- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Matthew Clemo (Gwent Police)Eight-year sentence for drink driver who killed cyclist after emptying vodka bottle
A drink driver who killed a cyclist and only stopped when he crashed into another vehicle has been sentenced to eight years imprisonment at Cardiff Crown Court.
Matthew Clemo, 51, killed Michael Partridge as the 76-year-old grandfather cycled in Bedwas, Caerphilly, on September 25 last year. Despite treatment by paramedics and air ambulance, the cyclist died at the scene having been crushed between Clemo's van and a parked vehicle.
The court heard that Clemo also had low levels of cannabis and painkillers in his system, and had driven from work in Bristol, Wales Online reports. The drink driver later registered 96μg of alcohol per 100ml of breath (legal limit is 35μg), and police found an empty vodka bottle in his van.
Officers also reported Clemo had been so drunk he was unable to stand up without assistance, and said he had no recollection of the collision under interview.
The defendant pleaded guilty to causing death by dangerous driving, prompting Judge Nicola Saffman to sentence him to eight years imprisonment, half of which is to be served in custody, and disqualify him from driving for 12 years.
Clemo crashed his Ford Transit van into a parked car but continued driving and soon after collided with the cyclist. Despite the second collision, the alcohol-fuelled motorist continued driving and hit more parked cars, only stopping once his airbags deployed.
The sentencing hearing heard that Clemo had drifted onto the wrong side of the road on the busy residential street, Pandy Road, and was slightly over the 30mph speed limit when he hit Mr Partridge.
Clemo had 25 previous convictions, with 26 driving offences, including dangerous driving, vehicle taking and driving with excess alcohol. In defence, Jeffrey Jones said Clemo was an alcoholic who had been feeling "low" about work.
The court also heard that since conviction, Clemo has divorced his wife and moved away from her and their 10-year-old son. Mr Jones said the drink driver is "remorseful and upset" and resigned from his job.
However, Judge Saffman said: "Mr Partridge was a 76-year-old retired gentleman who worked hard all his life in the steelworks. He was a beloved husband, father and grandfather and his family have been severely impacted."
A statement from Mr Partridge's family after the incident said: "It is with great sadness that we announce the passing of Michael Vernon Partridge, our beloved husband, father and grandfather, who died on Saturday, September 25. He was taken from us too early in tragic circumstances doing what he loved. Dedicated to his family, he loved his time with his grandchildren, often playing and teasing them into fits of laughter.
"He was also a devoted husband who loved the harbour in Weymouth, watching boats and listening to the ocean waves with wife Pamela. A former Llanwern steelworker, painter and decorator, he was a man who worked hard and loved life. His other passions were music – he was involved with Aber Valley Male Voice Choir for many years and until recently Caerphilly Male Voice Choir – and rugby, where he volunteered and was a committee member with Bedwas Rugby Club."
Dan is the road.cc news editor and joined in 2020 having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for The Non-League Paper. Dan has been at road.cc for four years and mainly writes news and tech articles as well as the occasional feature. He has hopefully kept you entertained on the live blog too.
Never fast enough to take things on the bike too seriously, when he's not working you'll find him exploring the south of England by two wheels at a leisurely weekend pace, or enjoying his favourite Scottish roads when visiting family. Sometimes he'll even load up the bags and ride up the whole way, he's a bit strange like that.
Latest Comments
- wtjs 4 sec ago
it seems that most places just rely on sufficient policing to reduce the issue...
- Matt Page 43 min 44 sec ago
Many manufacturers, including Scribe, can give you methods to reduce the noise level. On Scribe, and other ratchet designs it's usually just adding...
- wtjs 1 hour 21 min ago
It wouldn't work at all where wtjs lives...
- Sriracha 1 hour 38 min ago
Pretty sure AI could skim through hours of footage in a few seconds to identify suspicious events. Of course someone in authority has to care in...
- chrisonabike 1 hour 46 min ago
Bonsai samurai? Or is it just a case of "they seem to get smaller every year"?
- IanGlasgow 2 hours 48 min ago
Sorry to see Endura struggling. They're based in Linvignston, not Edinburgh, which puts them very close to where I grew up....
- mdavidford 4 hours 30 min ago
I dunno - seems like it's coming round on a regular basis...
- Rich_cb 6 hours 11 min ago
The mistake is to focus on the US....
- chrisonabike 6 hours 23 min ago
I mean it seems silly to complain in detail when we're firmly in the territory in the UK of "you will have to live with this the rest of your life ...
- eburtthebike 8 hours 55 min ago
I thought students were supposed to be intelligent?
Add new comment
21 comments
Mr Jones said the drink driver is "remorseful and upset" . . . . . . that he got caught yet again, that this might impinge on his life in the future and that the world now knows what a selfish, murderous p***k he is.
Going by his record I doubt a ban would've stopped him from driving. With people like this, they often don't stop driving until something really serious happens, like a fatality.
My condolences go to the family of his victim.
It's μg in breath, not "mg" - you're a 1000 times out. .
Good spot, thanks - fixed.
