area and give just one day in the year I am sorry for them.
I went out to watch with many of the the local residents in my area - Horsley - and all I spoke to were enthusiastic.
Despite being inside the loop as it were it was still possible to get away if you had to.
Well done the organisers and I've got my name in the hat for next year
Can we have a petition to stop stupid petitions from self centred, selfish individuals
"noisy cyclists"? is that a joke, im pretty sure if you give me a decibel meter to take a sound measurement the flow of motorised trafic engines would far outway any noise from cyclists...
even if they were shouting to eachother and their volume was equal too or high than cars and lorries, surely the amount of time they cause noise is far lass than the amount of time that noise is heard from other traffic?!
Pages