To be honest I find it really annoying when the press in general quotes 'x times over the limit' because those figures come from his BAC when he is tested at the police station (or hospital?) which could be hours and hours and hours later.
Like in this case - a long time alcoholic too drunk to stand unassisted and we're saying he's only 2 times over the limit? It's absurd. When he was actually driving he would have been far worse, 5, 6, 7 times or more.
This is really close to me as it happend near my home town of Caerphilly. I remember the roads being closed down because of it. The point I would like to make is just when are people going to realise vehicles can, and do kill other people. No sentence given to the driver will bring back the cyclist killed. The family of Mr Partridge have lost a husband, father and grandfather, and for what. Because someone thought it would be fine to drive a vehicle whilst drunk. But as too often we see, its not fine, when people get behind the wheel of a vehicle, or any mode of transport for that matter they have a duty of care towards other road users and need to take responsibility, and try to use the roads as safely as possible. A very sad society we all live in when people just dont get that.
I send my my sincere condolences and best wishes to Mr Partridges famly, and hope that they can find peace for their loss.
"vehicles can and do kill people", no! Drivers can and do kill people.
Not technically correct. My wife is currently dealing with a car insurance claim after her car was badly damaged after an unoccupied car crashed into her last week. Take away delivery driver had left car running and hand brake failed. Young cyclist behind her would have been flattened and the Police couldn't give a fcuk. Even bigger insult is that he is not accepting liability as he wasn't in the car. You couldn't make it up.
"had driven from work in Bristol"
So that bloke must have driven on the motorway in that state, too...
Given a bottle of vodka was found in his van, we don't know exactly what point on his journey he consumed the vodka. I'm not trying to defend the guy, but it's not evident that he "must" have driven on the motorway in quite that state (albeit likely not in a fit state to drive at any point).
You say that like it is worse than driving on residential road at (slightly over) 30mph in that state.
I had just meant that it's not like he was on his way back from the pub... He'd done quite a trek.
And although OnYerBike has a point, I would have thought that his alcohol measure would be a LOT higher if he had only just necked that bottle of vodka, hence why I wondered if he had it in his cup holder all the way from Bristol (sorry, I watch a lot of Police Traffic Interceptor Cops 24/7...).
Wrong'uns.
Only police interceptors always plays the game of "how many times over the limit are they".
Did you manage to see Monday's traffic cops, that rat arsed woman in the range rover, she had tried to drive away on 3 wheels?
How was this man still allowed behind the wheel? We need to stop treating driving as a right, and start treating it as a privilege.
"Clemo had 25 previous convictions, with 26 driving offences, including dangerous driving, vehicle taking and driving with excess alcohol."
Neatly summing up what is wrong with our ridiculously mis-named justice system. Anyone with a record that bad should never have been allowed to drive again, let alone driving for their job. If they were caught that many times, how many times had they actually broken the law? Judging by what many motorists get away with, it must have been thousands.
I'd suggest that if you've been convicted five times for driving offences, it is clear that you are a serial offender who is unable to control themself so the ability to re-offend should be removed forever.
Completely agree. At what point does the justice system say that punishment is not working you're not allowed behind a wheel ever again? 26 driving offences?! The previous judge should be held negligent in causing this persons death.
Just don't get it....how is that not pre meditated? That should be life...end of
Didn't even get a maximum sentence despite 25 previous convictions including dangerous driving, vehicle taking and driving with excess alcohol.
True - maximum with guilty plea would have been 9 1/3 years as you get 1/3 off. I think the sentence he got was rather stiff as they go because normally you have to declare to witnesses in advance that you intend to kill people with your car and / or kill multiple people, ideally pedestrians on the pavement just to remove ambiguity.
Never mind though, 4 years before he's driving again. What's that you say? He'll put several decades of multiple addictions and not giving a rat's backside behind him and emerge a changed man?
Unfortunately, it isn't premeditated because he (presumably?) didn't actually intend to kill anyone. He just thought, like so many people who have downed a bottle of vodka, that he was fine, just needed to open the windows and get some fresh air etc etc. To any rational person, trying to drive in that state is utterly insane, but that far into your cups, you are not rational...
It doesn't necessarily need to be pre-meditated. We have the principle of oblique intent which is broadly as follows:
The criminal law doctrine of oblique intent was developed at common law to deal with situations in which the agent acted without purpose or desire but where the harmful result of his conduct was foreseen at a very high probability.
Whilst not necessarily specifically aimed at driving offences, it does strike me that, this could be used more in this context. For example, you drove a car at someone "oh I didn't mean to harm them" - "well you were driving a 1.5T hunk of metal at significant speeds and a 75kg chunk of flesh, what did you think was going to happen?".
I don't think we'll ever use oblique intent in any meaningful way for people using a killing machine reckless to scare/intimidate/whatever vulnerable people (its generally reserved for, "I may have put a bomb in a public place and detonated it but I didn't actually mean to kill anyone" type situations) but it would be nice if our justice thought about ways those principles could be applied to driving offences - alas, there is little desire in doing so.